Clarification on who and what we can discuss

[IfIWasABirdIdFlyIn2ACeilingFan]

Clearly Lily is on the no list.

I would like clarification from MNHQ as to why we can’t discuss Lily, who else we can’t discuss and what we can’t discuss.

Two threads regarding Lily’s public posts on twitter have been deleted this evening. According to MNHQ these were deleted for being a personal attack and a pile on. However, HQ will be aware of a thread discussing boris Johnston, a thread discussing Colleen Nolan, and one discussing Roxanne Pallett. All of which have been far from complimentary. All allowed to stand.

There would appear to be different standards being applied according to who is being discussed.

I’ve reported this thread in the hope that HA will address this issue and provide clarification. I also ask that this thread does not become a thread about Lily as it will be deleted. This thread is for clarification about what we can discuss and not a TAAT.

MNHQ: Can’t the ‘pile-on’ posts be deleted then and the rest of the thread legitimately discussing be left to stand?

I was posting about what I see is the failure of duty of care from Labour to an apparently aspiring candidate for future political office who Labour are seemingly happy to see tweeting on about posting repeated photos online of their sexualised body areas until (in Lily’s words) this was ‘marked as inappropriate’.

There seems to be a serious mismatch between how Lily’s sees Lily’s relationship with the Labour Party.. and how the Labour Party sees Lily’s relationship with Labour.

Given that we all know that no woman or serious aspiring future political candidate would be supported or tolerated to do things like that.