Spoke online with friend about GRA. She is pro GRA. Was able to provide actual evidence to respond to her points. She said I had raised good points but that she was unable to discuss with me due to 'my views on trans people'. That is, I hold to the actual definition of woman as adult human female. ( I also believe in fully supporting trans rights but not where they cause harm, or unfairness, to women and girls, as one group should never be put at risk/disadvantage to protect another).
I pointed out that the definition matters as if you believe anyone who declares they are a woman is a woman you house male rapists in women's prisons.
I pointed out that it was not unreasonable to expect her to justify her redefining of the word 'woman' but she got offended at this suggestion (apparently her right not to say NO to justifying herself is important, but women's right to say NO to sharing intimate or safe spaces or prisons with males with penis's and sex offenders isn't).
I can't help but conclude that such people refuse to defend their newly created definition of woman because, deep down, they know they can't. I'm struggling to think of anywhere else where people just refuse point blank to defend their foundational beliefs. . It's a very manipulative and dishonest tactic to take.
Sorry, just had to get that off my chest.