I would hope that policy is not solely based on stats but on need
How can need be established with an evidence base? Are you saying that actual evidence based policy is a mistake and should be replaced with a subjective assessment of need? How will that need be assessed? How can we protect against ‘need’ being defined by pressure groups behind closed doors? To take a medical analogy we do not treat patients based on opinion (well, we are trying our hardest to stamp it out) because it turned out, when we did research, that a lot of assumptions and beliefs about treatments were just wrong - and patients were dying (routine use of steroids in cardiac indications for example.) evidence based medicine is a much better way of treating patients.
and again I will say which none of you seen to want to acknowledge when they is competing need then there needs to be discussion and debate about how to accommodate those needs
Let’s be very clear about what happens when a want and a need collide. The need takes preference.
What you’re implying here is that women’s needs for safety should be compromised in some sort of negotiation. Many women on this board have expressed their opinion that NO is not the start of a negotiation. Women have rights to sex based protections enshrined in law and we will resist any degradation or removal of them.
When it comes to other alleged ‘need conflicts’ we get into child safeguarding as a topic. And there there is NO compromise. When it comes to child safeguarding rules, anything that will deliberately or inadvertently degrade or weaken those rules needs to be rejected out of hand.
I do hope that’s a stance you agree with? That child safeguarding is non negotiable? And that women’s rights to safety are non negotiable?
If not, it would be good if you could clarify exactly where you feel the conflicts are between women’s rights to safety/child safeguarding and the ‘needs’ you are talking about. And how you feel those needs outweigh current child safeguarding rules and the laws that protect women’s safety.