Actually, that ultrasound law is so INFORMED consent can be provided, as she will have an opportunity to know what the unborn life looks like and hear its heartbeat. Official figures show that the majority of gynaecologists always or frequently use trans-vaginal sonography in TOPs in order to perform the operation, and that the woman cannot refuse, because it is part of the process of doing it safely. The woman must consent for an abortion in the first place, so she is not having anything done to her forcibly.
The women who call it "rape" miss something very big: penetration must be sexual for it to be rape (by any definition- if we take the mainstream definition we must also account for the fact that the ultrasound device is not a penis.) A medical professional inserting a device into the vagina to detect the position and gestational age of the life in the womb- and DO NOT say an abdominal ultrasound works, as all medical texts indicate it is less sensitive and specific than trans-v, doctors aren't doing it for the patriarchal heck of it- is part of the surgical procedure. It is not a sex act. To call something like this a "war on women" diminishes the experience of everyone who has suffered in genuine wars, including my relatives who perished in the Holocaust.
As for the second law, parents faced with a disabled baby that will be a strain on their finances should be given money to help, but calling it "wrongful birth" is just horrible, as it betrays an attitude that they shouldn't be alive. Every human with disabilities deserves to live. In most cases I've heard of it is a married couple and both parents have to face the disabled child, so it is not anti-woman.