Man pretends to have Downs and hires young women to change his nappy

[IamalsoSpartacus]

Also requires them to wash his genitals. He is often sexually aroused when they are changing him.

He is now on trial for sexual abuse.

But men would never pretend to be transgender in order to abuse women, would they.

www.wfla.com/national/man-pretends-to-have-down-syndrome-hires-caregivers-to-bathe-him-change-his-diapers/1440711337

It was used as a defence for Jess Bradley. Apparently flashing your ladycock is nothing to be ashamed of - article here:-
medium.com/@notCursedE/jess-bradley-suspended-from-nus-c0b0f5d469d8

Is kink-shaming part of the sex-positive movement? How dare anyone criticise how men get their rocks off.

Its about the intentional removal of all boundaries and values around them, by nice little gentle teasing and shaming and buzz phrases like 'kink shaming' that make nice liberal people feel bad and uncool if they don't obey. It requires people to say No. And be willing to say 'you feeling bad/crying/ telling me I'm not cool is not going to get you your own way'. And 'Actually I can think for myself and my self image isn't based on what you think of me, so you calling me names and trying to shame me won't work'. And 'I have an internal sense of right and wrong that does not require external validation, and I'm not afraid to stick to them even if you get angry'.

We need to empower a whole lot of women to stand up together and say those things.

And yes, it's a men's sexual rights movement.

Could I be the first on this thread to say that this literally never happens?

And if it does, then women do it more.

Or worse. Or something.

I am sorry. I cannot not make fun of a grown, physically healthy man, who gets off on shitting his nappies while babbling. I cannot. You can as well tell me not to breathe.

Pretty much all of this comes down to boundaries. The rage at encountering a boundary, any boundary, and the lengths to which TRAs will go to break them. Boundaries of language, boundaries from groups, boundaries of access, boundaries of bodily and sexual autonomy, personal boundaries, boundaries around publically acceptable behaviour.... boundary = rage.

Is kink-shaming part of the sex-positive movement? How dare anyone criticise how men get their rocks off.

It's outrageous innit. Here's a longish piece on why disapproving of Trump (allegedly) paying prostitutes to wee is definitely kink shaming but might be ok cos he's a fascist?

www.bustle.com/p/how-goldenshowergate-sparked-the-kink-shaming-conversation-we-needed-to-have-29659

This has really sickened me. And I read all the Bradley and Challenor threads so that’s saying something. Those poor women. They must have known something was up from the start. I mean, pretending to have Downs FFS. They must have thought to themselves from day one “this guy doesn’t look like he has Downs” but they would have dismissed it because they were told that he did! How badly would it have reflected on them, as carers, to point out the obvious?

You can as well tell me not to breathe

I know, deep, I know. The unbelievable breadth of male perversion, and how they always want to rope in unwilling and unaware women.

Ah yes Rosemary, where is AllDayBreakfast to tell us that women are as disgusting as men? Nowhere to be seen, you say? Too busy soaking up revolting porn, no doubt.

Talking about rage: for me the epitome of a raging man has always been Jack Torrance in the Kubrick Movie 'The Shining'. A movie that has always made me uneasy. Lo and behold, a couple of months back, I saw a convincing analysis of the movie, outlining how Kubrick alludes to the sexual abuse of Jack's son by Daddy. On rewatching it, I even caught what you can call a 'furry' theme.

It is like Kubrick made all those allusions to what cannot be named and over all those years I was too naive to get it. And now it is all coming together. Haha.

Movie analysis:

Here's a longish piece on why disapproving of Trump (allegedly) paying prostitutes to wee is definitely kink shaming but might be ok cos he's a fascist.

I see it as satire/mocking being the only sharp weapon of the powerless. And narcissists hate being laughed at. (As for Trump, not sure it makes sense to target him for something unconfirmed, given there are enough well documented incidents worth shaming him for. If he indeed can be shamed.)

That's very disturbing googling Anlaf

Abusive men will do anything to access vulnerable women.
Claiming trans status will be the easiest thing in the world.

I haven’t rtft but how can anyone pretend to be downs. You either have downs syndrome or you don’t.

It's outrageous innit. Here's a longish piece on why disapproving of Trump (allegedly) paying prostitutes to wee is definitely kink shaming but might be ok cos he's a fascist?

LOL what a vacuous article.

The whole kinkshaming thing is so juvenile. Sorry, not everyone is going to find your penchant for (insert unusual sexual interest here) as appealing as you do, and that's something you're just going to have to learn to cope with.

And that's just when we're talking about the kinks that don't lead to actual bodily harm.

I haven’t rtft but how can anyone pretend to be downs. You either have downs syndrome or you don’t.

Isn't that the point? If the material reality of biology is in dispute, you can identify as anything you wish.

When human sexual dimorphism is characterised as a "spectrum" and the hard of thinking swallow this nonsense and go ahead and develop public policy on the basis of fantasy, people can identify as Downs-afffected. Or women. Or goldfish. Even as Northerners.

It makes a terrible mockery of the people with Downs who live good lives with their challenges, but ethics seems not to be a strong point of fetishists.

Since when have Downs Syndrome people needed nappies? Surely a carer would see that their client did not have Downs.

Nappy wearers don't necessarily wet or soil the nappies, what they like is the changing routine, cream or Vaseline rubbed on, pampered and powdered. They also like dummies and breast feeding. In short, they want to be babies again. Weird.