Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

We've been lied to about 'Single SEX' wards since 2010.

93 replies

Barracker · 16/10/2018 22:06

medium.com/@anneharperwright/sex-gender-the-nhs-1e8f4e6363a6

They were ALWAYS based upon 'gender'.
The evidence is in NHS documents from 2010.
And the Department of Health were told, by the NHS team, not to tell people wards were segregated by sex, because they knew the policy was based on gender.

But the DOH purposefully used the word sex to the public instead.

We've been deliberately misled.

OP posts:
HandsOffMyRights · 16/10/2018 22:57

Here

We've been lied to about 'Single SEX' wards since 2010.
LangCleg · 16/10/2018 22:57

I cannot believe what I am reading.

littlbrowndog · 16/10/2018 22:58

Ffs ffs
This is sinister

What is going on and who is driving this and how have they got so much power

AngryAttackKittens · 16/10/2018 23:01

Is anyone in contact with Janice Turner or Andrew Gilligan? If so get this to them ASAP before anyone has time to hide the evidence.

AngryAttackKittens · 16/10/2018 23:02

To be absolutely crystal clear - there is no possible way that the NHS didn't know that this would increase the rate at which female patients were sexually assaulted, and they did it anyway. Why, and who made that decision? The public deserve answers.

MagicMix · 16/10/2018 23:24

I have no words. This is too horrifying for words.

Barracker · 16/10/2018 23:32

Documents are backed up, but always good to have further redundancy, so doesn't hurt to download or archive anything form the links in the medium article, if anyone fancies it.

Has anyone noticed that this "self-identified gender" segregation in the NHS preceded the Equality Act?

There's a 2009 paper about 'same sex wards' that states the patient's preference is paramount. Legal sex to be disregarded.

Sex Self-ID has been sneaking in the back door for a long time.

There's to be a follow up article with more information about our medical records.

OP posts:
R0wantrees · 16/10/2018 23:47

To be absolutely crystal clear - there is no possible way that the NHS didn't know that this would increase the rate at which female patients were sexually assaulted, and they did it anyway. Why, and who made that decision? The public deserve answers

2017 'Mixed-sex wards endanger and humiliate women'
Catherine Bennett
(extract)
Accusations of shiftiness are more quickly forgotten, after all, than are reversals on this scale. The unacceptability of mixed-sex wards has been a cherished theme for every opposition since Tony Blair alighted, in 1996, on what is still, universally, agreed to be a valid cause of public upset.

Mixed wards, he said “cause indignity, upset people”. Subsequent studies, including a 2008 examination of nurse and patient perspectives, confirmed he had not exaggerated. There were patients, it confirmed, of both sexes and of varied ages, who “experienced a lack of privacy, worried about bodily exposure and felt uncomfortable”. Nurses entirely sympathised. “Mixed-sex accommodation,” it concluded, “is an unacceptable solution to bed shortages.”

Advertisement

Moreover, investigations showed, objections go far beyond the allegedly trivial ones, according to more disinhibited patients, of commodes, Carry On! gowns, proximity to men who might resemble, to pick one or two names at random, the Pimlico Plumber and twat-detector Charlie Mullins or the BBC star and famed beauty connoisseur, John Inverdale.

Patients and their relatives attested to intrusion, exhibitionism and leering from nearby beds, even with staff around. In 2009, Channel 4 discovered that almost two-thirds of sexual assaults by patients in hospitals (21 out of 33 in 2007/8), occurred in mixed-sex wards. Variations on Blair’s question to an evasive John Major – “Is it beyond the collective wit of the government and the health administrators to deal with that problem?” – was a reliable line in opposition outrage until Jeremy Hunt declared in 2014 that this indignity was “nearly”, or “virtually”, history.

Get Society Weekly: our newsletter for public service professionals
Read more
Regulations introduced by the coalition government in 2010 compelled hospital trusts to report their figures for mixed-ward occupation, then fined them £250 per night for breaches. “We want to see the end of mixed-sex wards,” Nick Clegg said. “Everybody knows this has got to end.” As recently as his 2015 conference speech, a key part of Hunt’s claims to representing “the party of the NHS” was the unqualified triumph: “mixed sex wards eliminated”. The mysterious disappearance of mixed-sex elimination from the recent Tory manifesto, plus its own virtual elimination from the J Hunt repertoire, has in turn revived opposition testimonials to the distress underlying the statistics." (continues)

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/30/mixed-sexed-wards-endanger-and-humiliate-women

ahagwearsapointybonnet · 17/10/2018 00:02

Bloody hell ShockAngry

R0wantrees · 17/10/2018 00:07

How long has Tara Hewitt been so involved with NHS?
James Kirkup Spectator:
"What explains the disproportionate number of girls (child ‘assigned female at birth’, to use the approved term) who are starting a journey that can lead to hormone treatment, then binding and ultimately removing their breasts? Is it possible that this is simply part of a wider crisis of mental health among girls?

