I'm struggling to keep up with the thread, but I've just finished The Power of Now - Eckhart Tolle. I'll pop my reviews in this post for this and Norse Mythology. I'm just copying and pasting my Goodreads reviews, so if you have me on there, try not to "out" me (not that I'm hugely bothered.)
Norse Mythology: I'm a huge Gaiman fan, and have wanted to read this book since it was published (mainly because Thor and Loki are two of my favourite Marvel characters, and I wanted to know more about the history behind their stories).
This book didn't disappoint. The stories were lively and fun, and provided a well-rounded history of the Norse gods. As my only knowledge of Norse mythology came from Marvel and American Gods (so not particularly accurate), it surprised me to discover that Loki was Odin's blood brother rather than his adopted son, and it made the dynamic between Thor, Odin and Loki more interesting.
The only reason I couldn't give five stars was due to some errors in the text which should have been picked up in the editing process (for example, in the story of The Mead of Poets, Fjalar and Galar are written as Dark Elves on page 109 when they are first introduced, and are denoted as Dwarves for the remainder of the story). Story-wise, however, it's great and I'd highly recommend it.
The Power of Now: This book was okay, but not great. I listened to it on Audible, and the first thing I need to mention is that Eckhart Tolle speaks very slowly. I got used to this, but as I'm a quick reader I initially found it frustrating and needed to learn acceptance to get through it - it's possible this was deliberate as that is the main focus of Eckhart's teachings.
The good: the overarching message is one that a lot of people need to hear. Acceptance, being mentally present, and not dwelling on the past or future are important lessons to learn for a healthy mind, and roughly two thirds of the book explains this well.
The not so good: the interview style questions didn't work well in the audio book (which is surprising as you'd think it'd be better in this format than reading them). I think it's because the two people asking the questions seemed unnecessarily dull, and sounded like they were asking really stupid questions. I doubt they'd have seemed that way if you read the book in the traditional manner though, so that's why I haven't popped this down as a "bad" element.
The bad: Eckhart misses the mark in a number of his points, and (in my opinion) shouldn't have made them in the first place; the main section which riled me up was that of menstruation. Eckhart maintains that menstruation is "the collective female pain-body" and that women need to "catch it before it takes [them] over". He informs the reader that women know for certain when their period is going to come, and that it can become a "joyful and fulfilling expression of [their] womanhood".
Throughout this I basically wanted to tell him to f-off. I'm all for learning to accept that periods are pretty shit, and am almost okay with hearing that from a man, but for a man to tell us that they can be joyful? He needs to jog-on.