Book number two finished: The Secret Barrister. This has been reviewed a few times here I think, as well as mentioned fairly often on this year’s thread. The (anonymous at the time of publication) barrister makes the case that the legal system is somewhat messed up from top to bottom in the UK.
I found it interesting enough, but also a little bit depressing in general. I don’t really know much about the legal system but the case for the institutions involved in UK law being underfunded and under severe strain seems about right. Other people I know tell me that the health service is the same, ditto education. It just feels like a general malaise has crept in to life in the UK. This isn’t a party political point by the way, it just feels like a general trend over the last few decades. And so, although by every objective measure life is better now than it was in the past, it seems sometimes as though we haven’t had as much of a dividend from improvements in health and technology, for example, as we should have. But maybe it’s because I’m old and old people are hard-wired to feel this way ;)
Anyway, the book is okay, a bit repetitive at times but well written and with some nice dramatic examples of things going wrong. It was a work book club choice and I dare say I wouldn’t have picked it up otherwise, and it’s nice when that leads to something interesting and eye-opening.
On to number three, The Salt Path by Raynor Winn, because it’s been recommended a couple of times already on this thread.
Oh, does anyone else find that subsequent books always seem to have a connection? It’s obvious in this case since The Secret Barrister talks a lot about miscarriages of justice and changes to legal aid and The Salt Path starts with a miscarriage of justice exacerbated through not having access to legal aid, but other times the connections are not as straightforward, but they always seem to be there. I guess it’s just a human thing, to seek out connections and similarities...