Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The reality of self id .

34 replies

SirVixofVixHall · 02/11/2018 21:29

I have just read this thread on twitter and this post horrified me. MP s and others telling us that there is no risk to women, this is what all our single sex spaces will turn into.
I am so angry on behalf of this woman and her daughter.

The reality of self id .
OP posts:
Gileswithachainsaw · 02/11/2018 22:31

But that would never happen.

Ereshkigal · 02/11/2018 23:01

No. No one would ever pretend to be trans and anyway, they know their gender better than YOU.

sackrifice · 02/11/2018 23:11

Well, yes. This is the reality of self id.

arranfan · 02/11/2018 23:15

I'm really sad that you've shared that hallucination with me because it must be proof that some of this spreads like social contagion through technology.

Because. This. Never. Happens.

And PP is correct. They know their gender better than I do and they'd never ever just be an obnoxious person knowingly causing distress or discomfort to others because they can.

Because. This. Never. Happens.

SirVixofVixHall · 03/11/2018 10:34

I’ve had a friend insist that this would never happen , because no one would go the the EXTREME LENGTHS of becoming trans in order to abuse women. When all a man has to do is say the magic word “trans” .

OP posts:
JellySlice · 03/11/2018 11:33

What I would like to respond in that situation would be "That's fine. But you have a male body, and male bodies do not belong in toilets for female bodies."

Would I speak up?

Probably not, because I'd fear a violent reaction.

SadAngry

scotsheather · 03/11/2018 12:44

I once complained to staff at a holiday park about this as younger DD got a bit scared, albeit the man seemed to have long hair and some pink clothing. They said they couldn't do anything unless he actually did something inappropriate, being male doesn't itself allow them to kick someone out.

arranfan · 03/11/2018 12:57

Probably not, because I'd fear a violent reaction.

I wonder if, in some places and circumstances, we'd also be apprehensive that not only would there not be support from any other women there but they might also turn on us, albeit verbally?

Gncq · 03/11/2018 12:58

How do you know they were "pretending to be trans?"
It could well be that they were trans. And just wanted to pee.
Did the transwoman actually do anything other than use the loo?

Knicknackpaddyflak · 03/11/2018 13:25

Absolutely Gncq

Every woman and girl's vision of using a safe, comfortable, private bathroom involves accepting that an obvious male in there is probably, hopefully not going to do anything to actually harm or disturb you. Even though the fact he's there, no matter how beautifully he behaves, makes you already uncomfortable and wary as fuck about using the loo yourself (and has forced you to walk out and not pee if your faith, culture or trauma history is inconvenient). That's absolutely what women should be aspiring to. For fucks sake.

Third space, unisex, floor to ceiling provision alongside female only.

KatVonGulag · 03/11/2018 13:28

Well they certainly don't have gender disphoria if they aren't making any attempt to look like the opposite sex?
Surely this transwomen who looks exactly like a man would feel more comfortable using the men's? Stubble and dirty tracksuit and penis and all?
The Trans umbrella is causing harm. This stuff is bollocks.

KatVonGulag · 03/11/2018 13:29

Agreed. We need third spaces. Unisex and well designed, alongside single sex provision.

SpartacusAutisticusAHF · 03/11/2018 13:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JellySlice · 03/11/2018 13:50

Who is this 'third space' for?

Post-op transexuals, who mostly want to live their lives as discreetly as possible, who have never been barred from/challenged in/evicted from the Ladies' loos? Whom most of us recognise and accept anyway?

Or the rest of the bloody 'umbrella', who are not interested in any third space, because they want the validation, and power, of claiming female spaces?

JellySlice · 03/11/2018 13:52

Quite, SpartacusAutisticus. If there's room for a 'third space' put in an accessible space.

KatVonGulag · 03/11/2018 13:55

Well my DD best friend is trans, and refuses to use either men's or women's loos.
She (she is biologically female) is terrified.

She uses the disabled loos but I know that pisses off disabled people.

So it would help her.

SpartacusAutisticusAHF · 03/11/2018 14:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Knicknackpaddyflak · 03/11/2018 14:13

Third spaces provide everyone with a choice if they prefer not to use the space for their own biological sex, and meet the need for privacy, dignity and feelings of safety for everyone. The lay out of those third spaces yes, great opportunity for making more inclusive provision generally.

Yes, that will not suit the extreme TRA lobby, for a number of reasons. However other people have needs and rights too, and it's about balancing those needs.

ginghamstarfish · 03/11/2018 14:19

Third spaces are a good idea in theory ... but in practice the man in the OP's post, and others like him, would still insist on using the women's. At least us women could then use the third space I suppose.

SirVixofVixHall · 03/11/2018 14:25

Gncq 🙄

OP posts:
RiverTam · 03/11/2018 14:26

Proper counselling etc would help your DD’s friend, Kat. Affirming her identity as trans won’t.

citiesofbismuth · 03/11/2018 14:31

Women are safer going into the accessible toilets because they're a separate room. I've bought a radar key in case I have to use one that's locked.

Toilet categories now appear to be:

Male
Accessible/Disabled
Male who chooses to be in there for whatever reason whatsoever

SpartacusAutisticusAHF · 03/11/2018 15:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

citiesofbismuth · 03/11/2018 15:16

It's a proper radar key.

NaturalBornWoman · 03/11/2018 17:02

It could well be that they were trans. And just wanted to pee.
Did the transwoman actually do anything other than use the loo?

Given the person was obviously male and presented as male, in what way did their 'transness' prevent them from using the male facilities? In what way would this obviously male person have been less safe in the men's than any other male? Why would they feel more comfortable in the women's, given they would stand out as different and also probably be able to perceive the discomfort of the women present and potentially risk being challenged?