Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues - legal case?

[MsJeminaPuddleduck]

Lady Justice 👩‍⚖️ (@RadFemLawyer)
09/11/2018, 08:16
Have just seen this. Argument is Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues. pic.twitter.com/WVkBMxZeqv

Do you have a steak bake for your stake out??
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4424712/Drag-Queen-gets-life-sized-Greggs-STEAK-BAKE-tattoo.html

Curses! Discovered! You are too quick for me Bowlofbabelfish

Off to check M and S changing rooms for meat and two veg....

Am I right in saying that RollOnFriday is a website used by those involved in the legal profession in the uk, and so, they would be very clued up about what can and cant be said about anyone who (shall we say) identifies as a lawyer.

The police move to Gold Command and draw up a photo fit of Glinner.

I am crying at the dramatic notion of police protection on all three properties in case of a Glinner attack.

Me too. Made my day

The daft twit had their old YouTube account linked to their blog...which had videos of them, all in their male glory, serving a writ on a woman.

Well, this is all a little bit fascistic, isn't it? Shutting down any dissent, closing all avenues of debate in civic society, using violence to prevent women meeting...pretty sinister stuff really.

So the man whacked round the head later died (not connected to Hayden) and Hayden jokes about it all?

Was Hayden preachy at all towards Lisa muggeridge’s train fine from years ago? I know Harrop thought it was noteworthy so I wonder what he’ll make of actual literal violence? Perhaps he’ll dismiss it as insignificant as SH has

Stephanie Hayden
@flyinglawyer73
Replying to
@bindelj
Not trying Julie. Is suing. Now go and enjoy the rest of your evening and stop desperately digging up bullshit from the last century

It certainly is interesting to see what Steph finds amusing, isn't it?

If RollOn think they can get away with that wording then they're probably correct, so be braver, other publications.

Here's another person who doesn't like Mumsnet:

twitter.com/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Atheonlysprout%20mumsnet&src=typd

He likes to dox feminists on Twitter.

However he is not so careful with his own identity (despite denials twitter.com/TheOnlySprout/status/1056122640820252672).

twitter.com/TheOnlySprout/status/1053235798286524416

goo.gl/maps/5h3KSuyMGUq

Oh dear what a shame for this to happen to a member of the Fallon Fox Fanclub (yes really, per his FB likes)

trailing ) on that link there twitter.com/TheOnlySprout/status/1056122640820252672

Ah yes, Mr Billingham...another nasty man

Twitter has a new Hateful Conduct Policy.

help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy

"We prohibit targeting individuals with repeated slurs, tropes or other content that intends to dehumanize, degrade or reinforce negative or harmful stereotypes about a protected category. This includes targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals. "

So apparently 'deadnaming' crooks is not allowed.

Also banned is cartoons

"altering images of individuals to include animalistic features"

What's happening with Sprout Quiet? Twitter pages seem to be being deleted.

Which twitter pages? All links above working for me (he might be blocking you, try a private browser window if so)

He has posted another rather desperate denial that he is Mr. Billingham

twitter.com/TheOnlySprout/status/1066093269589864448

Not sure if he's noticed the Woodpark connection or he's just trying to ignore it.

I am amused, anyway, after all the women he doxed.

Here's his other account: twitter.com/oolon/status/1066106502732292096

Apparently he tried to delete a bunch of tweets but didn't reckon on the meddling terfs.

Well if that's the person who has been running the Sprout accounts, this comment is truly breathtaking:

"So much for their supposed care about safeguarding and kids. That is quite disturbing in the lengths of stalking they went to."

It is very disturbing the lengths of stalking that the person behind the Sprout accounts went to over a significant period.

So who posted pictures of the children? The person themselves on their account?

Now I’m very very anti doxxing and extremely anti posting pics of people’s families, but what this person said was that people had posted pictures of their kids and what actually happened was that THEY had posted pictures of their kids? On a public twitter account?

Is that right?

I don't think the amount of targetted harrassment, smearing and damage done by the Sprout accounts can be understated.

Isn't it the case that one of the current 'mass terf blocks' as well as the site that reveals the various block lists (and so passes on further data about those using it) is run by the person behind the Sprout accounts?

If Sprout does in fact have a daughter I really hope that she has a strong enough will to resist being overly influenced by her unpleasant father. Imagine growing up with that as the primary male influence in your life.

Sprout is the original block bot programmer.

If he is the person being talked about, of course.