So why isn't it equally the case that trans groups are best placed to decide what is best for trans children?
Trans groups that advocate and lobby on the topic of trans children are usually populated by parents of trans children.
Parents of trans children have a desperate incentive to validate the choices they have made on behalf of their children.
Look at how heated FF vs BF debates get on here. Full of parents desperate to justify and validate the choice they have made for their child. And the outcomes for BF vs FF kids are basically negligible.
Take that desperation to justify and validate parenting decisions and add in the high stakes of sterility and fear of suicide and you have a massive and dangerous bias towards any approach that validates your own choices. It would be impossible to retain an objective approach under these circumstances.
The bias parents have towards their own decisions is highly pervasive and I would say pretty much every parent has it, because the alternative is that you have failed your child, and that is tortuous.
People like Susie Green cannot be open to any other way of managing trans identified and gender non conforming children. Because otherwise they have to be open to the possibility that they have failed their child in an earth shattering way.
I know she gets a lot of stick here but I still feel wretched for Susie Green. Maybe I don’t need to and she doesn’t have a whiff of self doubt, but as a parent I find that hard to believe.