Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Cuts to sexual health services imminent.

58 replies

HelenaDove · 05/06/2018 23:38

www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-44353615

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 05/06/2018 23:41

Some sexual-health clinics face closure or reduced hours as almost half the councils in England plan to cut spending, a BBC investigation reveals.

Of the 151 councils that responded to a BBC Freedom of Information request, 72 planned to cut sexual-health funding in 2018-19 compared with 2017-18.

Most said any savings would be made through efficiencies, but 16 councils said services would be cut or reduced.

The government said councils were being given money to spend on services.
Rationing

The BBC's FoI request reveals:

Some clinics in Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Nottingham, Brighton and Hove, Doncaster and Norfolk are either facing closure or having to reduce their opening hours
People living in rural Suffolk have to travel further to access services following the closure of three clinics in April
Opening days for adult sexual-health services in Doncaster are being reduced from six to five a week
Cheshire East council plans to "restrict" free access to emergency contraception in pharmacies to women under the age of 25 because of the need to make "savings"
A popular clinic for students operating out of the Cripps Health Centre, on Nottingham University campus, lost its funding in March

"While we appreciate the value that discretionary services such as Cripps add to patient choice and access, during times of severe cuts to our operating budgets we cannot continue to provide those which are additional and complementary to core provision," Nottingham city council told the BBC.

Some councils, however, said they had managed to save money and improve services.

Waltham Forest, for example, said it would improve access by having more clinics and longer opening times, despite a drop in its budget.

Many areas are increasing the availability of home self-test kits, which can be ordered online.

And in London and Manchester "chem-sex" support groups have been set up to help those who use drugs as part of sexual activity.

Drug use in a sexual context increases the risk of transmission of HIV, hepatitis and other sexually transmitted infections, Public Health England has said.
Patients 'turned away'

Dr Anatole Menon-Johansson is clinical lead for sexual health at Guy's and St Thomas', in south London, as well as the clinical director for the charity Brook. His trust serves areas with some of the highest rates of sexually transmitted infections in the country, but reduced its clinics from six to three last year.

He said: "There is unmet need. STI rates are still very high. And we have clinics that are closing. The reality is it's not going to help.

"Last week, we turned away around 300 patients. However, this was around half the amount of patients we were turning away each week last year due to the measures we have put in place"

Dr Menon-Johansson said he had recently spoken to a patient who had gone to St George's hospital seeking help only to find the clinic there had been closed.

"He then went to the Vauxhall clinic and that had been closed. Then I saw him at the Walworth Road clinic, where it was third time lucky for him."
Harder to get an appointment

Having previously been diagnosed with genital warts, Liv Grosvenor, 24, from the North Norfolk coast, has regular check-ups, but her nearest sexual health clinic is now 25 miles away and an hour's drive.

It had moved to this less convenient location in 2015, Ms Grosvenor said, making it harder to reach by public transport.

"Since it's been moved and the funding's been cut, it's really difficult to access," she said.

Dr Olwen Williams, of the British Association for Sexual Health, said the FoI findings should "raise alarm bells".

"With the recent emergence of multi-drug resistant gonorrhoea and record levels of syphilis being detected, clinics are being closed at the worst possible time," she said.

The Royal College of Nursing also warned of a potential public health risk.

It said: "If people are not able to access services, then serious conditions go undiagnosed, untreated and spread further."

A government official said it had a "strong track record" on sexual health, with teenage pregnancies at an all-time low.

More than £16bn will have been given to councils to spend on public health over the five years from 2015 to 2020.

Responsibility for sexual health was taken away from NHS England and handed to councils in 2013.

Since then, STI testing and most contraceptive services have been overseen by local authorities.

In Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland public health services are still run by the NHS.

Izzie Seccombe from the Local Government Association said: "It's good news that we've got growing demand because that means that young people are taking their sexual health really seriously, and being responsible. But it is difficult for us to match growing demand with a reducing budget.

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 05/06/2018 23:41

There is a video in the link.

OP posts:
ConstantlyCold · 05/06/2018 23:44

Thanks for highlighting this. Really worrying.

Seems to me that cutting sexual health services will mean more STIs and possibly a higher number of abortions. Which will cost money, as well as causing emotional damage.

HelenaDove · 05/06/2018 23:45

As usual it will fall on women Sad

OP posts:
madamginger · 05/06/2018 23:50

Yet again it’s women who are most effected by cuts.
Our local service has been taken over by virgin care and is only open 2 hours a day (9-11am) which is useless for most people who work.

UpstartCrow · 06/06/2018 00:20

This is a false economy; sexual health preventative services save money in the long term.

Ereshkigal · 06/06/2018 00:27

YY Upstart. So short sighted.

UpstartCrow · 06/06/2018 00:32

From 2016;
''every pound spent on contraception saved £11 in averted health costs''

www.theguardian.com/society/2016/dec/12/council-cuts-hitting-womens-contraceptive-services-data-shows

So its not about saving money. I get the impression that the country is being run down in preparation for a big change.

J4nice · 06/06/2018 03:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NonSuchFun · 06/06/2018 05:05

This is terrible. I had no idea sexual health had been off loaded from the NHS to councils wholesale, where of course provision is bound to be piecemeal and subject to cuts. I knew Virgin had taken over quite a lot of these services but still thought it was under the auspices of the NHS.

NonSuchFun · 06/06/2018 05:10

We are so lucky with family planning provision in this country, thanks to the NHS.

