Please or to access all these features

Weight loss chat

A space to talk openly about weight loss journeys and challenges. Mumsnet hasn't checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. You may wish to speak to a medical professional before starting any diet.

Is being Obese an illness?

546 replies

agel · 18/10/2026 16:15

Yes or No
Im really not trying to start an argument. I want to understand what people actually think/know/believe about this.

I am obese and am trying to gain some sort of control over my eating through therapy at the moment. I’ve tried diets and exercising that do work but long term I don’t seem to be able to change my lifestyle enough to keep the weight off. I hate living like this and how people treat me differently because of my size. My family don’t understand at all. My partner is not understanding and it’s seriously affecting our relationship in many ways. It seems unfair because I don’t feel I have much control over this. It’s actually very lonely being in this situation. I rarely mention the topic of my health or weight to others because pardon the pun it’s always the elephant in the room! But you can almost hear what people are thinking. I hate the judgemental looks and comments. I rarely go out now because of anxiety and panic attacks brought on by this situation.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
WLIcurious · Yesterday 09:20

ExpectMore · 22/10/2026 21:59

Of course not. It’s a lack of self control and discipline resulting in too much &/or the wrong type of stuff going in and not enough energy being burnt off through movement etc.

There’s clearly medical conditions that could make it more likely, but it all comes down to the balancing of what goes in and what gets burnt off.

I actually think it’s damaging to individual and societal health that people seem to make excuses for it rather than just tackling it for what it is, recognising the harm it can cause.

I know that may seem harsh as it puts ownership at the individuals door but viewed differently, that’s where the power lies: it means people can do something about it if they wish.

Would you say the same about depression?

We all know we should be eating well, exercising, getting enough sleep, and talking with friends and family if we are feeling down and for most of us we can cope with life's ups and downs and yet some people get so depressed that they can't function.

To quote you 'There’s clearly medical conditions that could make it more likely, but it all comes down to the balancing of what goes in and what gets burnt off.'

So even people with disorders such as bipolar are suffering self-imposed misery because they're not touching enough grass and listening to upbeat music because of a lack of self-control and discipline and a lack of wish to do something about it?

ExpectMore · Yesterday 09:32

WLIcurious · Yesterday 09:20

Would you say the same about depression?

We all know we should be eating well, exercising, getting enough sleep, and talking with friends and family if we are feeling down and for most of us we can cope with life's ups and downs and yet some people get so depressed that they can't function.

To quote you 'There’s clearly medical conditions that could make it more likely, but it all comes down to the balancing of what goes in and what gets burnt off.'

So even people with disorders such as bipolar are suffering self-imposed misery because they're not touching enough grass and listening to upbeat music because of a lack of self-control and discipline and a lack of wish to do something about it?

It’s different. I thought that would have been obvious?

What is it about obesity being largely a self imposed condition that seemingly offends you?

Just look back even a few decades. People have ballooned in that time period however our basic biology hasn’t changed. That should tell you something.

I’ve struggled with weight throughout my lifetime myself but entirely hold my hands up and accept I’m at my fattest when not exercising and eating healthily whereas I’m leaner when actively eating healthily, not drinking, and exercising.

MargoLivebetter · Yesterday 09:43

@ExpectMore something can be self-imposed and also an illness. The two are not mutually exclusive! Surely that is obvious.

GiveMeWordGames · Yesterday 09:45

DeliaPith321 · Yesterday 08:51

I appreciate that the landscape will evolve, but I think there's a considerable difference between anticipating technological and pharmaceutical developments and predicting their economic and practical consequences.
Even if medication prices fall dramatically, that doesn't necessarily make population-wide treatment economically sustainable. We're potentially talking about millions of people requiring treatment for decades, rather than a short course of medication. A relatively inexpensive drug can still represent an enormous public expenditure when prescribed continuously at that scale.
There's also no guarantee that lower prices will translate into universal access. NHS funding decisions involve cost-effectiveness, competing healthcare priorities and the opportunity cost of allocating substantial resources to one intervention over others.
We also need to distinguish between reducing the prevalence of obesity and reducing the underlying drivers of obesity. These medications may be highly effective treatments, but they don't change the environmental and socioeconomic conditions contributing to the problem.
I certainly agree that the future may look very different. What I'm questioning is the assumption that pharmaceutical innovation and falling prices will inevitably translate into widespread access, sustainable long-term treatment and substantial net savings for the NHS. Those are outcomes that would need to be demonstrated, rather than assumed.

