Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Newsnight looking at issue of men!

104 replies

Walkingdead11 · 01/11/2017 22:39

On now.....

OP posts:
Seeingadistance · 02/11/2017 12:55

When I say "about this", I mean it was about men's predatory behaviour towards women, not about last night's programme.

Slimthistime · 02/11/2017 13:32

Datun "I’ve reached the conclusion that men, yes almost all of them, are incompetent, blind, sexist and simply live in an entirely different dimension to the one that I inhabit."

me too. I was going to watch this on catch up but I won't bother.

I hope Datun and OP won't mind me saying this here but it doesn't seem worth another thread - but all the years I have been accused of paranoia about men and their intentions - I was right. It is much easier to be physically stand offish so no one touches you and it's not missing out on anything that I haven't bothered making male friends for the last few years.

how does male suicide even appear in a discussion about men harassing women?!

Datun · 02/11/2017 13:35

and most significantly, do not behave like this to women who have the power to fire them!

Yeah funny that. This is all about power. And who has it.

SomeDyke · 02/11/2017 16:56

All the bleating about 'can't even look at a woman now'.......As a lesbian, I have managed to be around various women professionally for many years, including colleagues and students from many countries and different cultures. And for some strange reason, I manage to interact perfectly amicably without pawing people all the time, and without 'worrying' about normal interactions leading to being accused of sexual harassment. Because I know the difference, perhaps, between looking and leering. Because I don't feel an uncontrollable urge to help my female colleagues when they are doing ordinary stuff like walking (think Trump and Teresa) . Because I don't feel an uncontrollable urge to drape myself around someone when I'm trying to indicate something on a screen. Because most of my female colleagues, I frankly don't touch them. There is no need to. Because I realize that different cultures and different sexes mean that anything other than a firm handshake isn't always appreciated! Nor do I punch them on the arm, or put an arm around their shoulders or any of the other things that some men seem to feel are appropriate ways to behave to their male colleagues. And so far, as I said, I've not been accused of sexual harassment (although I have been accused of homophobia buts that's another whole can of worms!)

To paraphrase Professor 'Enry 'Iggins 'Why can't a man be more like a dyke!'

JumpingJellybeanz · 02/11/2017 17:21

I think I was most shocked at the survey results. They were presented in a 'at least we all agree on the extremes' kind of way eg 91% of people think pinching a woman on the bum is harassment, isn't that great, kind of thing. Err no it isn't because that means pretty much 1 in 10 people think it's ok, which is bloody awful and wasn't pointed out at all.

Slimthistime · 02/11/2017 17:55

SomeDyke - I hate the bleating too.

re this though "Because I don't feel an uncontrollable urge to help my female colleagues when they are doing ordinary stuff like walking (think Trump and Teresa)"

I thought that was the other way around - he needs a hand walking over slopes or something, to aid with balance? (I mean physical balance, clearly there's no helping Dump's mental balance).

Seeingadistance · 02/11/2017 22:46

Newsnight better tonight with Kirsty Wark, 2 women and one man.

Ah, but the man has now started mansplaining! FFS!

OlennasWimple · 02/11/2017 22:53

I don't touch my colleagues either, male or female, unless I know for certain that the contact will be welcomed (colleague leaving do when he is going round giving everyone goodbye hugs, for example). Funnily enough, it works quite well

KarlosKKrinkelbeim · 02/11/2017 22:57

This confected outrage from men is ridiculous. I have worked in a number of different environments over the last 20 years and in none of them did make employees ever touch female colleagues bar a handshake.
Everyone knows what the rules are. They’re not hard to understand and not painful to follow.

TinklyLittleLaugh · 03/11/2017 00:22

Anyone seen This Week tonight? Andrew Neil basically taking the piss out of events in Westminster, implying the sexual misconduct issue is all a bit silly, ha ha ha. Portillo being a completely out of touch and devoid of insight. Harriet Harman utterly inept in getting her point across. And worst of all Edmina Curry being a victim blaming handmaiden. Possibly the worst behaviour I have ever seen by a woman on the media, in terms of failing to support other women.

ForestDad · 03/11/2017 00:38

I watched the prog last night, here's my 2p:
Wouldn't reasonable to have an all-female show entitled "the problem with men" would it? I think that the male "audience" was broadly representative of men in society from some guys telling people off for victim-blaming to ?the majority who seemed confused by the issues. I felt sorry for the guy who said he never touched anyone.
The bald guy on the panel was a long way off though.
Going back to the points about harassment in the workplace/life, there seem to be some people (more men than women) who don't have enough empathy to understand when they are making someone uncomfortable. From uncomfortably long handshakes, overfamiliarity etc. these people don't seem to be aware what they are doing. Wrong but generally not malicious. Can be difficult to discern this from...
other people who do the same things (and worse) but specifically for their own gratification. They may try to excuse this as "harmless fun" etc. but they know why they are doing it. At the risk of stating the obvious this is wrong.
The point that flower hair guy from Rizzle kicks was trying to make was I think to do with the reasons why men are the way they are. Yup, I'm mansplaining! But unless you address the causes of issues you won't solve them, telling men "don't harass women" without looking a bit deeper is a populist simplistic solution to a deep complex problem.

