LassWiADelicateAir
For what it's worth, I wasnt actually talking about John.
I was just addressing the comment you made about feminists saying men can wear female clothes and then complaining when they do.
Explaining the difference.
John has obviously thought long and hard about why they were being treated differently and has reached the right conclusion.
Perhaps I can explain it better by saying that some TIMs, like AGPs, aren't so much wearing female clothing because they like them, they're wearing them to become the thing that they are aroused by.
If every woman everywhere suddenly started to wear an eyepatch, for instance, they would wear that.
It's about acquiring their personal perception of what women are.
And, certainly in the case of AGPs, it's a demeaning perception, relying not just on stereotypes, but relying on the most damaging stereotypes.
Gender nonconforming it isn't.
It might look, from the outside, as though there is a contradiction, because of the gender busting viewpoint of feminists. But there really isn't.