Seemingly pole dance in fact has ancient roots in India and China and wasn't in fact invented for the entertainment of men in seedy clubs.
Whatever its history, it's a great way to keep fit - and you really do need to be fit to do it.
I'm surprised by some of the assumptions of posters on this thread - especially the idea that pole fitness participants prance around in high heels and are unwilling to 'sweat or grunt'
. I think anyone making that assumption is likely to have fallen prey to the 'glamorisation' of pole dancing more than people who've given it a go and have the blisters and muscle ache to prove it.
So perhaps 'pole fitness' gives some insight into how hard professional pole dancers really work.
Why no hand wringing about other sports derived from activities that human beings wouldn't have freely chosen to participate in, by the way? (Have outlined a few in earlier posts - could also add fencing, shooting, treadmills at the gym...)
To my mind, taking the approach that women should restrict their activities to those that aren't deemed 'sexual' indulges misogynists who'd like to degrade and inhibit women whenever they're seen engaging in free physical activity.
I've already mentioned some of the remarks I've heard made about women and equestrianism. And heaven forbid that you should mention your attending belly dancing classes to anyone who wants to imagine that since you're female you must be:
a) desperate to flaunt sell your sexual wares;
b) without entitlement to participate in any activity that any passing creep might deem as sexually 'inviting' without 'asking for it' if you're subsequently harassed or attacked;
c) responsible for the degradation of other women (as an alternative, or by dint of b))
And/or:
d) unable to make free choices of any sort in a 'patriarchy'.
I'm not sure whether I'm amused or perplexed by KRITIQ's comparison between the roots of belly and pole dance, particularly in light of later posts about the extent to which women's choices are denuded within 'the patriarchy'.
What does seem obvious to me is that targetting other women's choices for censure is a dubious way of trying to advance women's rights and status.