Feminism funded by the Rockefellers to break up marriage and family

[Organic100]

For many years I always knew deep down that feminism had an agenda. It was obvious to me that it was a man hate movement, masquerading as equality. But not so long ago I discovered, from a man who use to be friends with one of the Rockefellers, that the Rockefellers funded feminism in the 1960's for the purpose of creating a battle of the sexes, to get women into work so they could be taxed, and to cause conflict between the genders. They wanted fathers out the way and wanted to make women independent. But when you think about it, many women today are dependent on the state. If many women are dependent on the state, then they're not really independent are they? What the Rockefellers wanted was to make women dependent on the state instead of their husbands. Look up on google, "How the Rockefellers re-engineered women."

Oooo! Are you The Elite? Do you have a monogrammed bathrobe and a well-coiffed lizard ruff?

I've skimmed the links. I want to know what on earth (or possibly, some other planet) happened to that Russo bloke between directing Trading Places and directing that America From Freedom to Fascism bollocks.

Organic100 doing a few searches turns up some info about Gloria Steinmen that suggests that she was in the pay of the CIA. It should be noted that also at this time the CIA owned approx 200 news/media companies across the globe.

"In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA´s Cord Meyers to direct an "informal group of activists" called the "Independent Research Service." This was part of Meyer´s "Congress for Cultural Freedom," which created magazines like "Encounter" and "Partisan Review" to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism"

I'm going to buck the trend on this thread and suggest that what happened at the end of the 60's in response to the civil rights movement which was essentially marxist/communist, is that the capitalist class/politicians/states/bankers (incl Rockefella and several other trusts) realised that neo-lib economics combined with media support for single issue identity politics would ensure that we fought amongst ourselves. Single issue politics whether it be liberal feminism, gay rights or race equality is beneficial to capitalism. We can campaign and talk about everything and anything except one thing......class

I think this helps to explain why capitalism has subsumed into itself all the gains made in the 60s. I would also add that the biggest beneficiaries of the feminisation of labour has been the capitalist, not women. Under advanced capitalism the assault upon what it is to even be a women and the commodification of women is certainly not something that feminists in the late 60's were fighting to achieve.

So a fairer analysis might conclude that liberal feminism under the protection of liberalism & neo-liberalism has been pushed into the mainstream as a way of defanging and de-radicalising feminism and creating divisions within left wing politics.

Every time the OP disappears, it's because he's run off into the bathroom with his ruler and his magnifying glass. Because the reason for his desperate attempt to Speak Da Troof is the same one that drives all misogynists - obsessive anxiety about his willy, and the fear that we are going to shrink it.
Oh yes we are, mate.

Why would a capitalist like Rockefeller care how much money a government received in tax? Capitalists want women to work so that they can spend money on products sold to them by capitalists.

Damn, I've been giving my feminism away for free all these years..
#iwantmymoney

I'm confused. Probably because I am a poor, stupid feminist. Can I be a feminist, married to a man, be a lizard and receive free money? I want it all.

I think I might be a lizard. how can I tell?

That's what got us here Terry so shut up and go make your husband a sandwich.

How many eyelids do you have, eccentrica?

I always knew feminists were not the brightest of sparks, but I never knew they were this dumb lol.

Lol indeed, Organic. We are truly fortunate to have you here patiently explaining things to us.

Another here to thank Organic for helping her realise the error of her ways, with just one thread from your fine self I have totally re-evaluated my value and belief system in order to fully service my husband.

Throws down briefcase, storms out of board meeting and goes to find a pinny and make rounds of teeney tiny finger sandwiches with the crusts cut off how he likes 'em

Oh and I will bake a too

But apparently you're supposed to make the "supreme sacrifice", Boosterseat. Is there not a bullet somewhere you could throw yourself in front of? After you've made the cake, obviously.

Didn't, not never. Now run along, grown ups are working here!

Minitheminx, I think I love you.

Why would a capitalist like Rockefeller care how much money a government received in tax?

Seems odd does it not, if Rockefeller "ruled" the world you would see something deliberate, instead we see banks and business, economists and neo-libers calling for a small state with little taxation, whilst simultaneously stoking up nationalism because capitalism falls on its face when the state doesn't act to protect it. I suspect that most uber wealthy people want the plebs to pay tax because they want to avoid underwriting the expense of the state, a state that exists to serve their interests. Do they care how much tax? no of course not, only that WE pay it and NOT them.

I'm sure that most activism is either infiltrated or underwritten by shadow states or the likes of the Rockefellas, this isn't new and has been happening since the 50's.

Just look at this government of corporate cock sucking puppets, Gove goes on holiday with the man commissioned to bin packed lunches, Landsley chummy with American insurance companies long before the coalition took charge, Osborne's family benefiting from fracking.....and that's just what we know about. That's a conspiracy, a conspiracy against us, where the capitalist class act to control, create and perpetuate a consensus in the mainstream that allows even the most crooked anti-democratic behaviour to go unchecked. I'm not a theorist but anything pushed to the margins in this debate is "conspiracy" whereas the conspiracy to control and exploit the masses is fact, within mainstream discourse this analysis is conspiracy theory. Why?

But Ho Hum, Organic is simply here to attack women, as if feminism is a special case, that shows just how misogynist he is because he could have chosen any number of single issue groups to attack.

I suspect poor Organic has had difficulty finding the kind of woman he wants, who will service his needs however peculiar they are.. so he's come to try and convince us that we need to conform to the 'little woman' role

Bwahahaha I wish him luck with that :o

Blood and sand! Now Im going to have to take a bullet for him.

Meh, scars are sexy anyway.

We'll play the last post in your honour boosterseat

You'd better, Boosterseat, or I'll have to send you a special cupcake decorated with white feathers. Made from marzipan, of course. With just a tiny bit of white wine vinegar to keep the royal icing really white. (See, FWR threads with cake-decorating hints. What could be more in keeping with the Rocker-lizard agenda?)

It's a refreshing change from the usual anti feminist threads.

It has been an honor and a privilege to stand alongside you ladies, alas i must leave to enter lifelong servitude and bask in the maternal glow of my sacrifice before throwing myself in front of a bullet whilst declaring "remove your pubic hair girls, its the only way to keep him happy...."

What a legacy.

This will be the cake - minus the happy birthday