Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Triple-double peak trans extra-ultra.

85 replies

Miffer · 06/03/2017 22:14

I literally cannot even begin to imagine the level of cognitive dissonance the writer of this article had to employ.

Sorry if this is a repost.

And sorry for not really offering a point of view or starting point for discussion.... but.... just look...

www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/seen-missing-woman-dressed-man-seen-derbyshire/story-29207361-detail/story.html

OP posts:
M0stlyBowlingHedgehog · 07/03/2017 19:13

Yes, I know that Quentin, but I was hoping for a way of phrasing it that would spare me the ban hammer - quote the relevant bit of the 2003 act and leave the readership to connect the dots themselves.

Datun · 07/03/2017 19:25

You can't call yourself legally a woman unless you have a gender reassignment certificate. And have been living as a woman for two years. Has he done that? If not it is illegal to call him a woman.

QuentinSummers · 07/03/2017 19:27

It's so flipping annoying. Female is a biological term and applies to all sexually reproducing organisms including plants.

ChewingGumIsNice · 07/03/2017 19:34

That article is horrifying! At first I thought it was just ridiculous that they used a picture of Hauxwell to illustrate how women can be sex offenders too. But now I think it's more sinister. It's probably been done on purpose to try to counter all the peak trans moments that will be occurring after people find out about Hauxwell. Because it's basically saying women can be sex offenders too so it's ok to say that Hauxwell is a woman. I don't know if I've explained that right but it's like they realise that women are waking up to the madness so they are applying more and more gaslighting to keep us drunk on the kool aid.
Makes me want to cry.

Barcoo2 · 07/03/2017 20:15

The telegraph sub-eds are clearly taking the piss out of that academic with her plaintive 'women are predators too', by posting those images. Smile

WitchingHour666 · 07/03/2017 20:57

I think a firm stand has to be taken on the 'misgendering' situation full stop. The trans ideology dictates that pronouns should be used to describe gender, however, pronouns have always been used to describe sex, not gender. For example we don't call a woman mr or he if she wears a shirt and tie, we use the pronouns for her sex not her gender (which is just a harmful social role) and always have done.

Moreover, in reality most people do not really believe that someone can change sex, but they want to be 'nice' and 'polite' and so use the incorrect pronouns for an individuals sex. Well meaning people by humouring believers of trans ideology (calling them the incorrect pronoun for their sex) has allowed the trans ideology to get as far as it has. It has given legitimacy to the ideology and the impression that most people believe in it, when in fact that is not the case.

Of course women have been socialised from birth to be 'nice' and 'polite' (particularly to men), this has allowed men to take advantage of women's socialisation and use it to manipulate women into giving them what they want. In this case that is validation of their belief in an ideology (that men can become women). Humouring men by using the incorrect pronoun for their sex has allowed them to then take it further still, i.e. they have gotten away with that bit of manipulation and gaslighting and so they move on to more extreme forms. For example they claim that a penis is female, that males should be allowed in women's spaces, and so on.

This is classic behaviour of abusive males and is why many women who have been in abusive relationships previously instantly recognise it as such. This sort of abusive gaslighting and manipulation of females on such a societal scale, is of course extremely harmful to females in a practical sense, and also in a psychological sense. It is no coincidence that many middle aged men who adopt trans ideology are diagnosed with narcissism and other personality disorders.

Clearly trans ideology is harmful to females on many levels it must be opposed. The first step in doing that I believe, is by refusing to give legitimacy to it by using the incorrect pronoun for someones sex. Once the core of the ideology is rejected then everything else starts to crumble. Believers in this ideology of course will fight tooth and nail to stop women from doing this, e.g. They will claim we are bigots, meanies, and so on, but I believe it must be done in order to make any real progress.

MercyMyJewels · 07/03/2017 21:39

I agree witching. I do want to be nice (because I am) to the reasonable trans people out there, but I also think that if they are reasonable then they will understand WTAF is going on. In any case, I already do not use incorrect pronouns and instead refer to people by their names, not pronouns. I don't 'misgender'. But I will not tell lies

Gingernaut · 07/03/2017 23:45

I'm sorry, but trans-women who sexually assault their victims with their penises are men.

Just that. Men. Piss taking, attention seeking men. There's nothing female or womanly about raping someone.

OverthinkingSpartacus · 08/03/2017 01:53

The Craig Hauxley case has really got to me today, and I can't articulate why, I've been trying to post all afternoon but can't make sense to myself so have just been reading.

If the telegraph had used Lisa's case to highlight that most sexual offences are carried out by men it shoudlnt be ignored that transwomen rape and commit sexual offences too and used Lisa's case an example there'd be fucking hell on.

Maybe crimes should be recorded as man/woman transman/transwoman? It would be interesting to see the comparisons between the number of sexual crimes carried out by women to those carried out by trans women.

Dh rang this evening and has said that the men hes with (also locals) have been talking about it tonight, he's listened to me rant about things I've read on Mumsnet over the last few years and id thought it all went over his head but he's been telling them about the concerns about refuges, women's sports etc and he said its been an eye opener for them.

I haven't spoke to anyone who knew about this prior to yesterday's news articles and crime watch show. A couple of dhs colleagues live in Newton aycliffe and were only aware of the concerned for missing woman stuff from months ago.

A few on Facebook are saying they feel that as the crimes were committed in 2001 by Craig, but he was Lisa when victims reported and charges brought in 2015, that police didn't want to appear transphobic by highlighting Lisa was once male, but that it would be upsetting for the victims if Police/local media presented their attacker as a female when it was a female who attacked and raped them So tried to not say anything at all. I know it sounds crazy, but after reading some of the stuff I have today nothing would suprise me anymore...

NineReasons · 08/03/2017 08:42

Are crimes committed by trans women being recorded as crimes by women, is that really true?

If it is, do we we need to start recording the truth ourselves? A thread without chat just recording each and every published story where the crime is incorrectly attributed to women, capturing all the local media stories as well as ones that make national headlines?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page