OK, blocking does not prevent me reading the thread while logged out, so I've seen it now. I haven't yet read the full report but @RuthPearce says Survey respondents argued that the proposed limit of 8 hair removal sessions is inadequate. This is usually insufficent to achieve an appropriate, permanent response, and techniques differ enormously (e.g. electrolysis takes longer to achieve results than laser hair removal).
They also want NHS services to provide facial feminisation surgery, phonosurgery, body hair removal, breast augmentation, and hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy .
The NHS is struggling to provide services that most people would agree are absolutely essential, so where's the money and staffing going to come from to provide these services? And also, why? Women with POCS don't get electrolysis on the NHS. Women who have completed their families and are desperate for sterilisation can't get it on the NHS. Women who have dreadful problems with endometriosis are not getting effective treatment.
I must say I find @RuthPearce's airy dismissal of the concerns of family and friends rather worrying. Who's there to pick up the pieces if a person transitions and is still unhappy, and especially if they then detransition? Proposed gender identity service specs allow for 17-year olds to be referred to adult services. Unsurprisingly, majority of service users and clinicians support this measure - opposition comes primarily from "family and friends" and "members of the public".