I get that the upfront/ongoing cost must appear phenomenal to NHS budget-holders but I do think there's a short-sightedness to this approach. I honestly don't know if anyone has sat down and worked out the vast cost of obesity-related illness to the NHS and other services and weighed that against the upfront outlay on WLI. I don't know if you could. There was a 24 Hours in A&E a while ago with a morbidly obese bloke who ended up there with awful sepsis in his leg. He ended up in ICU but survived. He was someone who had literally lost his job as a bus driver due to his weight, was badly controlled T2D (hence the leg infection) and being treated for depression because he was basically a shut-in - again due to weight. Add up all the costs incurred just in the one snap shot - not just immediate health related but benefits as well - and in a relatively short period of time, then multiply that across the population. I'm not sure withholding WLIs IS cost-effective. (This programme's filming pre-dated WLIs by a year or two - there's a slim chance he might qualify under the ridiculously tight NHS rules now but pretty unlikely).

It's like hearing aids. My DH recently got them. He explored private and NHS options. He ended up going private because - as well as a months-long waiting time - the NHS wouldn't cover rechargeable ones, only battery powered "but we will continually supply the batteries you need for them" . WHAT? How, in the long term, is that cost-effective? The price difference versus however many years of batteries. It seems mad to me.

Ffiohna · Yesterday 09:56

GiveMeWordGames · Yesterday 09:45

I get that the upfront/ongoing cost must appear phenomenal to NHS budget-holders but I do think there's a short-sightedness to this approach. I honestly don't know if anyone has sat down and worked out the vast cost of obesity-related illness to the NHS and other services and weighed that against the upfront outlay on WLI. I don't know if you could. There was a 24 Hours in A&E a while ago with a morbidly obese bloke who ended up there with awful sepsis in his leg. He ended up in ICU but survived. He was someone who had literally lost his job as a bus driver due to his weight, was badly controlled T2D (hence the leg infection) and being treated for depression because he was basically a shut-in - again due to weight. Add up all the costs incurred just in the one snap shot - not just immediate health related but benefits as well - and in a relatively short period of time, then multiply that across the population. I'm not sure withholding WLIs IS cost-effective. (This programme's filming pre-dated WLIs by a year or two - there's a slim chance he might qualify under the ridiculously tight NHS rules now but pretty unlikely).

It's like hearing aids. My DH recently got them. He explored private and NHS options. He ended up going private because - as well as a months-long waiting time - the NHS wouldn't cover rechargeable ones, only battery powered "but we will continually supply the batteries you need for them" . WHAT? How, in the long term, is that cost-effective? The price difference versus however many years of batteries. It seems mad to me.

That’s interesting re hearing aids - reducing waste in the nhs is apparently an aim. this would seem a win win win - reduce cost of batteries, reduce waste through resource efficiency, improve quality (the public users being the customers). With their enormous buying power it ought to be possible to contract for recharging aids. Another them and us situation and shortsightedness. I am prescribed hearing aids but haven’t been able to wear them - it’s chalk and cheese to wearing specs before anyone says it!

ExpectMore · Yesterday 09:57

MargoLivebetter · Yesterday 09:43

@ExpectMore something can be self-imposed and also an illness. The two are not mutually exclusive! Surely that is obvious.

It’s not an illness, that much is obvious. It is a disease, per the definition of disease. Self imposed in this case.

In your haste you’ve forgotten the basic facts.

DeliaPith321 · Yesterday 10:00

SilenceInside · Yesterday 09:11

@DeliaPith321 of course, it’s an interesting topic to debate. But for a lot of us discussing it, what is said is also about our own personal situation and decisions. We are part of the group that’s being discussed. Sometimes that generates emotions, we are (presumably) all human.

I'm not negating that but informing me about those emotional reactions or perceptions isn't appropriate. It's not really my problem.

Ffiohna · Yesterday 10:01

WLIcurious · Yesterday 09:20

Would you say the same about depression?

We all know we should be eating well, exercising, getting enough sleep, and talking with friends and family if we are feeling down and for most of us we can cope with life's ups and downs and yet some people get so depressed that they can't function.

To quote you 'There’s clearly medical conditions that could make it more likely, but it all comes down to the balancing of what goes in and what gets burnt off.'

So even people with disorders such as bipolar are suffering self-imposed misery because they're not touching enough grass and listening to upbeat music because of a lack of self-control and discipline and a lack of wish to do something about it?