AssassinatedBeauty · 03/11/2017 00:41

How do these poor unempathetic men manage not to do it to other men? Are they capable of understanding when they might be making a man feel uncomfortable, but not a woman?

Slimthistime · 03/11/2017 00:48

Forest " But unless you address the causes of issues you won't solve them, telling men "don't harass women" without looking a bit deeper is a populist simplistic solution to a deep complex problem."

It's not a complex problem. It doesn't require a complex study.

Don't touch, don't make sexual remarks, don't make personal remarks. Sorted.

ForestDad · 03/11/2017 00:51

ABeauty, not sure! Perhaps because men are generally worse at hiding their feelings, like if someone's being inappropriate my "f off" face kicks in long before I've noticed and they pick up on that. Or because I'm wrong and all men who are inappropriate are just lecherous gits.

(At the risk of going on about men), we generally make each other uncomfortable in different ways, probably not sexual but say intimidating physically or mentally, saying inappropriate things, asking inappropriate Qs etc. But you can't really compare it because in the straight population there isn't that sexual dynamic, which I guess is the point!

ForestDad · 03/11/2017 00:53

Slim if it was that simple it would be sorted. Lots of people are killed or hurt in car accidents or when they get drunk.
Simple solution, don't crash your car or drink too much.

See? I've solved the problems.

Slimthistime · 03/11/2017 01:08

Forest, that is not a valid comparison.

Also you mention dealing with the causes of the issues. What does that mean?

Datun · 03/11/2017 01:19

Don't touch, don't make sexual remarks, don't make personal remarks. Sorted.

And this is completely correct.

The reason this doesn’t work is because men continue to feel that they have an entitlement to women. Whether it’s touching them (however lightly on non-sexual), or not caring if their behavior is intimidating. Or, quite often, relying on it.

Thankfully, they are now realising they are completely wrong.

AssassinatedBeauty · 03/11/2017 01:25

So you think women are better at "hiding their feelings" than men. Can you think of any reasons why that might be the case? Why might women have developed ways to hide their disgust/fear/anger/upset?

I'm sure you realise but you're essentially placing responsibility for this on women. Women don't respond in a way that prevents harassment, and it is inevitable that (heterosexual) men will want to harass women as it's part of the "sexual dynamic".

ForestDad · 03/11/2017 01:32

It is valid because they are both complex problems that won't be fixed by telling people "don't touch anyone". Things don't just happen. There are reasons/causes for them. In a society human behaviour is shaped and caused by many different factors and these make the society the way it is.

As an example I grew up in the 90s when the lad culture was the crucible of male identity. It was cool to objectify women and the general feeling was that promiscuity was brilliant and having long-term fulfilling relationships was boring. Because of this I aspired to it, despite not actually being what I wanted which I've now come to realise. Not being able to achieve what I thought I wanted made me a bit miserable.
Are things better or worse now I don't really know. It seems that there is more tolerance and that people are more likely to be accepted for who they are than they were 20 years ago, but perhaps that's just because I'm older and see more diversity.

ForestDad · 03/11/2017 01:45

Abeauty - I'm not going to fall into your well-laid trap again of telling you what women are like/are thinking etc. just so you can tell me I'm wrong.
I do think you have to be really careful when talking about the touching thing though. Saying "all touching is wrong" is ridiculous. I have many friends and family and we shake hands/hug/kiss on cheek/put arm around each other when happy/sad/affectionate etc. This is not wrong. Unless you are more specific you will alienate more people than you influence.

Slimthistime · 03/11/2017 01:47

Forest, none of that gives any reason that men can't follow the rules I stated.

Slimthistime · 03/11/2017 01:49

Forest " Saying "all touching is wrong" is ridiculous"

Has anyone on this thread said that? Why are you talking about friends and family?!

AssassinatedBeauty · 03/11/2017 01:56

Have you heard of the Rock test, Forest? Just treat all women that aren't your family or friends like you'd treat The Rock/Dwayne Johnson and you'll be fine. It's not rocket science.

Datun · 03/11/2017 01:57

Forest. If you’re not sure, don’t touch. It’s not that difficult.

Or ask would I touch a man this way? If the answer is no, don’t do it.

MyNameIsLola · 03/11/2017 02:08

Jumping the statistics used last night really jumped out at me too. I agree completely that 91% of men thinking pinching a woman’s bum isn’t okay is depressing. But what really pissed me off most was that they only surveyed men. How about what percentage of women are happy to have their bum pinched/leg touches. Because surely that’s the statistic that actually matters. I don’t give a flying fuck if a man thinks he’s fine to touch me anywhere, if I don’t want him to then it’s my choice.

Swipe left for the next trending thread