There are very few books that I re-read (on the basis that there are so many books I haven't read yet) but 'The Secret History' is on that short list. It stands up well every single time. And it has spawned so many pale imitations. Can't say I hold it against the authors who seek to emulate it in some way, who wouldn't love to create a book like that?
Been on holiday this week, so I have read
'Don't Forget We're Here Forever' by Lamorna Ash - supposedly 'a generation's search for religion'. Not really - more like 'one self-absorbed person's dabbling with some branches of Christianity'. It was okay, interesting in places.
'Bog People' - a working class folk horror anthology. As with most anthologies, some stronger than others, but some writers I'll definitely pursue.
'On the Calculation of Volume lll' by Solvej Balle - the third installment of this existential sort of sci-fi thing. It's hard to define, but it's well written. There's definitely a diminishing returns thing going on with the series but I'll probably be back for IV and V, or whatever number she's up to now, in due course.
'Courtiers' by Lucy Worsley - full of gossipy snippets on the Georgians, mostly George II. A relaxing read but you end up feeling a little improved, so win-win.
'Powers and Thrones' by Dan Jones. Also history light, this one covers the entire middle ages, all in 700 pages or so. I found it engaging and not too taxing.
'The Golden Rule' by Amanda Craig. I swear I've read something by Amanda Craig previously and quite enjoyed it, but that does not apply here. It was a sort of updated 'Strangers on a Train' but there was a large dose of poltics interwoven throughout, mostly in a hectoring tone. Even when it was politics I agreed with, I didn't really want to be beaten round the head with it. It came out a few years ago, I think, and was trying a bit hard to be a state-of-the-nation novel, but it already felt dated and like the politics spoiled what was a decent story. I found it off-putting, but maybe it's just not for me.