Your language is worryingly identical to the misogynists and MRAs that we get from time to time on this board. You do realise that don't you? You seem like using the exact same language of these misogynists and MRAs. Why is that? Do you also post on the Red Pill? Or PUAs?
And what about coming into a feminist space and telling a woman what to do? You claim not to be a misogynist, but surely that wouldn't sit well with your 'feminist' sensibilities? Or would you claim yourself to be an 'equalitist'? Again I will ask this - how does that sit with your conscience? That you claim to not be a misogynist (but you haven't said you actually are a feminist either) yet you can't treat a woman as an equal?
Actually, no I don't 'have a go' just to disagree and wish to 'silence'. Just because I have disagreed with you on 2 occasions, you are seeing a very one-sided view. Why do you think that posters here still interact with me if I am controversial all the time? Because I am not, and they see the value in me posting here. Just because I disagree with you, 'As A Man', is that problematic for you? Do you prefer your women to just agree with you and never bring up a view that is different? Are you not able to manage views that are different from yours?
And please read through the thread again and again and again, until you understand it clearly. Shall I paraphrase what has gone on to make it easier for you? I said that I disagreed with what you said. You said "Well, my expertise in not in that area of contracts, however, my experience is still more valid than [a woman] who does have experience in this area." Then I pointed this out to you, and you insulted me, by saying "Well your work must be shit." Gosh, what a marvelous feminist you are!