Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Single sex areas - petition

58 replies

Mxyzptlk · 02/08/2018 00:28

Sex-segregated areas - a petition to keep them sex-segregated -

www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-keep-sex-segregated-areas-sex-segregated

OP posts:
OP posts:
Mxyzptlk · 02/08/2018 21:57

bump

OP posts:
SarahAr · 02/08/2018 22:52

Thing is due to the EA spaces are gender segregated not sex segregated. So you can hardly ask Theresa May to retain sex segregated spaces when we don't have them.

And besides I think Theresa May has other things to worry about. Like Brexit. And keeping her job.

UpstartCrow · 02/08/2018 22:56

These areas were never segregated by gender. It has always been about biological differences between the sexes.
(As the petition says)

Angryresister · 03/08/2018 00:25

Sex not gender

Wanderabout · 03/08/2018 01:05

If Theresa May wants to keep her job then telling the largely-unaware-of-the-more-extreme-trans-lobby-demands public that she doesn't think it is proportional or legitimate to keep fully intact males out of their daughter's changing rooms is probably not going to help, is it?

Wanderabout · 03/08/2018 01:09

"Well everyone sorry Brexit is happening probes no deal so we're all going to starve, sozzers. Good news though, the penis will be given the full freedom of the kingdom and henceforth can be barred from no place.

LightofaSilveryMoon · 03/08/2018 01:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SarahAr · 03/08/2018 08:38

I suspect this comment

Sarah, you are lying again.

Sex is a protected characteristic, and real, factual. Gender identity is not.

will be removed for breach of guidelines. However, I would like the opportunity to defend myself.

By the comment you mean that I am deliberately intending to mislead and have done so before. Every comment I have posted to MN has been made in good faith and is true to the best of my knowledge. I suspect this is pretty rare for an pseudonymous on-line discussion board.

The EHRC statutory guidance states that when it comes to single sex spaces, trans people should be treated according to their acquired gender. It further states the exceptions can only be applied on a case by case basis.

For clarity, the statutory guidance has to be taken into account by courts. And the EHRC defines trans people as people who intend, in the process of, or have reassigned their gender and the process does not have to be medical.

Sex is a protected characteristic, but it only provides the right not to be discriminated on the basis of your legal sex. It does not guarantee the right to single sex spaces (legal or biological).

I think most GC feminists would agree there are no longer single sex (in the biological) spaces. Where we disagree is whether this is a good thing.

Bowlofbabelfish · 03/08/2018 08:49

Thing is due to the EA spaces are gender segregated not sex segregated.

That is incorrect. Sex is a protected characteristic. Gender is not. Gender reassignment is.

Do you believe all single sex spaces should be removed sarahAr? How do you reconcile that with the fact that single sex spaces exist for the safety of women and children?

I’m sure you don’t want women and children to be harmed - so why do you support getting rid of single sex spaces??

SlartiAardvark · 03/08/2018 08:54

trans people should be treated according to their acquired gender.

Now I thought that this meant their gender according to their GRC - if they haven't got one, then they're still the Sex that's on their birth certificate surely??

It's the whole "self certification" thing that's the problem...

Agastache · 03/08/2018 09:00

I do wonder why so many born men are totally committed to the art of removing access to womens' and girls' spaces.

Now why would that be?

Agastache · 03/08/2018 09:02

She started that 2 years ago...bloody hell.

I suspect it might more traction now.

TerfsUp · 03/08/2018 09:04

Signed. If you have a penis you do not belong in female-only spaces.

happydappy2 · 03/08/2018 09:22

signed-sex segregation is so important for the safety of women, children & vulnerable adults-Sarah why on earth can you not see that? If any man cans self id as a woman & gain access to women only spaces, that puts genuine trans women with a GRC at risk of sexual assault as well. How can you justify your position?

Wanderabout · 03/08/2018 09:25

I think most GC feminists would agree there are no longer single sex (in the biological) spaces. Where we disagree is whether this is a good thing.

I don't agree that there are no longer effectively single sex spaces in the vast majority of cases. I do see that they are being threatened by stealth and are becoming fewer and this needs to be openly addressed by society as a whole.

SarahAr · 03/08/2018 11:17

Now I thought that this meant their gender according to their GRC - if they haven't got one, then they're still the Sex that's on their birth certificate surely?

I was paraphrasing. The actual text is clearer (section 13.57)

If a service provider provides single- or separate sex services for women and men, or provides services differently to women and men, they should treat transsexual people according to the gender role in which they present.

The gender role in which they present. So no GRCs needed.

FruitOnAPlatter · 03/08/2018 11:30

transsexual

not transgender.

If you're going to quibble over words, you should be clear about what those words mean - and in this circumstance, transsexual was intended to mean those making a meaningful transition, ie. following the process to get a GRC - not 'non-binary males who feel a bit feminine today'

SlartiAardvark · 03/08/2018 11:53

transsexual was intended to mean those making a meaningful transition, ie. following the process to get a GRC - not 'non-binary males who feel a bit feminine today'

Exactly - so people that are actually serious about it, not blokes with a beard in a dress that just want to be able to flash their cock (not looking at you Jess Bradley at all......)

Knicknackpaddyflak · 03/08/2018 12:01

Yes, yes, ok for the umpteenth time Sarah , you believe women and children are entitled to no privacy or dignity whatsoever from people with penises, in fact they are stupid and wrong for wanting privacy for people with penises and people with penises should go wherever they want and do whatever they want and people without penises should really stop believing they have any rights or entitlements of any kind. They should just be allowed to breathe, if they just take small breaths.

Wish you'd try explaining or justifying some of that instead of just re releasing the same thing over and over and over.

Waddlelikeapenguin · 03/08/2018 13:49

Go on sarahah explain to me & all the other mothers of young girls why you think it's ok for them to see a penis in the changing room Hmm

VickyEadie · 03/08/2018 14:08

I was alone in the gym changing room again today. As I took my shower, I realised just how vulnerable I was if a self-id person with a penis were allowed in, especially one who enjoyed wanking in public (or even worse pursuits involving their penis).

SarahAr could you explain to me why you think placing me in that position would be a good thing?

OrchidInTheSun · 03/08/2018 14:38

You missed off the next sentence Sarah which goes on to say: 'However, the Act does permit the service provider to provide a different service or exclude a person from the service who is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or who has undergone gender reassignment."

In good faith? Hmm

AWomanNamedSpartacus · 03/08/2018 14:54

Signed. Thanks for posting the link Mxyzptlk.

Great post Orchid! Flowers

SarahAr · 03/08/2018 15:02

You missed off the next sentence Sarah which goes on to say: 'However, the Act does permit the service provider to provide a different service or exclude a person from the service who is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or who has undergone gender reassignment."

In good faith? hmm

And then the guidance goes on to talk about when the exceptions can be used and the need for a case by case approach. My comment at Fri 03-Aug-18 08:38:03 mentioned this.