I see men are lining up in the comments to give a version of 'if you'd stayed in your place like we told you, this wouldn't happen'. Thereby demonstrating exactly why women need sex based protection, including from all men who identify as women, as every man is Shroedinger's Rapist. The fact men don't like hearing it has no bearing on its truth.
And also missed in this: women should not have to prove beyond all doubt and argument that they have genuine concerns about their safety to maintain their right to women only spaces. Most women are not comfortable with situations of privacy and dignity with men, even their fathers and brothers. Most women want the right to meet apart from men for groups, societies, activities, not just for safety or religious and cultural reasons but because sometimes they just want to be with other women, and a group is different when men and socialisation is not involved. 'No we don't want to' should be enough. Men are sufficiently respected (and their aggressive response feared) that no real attempts have been made on their language or spaces. That tells you a whole lot about equality.
Instead, women are pleading with men to hear them and care about actual bodily safety with self ID, because they know no one will hear or care about anything else less serious. And even their right to bodily safety is seen as something discussion worthy, with 'compromise' expected.
Two years ago I'd have agreed women had pretty much gained equality. My eyes have been massively opened by the GRA stuff. Women are barely even off the starting post. In the GRA game, as many have said, women are not seen as players, women are the bloody ball.