Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Father Ted writer says TRA is a dangerous troll

61 replies

TurfClub · 29/09/2018 06:23

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/father-ted-writer-graham-linehan-says-the-trans-activist-stephanie-hayden-is-dangerous-troll-6pwrg9p68

Said TRA tried to doxx Graham's wife after he retweeted about said TRA being a dodgy misogynist.

OP posts:
DrinkFeckArseGirls · 29/09/2018 10:22

I wonder what Kathrine Ryan did to be regarded as transphobe. There was an article about her on BBC news, I clicked on the photo - it took me to instagram and voila the posts below! Confused

Father Ted writer says TRA is a dangerous troll
AngryAttackKittens · 29/09/2018 10:23

RE Wasting police time, depends on whether the force they try to involve is West Yorkshire I suppose...

Juells · 29/09/2018 10:30

I wonder what Kathrine Ryan did to be regarded as transphobe.

Everyone's a transphobe unless they're a complete supporter of the TWAW mantra. Katherine Ryan is a comedian who gives no fucks so she'll be a figure of hate to woman-haters.

TurfClub · 29/09/2018 14:42

"On a completely separated and unrelated matter: Does anyone know how to report fraud to companies house? Asking for a friend."

companieshouse.blog.gov.uk/2016/02/17/fraud-what-we-can-and-cant-do/

Not quite clear, but it looks like you might need to report to the police. But I think Companies House does also prosecute.

Try their email address there.

OP posts:
Datun · 29/09/2018 15:13

"And what on earth is a Female Gender Recognition Certificate? I've never had any trouble recognising women....."

...someone else said it's a piece of paper that you wave at reality.

Juells · 29/09/2018 15:15

it's a piece of paper that you wave at reality.

😂

TerfAndSerf · 08/10/2018 00:10

Is there anywhere to find out about the many faces of Stephanie?

The Terf Club posts have been deleted and I don't have the skills to look for caches.

RealGhouls · 08/10/2018 07:14

What do you want to know TerfAndSerf? Stephanie uses multiple names to incorporate companies, which are compulsorily wound up with out paying taxes. Stephanie also has various Twitter aliases. Stephanie has a (cousin?) Jamie, who is even bigger on the company formation side. Stephanie harasses women on Twitter. Till recently there were some Youtube videos of Stephanie, as a man several years ago, including one where Stephanie harasses a couple at their home. Stephanie also created some stalker Twitter accounts which call the wife of that couple misogynistic slurs, accuse her of 'drinking her husband's wages', being a 'bitch', and so on. These are mostly still up on Twitter.

Stephanie has a private Instagram account in the name of Stephanie to 2016 as well as a public one in the name of Tony up to 2016. Stephanie runs the Judicial Cat blogspot. Stephanie used to live in Tower Hamlets and was quite exercised about Muslims. As in this Daily Star piece www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/393338/Jihadi-Isis-flag-Tower-Hamlets-London Stephanie remains quite upset about Muslims.

You can find Stephanie & Jamie's companies quite easily on Companies House. But there are some which are too old to appear, so I'm not sure what happened with those.

Stephanie uses the initials SRH, and previously used the initials TGSH. They have weird usernames like TGSH2009, and SRH2018 with a year after the date the username was created.

Example: old.reddit.com/user/srh2018

BettyDuMonde · 08/10/2018 08:08

SH loves an exclamation mark.

FermatsTheorem · 08/10/2018 08:26

Having seen the screenshots of the records at companies' house, and the video RealGhouls mentions, I can say her post looks bang-on-the-money as an analysis of the situation. I will also be very interested to see whether it remains standing, because I think certain parties are using the threat of litigation to cover up their dubious past. Note - threat only. Defending litigation is expensive so unless a business' "mission statement" is uncovering wrongdoing (e.g. Private Eye, who regard the occasional lost libel case as part of the expenses of running their business), most will cave at the threat of litigation even if the case would be winnable if it went to court.

(I think this will be going through Glinner's mind: can I defend this without bankrupting myself and more importantly my family in the process?)

EspressoButler · 08/10/2018 08:56

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread