No investigation launched as yet but @lecanardnoir123 had raised an interesting issue in re: the news that the Charity Commission has issued a notice that health-related charities must provide a reliable body of evidence for its recommendations:
For example, I would thought that Mermaids_Gender would need robust evidence to back up their claim of ‘reducing suicidality’ and other such ideologically driven aims.
twitter.com/lecanardnoir/status/1073536471720751104
BMJ on Charity Commission: Provide evidence of claims or leave register, Charity Commission tells complementary and alternative medicine organisations
The Commission's guidance (2) specifically mentions Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as acceptable evidence. It does not state that they accept "reports by patients or observational studies" as evidence. PROMs are validated regulatory standard measures which are used widely in pivotal clinical trials (3). They are most certainly not the same as patient testimonials, or uncontrolled open label observational studies. The Commission appears clear on this point. We hope this will eventually be made obvious to bodies who misuse charity tax breaks and mislead unsuspecting consumers into employing bogus therapies.
www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5248/rr