Going back to my teens - if you can get Cagney and Lacey on DVD through Amazon it was brilliant. And Nine to Five is hilarious.
Getting back to the "no means no" discussion in Deborah Cameron's book, I find a really useful mental trick to play is to move the focus off women's behaviour and onto men's. Because time after time, the excuses for bad behaviour by some men seem to centre round treating men as a force of nature like a hurricane or an earthquake, and assuming the onus is on women to take evasive action. It becomes much more interesting when every time someone makes an assertion about women's behaviour, you turn that round and ask "how is the man behaving?" and crucially, "under what similar circumstances would he behave differently?"
So - threads on here where a woman is bemoaning her husband being a lazy slob, and loads of posters pop up saying "you have to understand that men don't see dirt", or "you have to train him," or "you have to spend some of your precious time and mental energy writing him a step by step list, then accept he'll still get it wrong." Turn it round. A man who has a workshop (carpentry, car maintenance) - does he put up with that being cluttered and messy because "he can't see dirt"? Nine times out of ten no. A man who has a task he wants to do - does he need training like a dog, or does he take the initiative and learn what he needs to? Does he expect his boss in the workplace to lead him through tasks step by step and accept that he'll still only do a half-arsed job? No.
And victim blaming in sex crimes. "It was what she was wearing." So, short skimpy skirt, knickers showing, long beautiful toned legs on display, strappy dress - do we see men throwing themselves onto centre court to molest the female players at Wimbledon? Of course we don't - surprise surprise they can control themselves in those circumstances.
Or "things had gone so far he couldn't stop himself." Imagine the randiest male on the planet, a teenage boy - he's sneaked his girlfriend into his bedroom, his mum walks in to collect the laundry. Can he stop mid thrust in those circumstances? Course he can.
And so on and so on... once you start asking questions about supposedly uncontrollable male urges, hardly any stand up to scrutiny. One might almost think it was being used as an excuse to hide behind...
So, everytime people blame women for men's bad behaviour, turn it round - insist on focusing on the men instead. Prostitution? Sex pozzie types try to tell you you're castigating women's "choices" to enter prostitution. No, I'm not, I'm castigating men's choices to use and abuse women's bodies. Ditto porn. Ditto sexual violence.