I would hope that the recent idea of talking about consent from pretty much birth would eventually pay dividends, but I don't hold out enormous hope.
Rapists know what rape is, it's not a mistake or an oversight or anything like it, they know what they're doing, and they know they will almost certainly get away with it even if the woman reports.
By present trends, it's estimated that a rapist has a 2 in 1,000 chance of being convicted for their crimes, those are very good odds of getting clean away with it. If you're the kind of man who gets his kicks from constantly watching women being raped every which way in porn, then those odds must look really enticing actually.
We have seen, from the enormous backlog of rape kits in various places in the USA which are only now being worked, that rapists rarely strike once. Maybe those men get a taste for it, or maybe they've weighed up the odds of getting caught, going to trial, being convicted and receiving an appropriate sentence? Given also that we know that the vast majority of rapes are committed by men that their victims know, it does raise questions about how these men are allowed to get away with it for as long as they are, and, if they are well off enough or charming enough how much longer they will get away with it, even if pulled in for questioning. Much of the world seems to spend a lot of time making excuses for these types of men, we've seen it on this thread even. None of these things are their victims' fault.
These examples are only in the West, when we know that rape is a worldwide problem and a well worn weapon of war and has been probably since the birth of patriarchal social systems. We make a huge error when we suggest that rapists in the West are somehow more honourable than their brothers in crime in the rest of the world.
I wonder, as a thought experiment, and without any judgement, how many of the men's legal teams would be willing to let their daughters, nieces, granddaughters go to a party those young men from Ulster Rugby attend?