I don’t know, and neither do the doctors and scientists who study this issue. If you talk to the clinicians at the Tavistock Clinic in London, the NHS centre for the treatment of gender-variant children, they’ll tell you that all the factors I mentioned may be at work, but the evidence base is still incomplete, that they need more time and data before offering explanations. (They’ll also tell you that quite a lot of the children referred to them as transgender will in time desist – although this is not a term the clinic would use – and decide to live in their original gender.)

The government now intends to commission research into all this. You might think that sounds sensible and mundane. You would be wrong.

According to Tara Hewitt, founder of the Trans Equality Legal Initiative (TELI), prominent campaigner for transgender rights and an adviser to numerous public bodies including the NHS, the proposed research is ‘absurd and offensive’. The project should be ‘dropped in the bin — it’s simply not an inquiry that needs to happen,’ Hewitt reckons.

This is the quintessential trans-rights response to scrutiny: even looking for facts about children’s welfare is transphobic. Just accept that trans girls are girls and trans women are women. End of debate." (continues)
www.spectator.co.uk/2018/10/trans-rights-have-gone-wrong/

thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/a3385533-Prominant-campaigning-role-of-Tara-Hewitt-NHS-TELI-Social-work-universities-etc

flourella · 17/10/2018 00:29

I've looked into the relevant policies of several NHS Trusts, so know that in some places at least, people get to be accommodated on the ward that takes their fancy if they only say the magic words. But it is shocking to know that the NHS and politicians have been so duplicitous in implementing a nationwide policy.

Oh, we're going to assure the public that we're doing this important thing, for the benefit of all patients, but actually we're doing something different for a teeny tiny minority and fuck any issues around safeguarding and dignity.

Barracker · 17/10/2018 00:57

I'm not sure that minority is really so teeny tiny any more...

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/04/nearly-two-million-britons-expected-question-gender-health-boss/

And the NHS policy is for self-ID people.

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200215/CNO_note_dh_098893.pdf

Trans people should be accommodated according to their presentation: the way they dress,and the name and pronouns that they currently use.
• This may not always accord with the physical sex appearance of the chest or genitalia;
• It does not depend upon their having a gender recognition certificate (GRC) or legal name change;
who live continuously or temporarily in the gender role that is opposite to their natal sex

OP posts:
Materialist · 17/10/2018 01:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ProfessionalBarren · 17/10/2018 01:08

Trans people should be accommodated according to their presentation: the way they dress,and the name and pronouns that they currently use. And this is all we are to the woke pricks who make these policies: being a woman is just about a name and an outfit. Fuck that.

Datun · 17/10/2018 01:14

WHY?????

FadingMint · 17/10/2018 01:16

"Woman" is a performance.

Fuck that shit. Spit.

Datun · 17/10/2018 01:25

Are men frightened of transwomen?

flourella · 17/10/2018 01:39

I'd never seen that estimate of 2 million before. Hopefully a majority of them will be meaninglessly non-binary and willing to be housed on wards appropriate to their sex.

This is where it’s always been headed, the elimination of biological sex binary in favor of a femininity/masculinity binary

Has anyone figured out why anyone would want this and how they've managed to convince so many policymakers, institutions and businesses that it's the way to go? I've been pondering it for a couple of years now and still no clue. It's madness.

R0wantrees · 17/10/2018 01:40

Tara Hewitt training health care professionals.

Listen carefully:

flourella · 17/10/2018 01:55

I mean, I get why removing the meaning of woman as a sex class, and therefore the idea of protections, provisions and rights exclusively for people within that class, might appeal to fucking misogynists. But this whole thing can't have sprung up from a conspiracy, can it? And why are so many women okay with it?!!

This NHS hospital thing is no good for men either, albeit without putting them at risk in the way it does women.

FadingMint · 17/10/2018 02:41

There are men, of all sorts, who feel that female autonomy has gone too far,.
Sadly, there are also women who agree with this.

PersonWithAVulva · 17/10/2018 03:46

Fucking hell, all this rubbish was planned ages ago..

deepwatersolo · 17/10/2018 06:25

This is bewildering. Governments lie to their people allright. Nothing new there.
But in this particular instance, what did they think? That nobody would ever notice?

deepwatersolo · 17/10/2018 06:31

Of course, if you are invested in sabotaging and, ideally, mortally wounding the NHS... as Andrew Lansley apparently was...

Swipe left for the next trending thread