This is a review of a book that I finished reading a few weeks ago (#54 of 77 books finished so far this year). I have criticisms of this book but found it interesting - I suspect some of you might hate this one though.
Pink-Pilled: Women and the Far Right by Lois Shearing
I borrowed this book from the library because the title caught my eye in a list of recent acquisitions. Why do women become involved in fascist and far right organisations here in the UK and in other countries? What part is the internet playing?
This is published by Manchester University Press, and like many academic books it comes with very detailed endnotes, comprising around 10 per cent of the text, and an index. The writing style is fairly accessible although the author uses quite a lot of contemporary terminology frequently used online, and associated with discussions of the far right and alt right, also of sexuality and gender identity on social media. Lois Shearing has worked for women's magazines like Cosmopolitan writing about sex and relationships. They describe themselves online as a bisexual activist and now identify as non-binary, though Shearing does acknowledge that in when researching this book, they would have presented as a wite woman.
The research described in the book includes a lot of looking at websites as well as some online and face to face interactions with women active in far right organisations. Pink-pilled is in 7 chapters - defining "girl-fascism", the extent of support from women for the current US government, some history of 20th century women's involvement in fascism, the far right's vision of women's role, how women are radicalised.
I found this book quite interesting and disturbing but also, at times, frustrating. Shearing's research is quite focused on individual experiences, how the far right recruits and views women as individuals. There is not so much about right wing women's organisations. Nor is there much about collective responses and resistance, and how those of us who are horrified by fascism and the far right can offer alternatives. The book is quite short with fairly limited space, and sometimes feels quite superficial.
And while at the beginning the author describes their surprise at reading Andrea Dworkin and finding more that they can agree with than they expected, and they acknowledge that there are different types of feminism, and disagreeing with another feminist writer's views does not necessarily mean that they are right wing, some complexities are not really acknowledged through the book. This is particularly problematic when the author refers to gender identity. While the far right and more traditional conservatives are happy to make use of concerns about gender identity, there are many women on the left who are also concerned about women's rights, space for women, erasure etc. I do not regard myself as gender critical, but the polarisation of the debates on this have left a lot that has not been satisfactorily discussed.
So I am not entirely satisfied with this book, but I think it is worth a read.