Sarah
I cannot believe your posts still irritate me enough to take some time to respond to them, despite previous posters having tackled your points. I think it is mainly the tone I perceive in your writing and the bad-faith argument. But I am grateful to you in a way for continually challenging these threads. If only to help me clarify my thoughts.
I have only seen this mentioned as an issue for one trans child - Jazz Jennings. Giving testosterone to trans boys results in a massive increase in sex drive and growth of a micro penis.
Like previous posters have written, re-naming organs does not make them actual other organs. A heart is a heart, it does not become a liver just because you call it a liver. And should it not be considered shameful that we aren't more worried about whether the trans children's sexual function in adulthood will be permanently affected? Why aren't we thinking and talking about this more?
Triptorelin, not Lupron is used in the UK. Janice could have described Lupron as a licensed drug used for the treatment of precious puberty, but she wants to make it sound scary so uses "cancer drug". Also, she does not explain what "off label" means. Triptorelin has been tested and found to be safe for use with children. Why it is off label is because the drug companies have not spent the money conducting research to prove it is beneficial for trans children. However, there is plenty of other research that indicates puberty blockers are beneficial.
Triptolin also has a long list of potential side effects... ( www.drugs.com/sfx/triptorelin-side-effects.html ) Pretty much most of the drugs given for transition are given "off label" because they haven't been licensed specifically for these uses. Here is the GMC description, in case you haven't seen it:
Most of the medications used for the treatment of gender dysphoria are not licensed for this specific indication, although GPs will be familiar with their use in primary care for other purposes. Our guidance allows for prescribing outside the terms of the licence ('off-licence') where this is necessary to meet the specific needs of the patient, and where this is no suitably licensed medicine that will meet the patient's needs.
( www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-hub/trans-healthcare#prescribing )
We don't know what the long-term effects of the treatment of these drugs will be, because this is all so new! What we do know is that we are potentially raising a generation of people who have never gone through their natural puberty, and never even achieved fertility. They will have made that choice when they are pre-pubescent. The idea that we are merely "buying time" is highly questionable, because every action will potentially have knock-on effects. If you're a child whose parents are giving you medication to be live as a different gender than your sex, then it's not inconceivable that you are now going to be more locked into the medical transition path. This is why the Tavi advises a gentle wait-and-see approach even for social transitioning in young children, so that if a child changes their mind later they do not have as great a barrier to come back to the gender identity of their birth sex.
I don't think anyone is arguing that trans women's brains are hard wired to like pink or such. It does not particularly matter what weight it is environment and what weight it is biology (although some twin studies have shed some light on this). What is more important is that for the vast majority of individuals with gender dysphoria their gender identity is immutable and causes life long misery unless they receive the appropriate treatment.
Nope, you have it wrong again. Have you sen the discussions around "brain science" on this subject? Trans ideology really needs us to buy into the idea that women are hard-wired to be feminine. Trans activists are using precisely gender stereotypes to explain being "trans," which I think propagates an idea that children who do not feel comfortable with these stereotypes are trans. What you're also glossing over is that biological sex is immutable, and transitioning can cause life-long misery for the person if it is actually the wrong choice for them (due to infertility and permanent bodily alterations). We know that at least half of all children who develop a trans identity desist.
Pure scapegoating. The campaign for rights for trans children to receive the appropriate medical treatment is being lead by Mermaids, run by Susie Green, a non-trans women. Stonewall is led by Ruth Hunt a non-trans woman. And Gires by Terry Reed a non-trans women and her husband Bernie a non-trans man. Any social contagion is due to interaction with their peers and viewing posts by trans guys (e.g. vlogs) on the internet
You MUST know you are cherry picking. The most prominent trans activists in the media are trans women... It's not even close. Mermaids has some very questionable history, which has been discussed on this board before. And why haven't you mentioned Action for Trans Health, led by Jess Bradley, a trans woman, who have trained the NHS and seem to want to de-medicalize the transition process as much as possible?
I think it's very troubling that you're not worried about social contagion. Why aren't you concerned that children/young females may be making these permanent medical decisions for the wrong reasons?