Feminism funded by the Rockefellers to break up marriage and family

[Organic100]

For many years I always knew deep down that feminism had an agenda. It was obvious to me that it was a man hate movement, masquerading as equality. But not so long ago I discovered, from a man who use to be friends with one of the Rockefellers, that the Rockefellers funded feminism in the 1960's for the purpose of creating a battle of the sexes, to get women into work so they could be taxed, and to cause conflict between the genders. They wanted fathers out the way and wanted to make women independent. But when you think about it, many women today are dependent on the state. If many women are dependent on the state, then they're not really independent are they? What the Rockefellers wanted was to make women dependent on the state instead of their husbands. Look up on google, "How the Rockefellers re-engineered women."

[Prawnofthepatriarchy]

What an amazing OP. What a dick. And the response from assorted FWR posters? Very, very funny.

[welshgendercrit]

The Rockefellers knew that empowering women would lead to a decline in marriage and strong family units. I guess they were right

As someone who lived through the 60s as a feminist and celebrated her 51st wedding anniversary last week, what I want to know is when do I get my Rockefeller dosh? Pensions don't go as far as they used to.

I know it's a zombie thread, but it still made my day. Side-splitting stuff.

[deepwatersolo]

Jellyslice not sure about that. People who are trans fully identify with their trans identity. If you are a crypto-whatever, I don‘t think you even know you are this crypto-thing? But that is something OP could probably shed light on. Any comment, OP?