Would be grateful for help clarifying my thoughts on this, please.
I live in Streatham.
Recently a business development organisation has started painting local vacant shopfronts with pictures alluding to local celebs and landmarks..there is one painted like the callbox in doc who as Roger Moore was brought up here for example.
There is one for Cynthia Payne and it makes me very uncomfortable.
She did pull off some kind of pr coup where she portrayed herself as providing harmless social fun (describes herself as a 'party hostess' FFS) when she was sent to prison for 6 months running a brothel.
I have read the appeal court judgement and Lord Justice Lawton is at pains to refute all the rubbish spouted about it being full of high profile clients mingling at a Christmas party and pointed out that no such person was found on the premises but on average 25 men a day paid for sex there day in and day out....
I think the thing I find most galling is the hype that they paid using luncheon vouchers has been bought into- they are the main image of this shopfront-
Yet what actually happened is that the men paid £25 on the door, were given a luncheon voucher as a token, had sex using the voucher which the sex worker would be given £8 for at the end of the night.....less than a third of the money.
I mentioned it to my next door neighbour who thought I was being very precious, and also said that it can't be exploiting women if a woman was in charge of the thing....
I don't have any sort of feminist education or the language or tools by which I can really explain why I find this so wrong. I just know instinctively pretending it is all harmless fun/rather glamorous is wrong, and I object to having to go past this shop every day with my little boy.
Any thoughts welcome...