To be honest I'm not quite sure if money beats morality, I'd say sometimes maybe siding with yes but I believe that in most big money industries at least in entertainment so actors/ singers etc ( which is why I don't think this example shows whether it would be damaging to an ordinary Joe ) and with football because I think generally there are so many clubs not just in England, but worldwide that there's always gonna be one that's desperate enough to take the heat and the first club was always going to be the hardest to get .
I don't think it's as widespread as most think, footballers are generally well behaved, as cases like CE and Adam Johnson did leave a big wave in the sport in this country as it's unheard of, unlike in other sports like the NFL where violent crimes are a lot more common and punished a lot less severely.
Whilst a lot less common I think people are more focused on CE because it got a lot of focus and it's a case people can get behind, thinking it's systemic but not having a big knowledge of other cases. I also think there's a misconception on football fans ideas as the majority have sided with the victim in the CE case from what I've seen and were astounded when Sunderland let Adam Johnson keep playing after he was charged.
It's weird I don't mean to defend CE but legally he's not done anything wrong so it's a moral issue and whilst I think it's morally wrong, it' easier to defend for a business and its not me making the decision and with millions at stake I can understand that they are willing to take the heat ( in a business sense) as football fans are fickle that if he does well fans won't treat him as badly, and the opposition is short lived from outside, as i understand it there wasn't much from outside football not long after he signed for chesterfield.