This is a link to an article from USA which gives a glimpse of what we can expect if family planning goes the way of sexual health.
www.good.is/articles/birth-control-costs-more-than-you-think-even-for-the-lucky-ones

NonSuchFun · 06/06/2018 05:21

“"While we appreciate the value that discretionary services such as Cripps add to patient choice and access, during times of severe cuts to our operating budgets we cannot continue to provide those which are additional and complementary to core provision,"
Cuts to student clinics are particularly irresponsible - I would imagine they are heavy users and have less ability to travel to more distant clinics. Also, for many this is their first experience of living away from home and taking responsibility for their own health. It needs to be readily accessible for them.

There is nothing “discretionary” about sexual health. Especially when antibiotic super resistant bugs are emerging.

lightthedarkness · 06/06/2018 05:37

It's so short sighted! The long term consequences of cutting something that applies to so many young people.

ConstantlyCold · 06/06/2018 07:06

*upstart^

So its not about saving money. I get the impression that the country is being run down in preparation for a big change

It is about saving money. There’s no money today so services are being cut. I guess the councils will just deal with the consequences in a few years.

FermatsTheorem · 06/06/2018 08:07

Upstart may not be being tin-foil-hatty on this one. In the run up to rail privatisation, the then government deliberately let the routine maintenance programme slide in order to make the network look artificially more profitable than it actually was. Then of course the private companies were left with an under financed poorly maintained system. IIRC it was referenced in connection with the Hatfield crash in the subsequent enquiry: lack of routine inspections led to the corner gauge cracking not being picked up in time.

ChattyLion · 06/06/2018 08:13

This is horrible, burdens women disproportionately and less advantaged people, and younger people AND is entirely predictable.

This is what everyone said would happen when Andrew Lansley (Tory Health Sec) devolved public health funding to local councils ie No longer NHS funded directly.
Then did savage cuts to local council budgets.

I can look up the stats, but it’s something shocking like 30 or 40% cuts since pre-2010 when the coalition came in.

This was all predicted by the health think tanks and economists, not that you need to be an economist to know if you divest central government of something and then slash the budget that you will be slashing the service.

It’s infuriating. The government also slap their own backs about the decline in the teenage pregnancy rates over recent decades. Good luck with that in future. They couldn’t give a crap about keeping young people healthy and safe.

2cats2many · 06/06/2018 08:13

This is ideological. Many people in power do not believe in the public sector. As a result, it is being starved of funds and systematically run down.

You see it with the NHS, schools and local authorities.

What's next? Private companies step in to provide the services at a cost and to make a profit. Goodbye public sector. The vultures are circling already.

2rebecca · 06/06/2018 08:31

I was baffled by why the council was getting involved in family planning and sexual health clinics then saw in England they had passed clinics to councils. A mad decision as this is an integral part of the health services.
In Scotland they have (in theory but not really in practise) integrated health and social services but family planning/GU clinics are still ran by the health boards.

Bowlofbabelfish · 06/06/2018 08:35

get the impression that the country is being run down in preparation for a big change.

The NHS is being systematically run into the floor. In a few years there will be some sort of small pricing change introduced - nothing huge, probably just an access charge.
Then once that mechanism for pricing is in place the whole thing will be dismantled at great profit to a few and insurance based systems brought in.

VikingVolva · 06/06/2018 08:39

This is why it is bloody vital to get people to understand why their vote matters in local elections!

Not all councils are going about their new Public Health responsibilities in the same way. They should not be reducing the total public health spend, but may re-prioritise with it. It is local councillors who decide whether proposed changes pass.

SardineReturns · 06/06/2018 08:39

Gay men and straight women impacted most, first group is small in the scheme of things, second group is still demonized when it comes to sex related matters as we see from pp. Thing is straight women who are ill, has impact on children both already born and ? impact of these diseases on pregnancy/ baby.

Melamin · 06/06/2018 08:41

Maybe it will free up funds for the nhs to save lives

It never have and never will use a sexual health clinic because I don't sleep around and take risks

Well, I'm alright Jack Hmm

There are many, many people do not sleep around - you are not unique, but the system is there for if you are caught out. It is better for the public health, saves money and benefits everyone if there are services for everyone so that the general public is not going around riddled with syphilis and HIV and silent chlamydia, and that it is easily accessed.

I certainly do not begrudge sexual health clinics to anyone.

BoreOfWhabylon · 06/06/2018 08:44

And this in the same week that an upsurge in syphilis and gonorrhoea cases is reported.

CurbsideProphet · 06/06/2018 08:46

J4nice Confused

I went to a sexual health clinic to have my coil removed (that was in the wrong position and causing me a lot of pain), because my GP surgery refused to help. I don't know what I would have done if that clinic didn't exist.

Will we turn into one of those countries where patients have to show insurance / ability to pay costs before they receive treatment?

GibbertyFlibbert · 06/06/2018 08:46

In the good old days, everything was national. To fight cuts took a national campaign which sorted the problem everywhere. It was difficult but it was still possible to fight the Government.

The Government response was to break the public sector up into ever smaller pieces. Now anyone wanting to fight this has to do it one council at a time. The effort becomes disproportionate. So it doesn't happen and services close.

I suspect there is another motive. Gradually crank up the gaps in the NHS and more and more people will decide that health insurance is their only option. That's the political goal, I am sure.