You’re right. We all know the “just snap out of it” “just pull your socks up” “ just keep reminding yourself how much you have to be grateful for” bla bla bla. Exactly comparable to “just eat less” “just move more” “just take responsibility” “just control yourself”. Just just just.

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:05

GiveMeWordGames · Yesterday 09:45

I get that the upfront/ongoing cost must appear phenomenal to NHS budget-holders but I do think there's a short-sightedness to this approach. I honestly don't know if anyone has sat down and worked out the vast cost of obesity-related illness to the NHS and other services and weighed that against the upfront outlay on WLI. I don't know if you could. There was a 24 Hours in A&E a while ago with a morbidly obese bloke who ended up there with awful sepsis in his leg. He ended up in ICU but survived. He was someone who had literally lost his job as a bus driver due to his weight, was badly controlled T2D (hence the leg infection) and being treated for depression because he was basically a shut-in - again due to weight. Add up all the costs incurred just in the one snap shot - not just immediate health related but benefits as well - and in a relatively short period of time, then multiply that across the population. I'm not sure withholding WLIs IS cost-effective. (This programme's filming pre-dated WLIs by a year or two - there's a slim chance he might qualify under the ridiculously tight NHS rules now but pretty unlikely).

It's like hearing aids. My DH recently got them. He explored private and NHS options. He ended up going private because - as well as a months-long waiting time - the NHS wouldn't cover rechargeable ones, only battery powered "but we will continually supply the batteries you need for them" . WHAT? How, in the long term, is that cost-effective? The price difference versus however many years of batteries. It seems mad to me.

It’d be cheaper if people took accountability for their own health and well being and didn’t rely on drugs full stop. They were around years ago when obesity levels were much less. I get that sometimes people need some short-term help but the current levels of demand and use are excessive: it’s another symptom of the trend for instant fixes or rewards rather than the simple basic tried and tested boring approach.

It’s frightening when you look around and see how many folk are obese when you consider the damage they’re doing to themselves and the costs to the tax payer.

MargoLivebetter · Yesterday 10:07

ExpectMore · Yesterday 09:57

It’s not an illness, that much is obvious. It is a disease, per the definition of disease. Self imposed in this case.

In your haste you’ve forgotten the basic facts.

I was using the term that the OP used to start the thread.

I would argue that obesity can be both an illness and a disease. Perhaps in your haste it is you who have forgotten the facts?!

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:09

Ffiohna · Yesterday 10:01

You’re right. We all know the “just snap out of it” “just pull your socks up” “ just keep reminding yourself how much you have to be grateful for” bla bla bla. Exactly comparable to “just eat less” “just move more” “just take responsibility” “just control yourself”. Just just just.

Don’t fall into the trap previous poster did of conflating 3 x conditions, supposedly in an attempt to mask the fact that accountability goes a large part to addressing obesity issues.

For some reason, PP seems offended by this despite it being the recognised state of affairs by the medical profession.

I mean, a simple google and review of even the NHS website makes this clear.

Quote:

Causes of overweight and obesityYou put on weight when you your body turns extra calories from food and drink into fat.
This is often caused by:

  • not doing enough physical activity to use up calories from food and drink
  • eating and drinking more than your body needs, especially food and drinks that are high in fat and sugar

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/overweight-and-obesity/

nhs.uk

Overweight and obesity in adults

NHS information about living with overweight and obesity, including the risks of being overweight, how to lose weight and available treatment.

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/overweight-and-obesity/

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:12

MargoLivebetter · Yesterday 10:07

I was using the term that the OP used to start the thread.

I would argue that obesity can be both an illness and a disease. Perhaps in your haste it is you who have forgotten the facts?!

I understand she used that term, hence I answered no.

You can argue all what you want, and I’ll politely choose to disagree.

In any event, all the debates around whether it’s a disease and / or illness and / or something else are frivolous. Facts of the matter are that it’s largely self imposed and that people can do something about it if they both choose to and apply themselves.

MargoLivebetter · Yesterday 10:13

@ExpectMore I don't think there is a single person in the world who doesn't understand that the accumulation of fat on a person's body is caused by an excess consumption of calories.

What causes the person to over consume the calories is the far more interesting question. Although clearly not to you!

Ffiohna · Yesterday 10:13

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:09

Don’t fall into the trap previous poster did of conflating 3 x conditions, supposedly in an attempt to mask the fact that accountability goes a large part to addressing obesity issues.

For some reason, PP seems offended by this despite it being the recognised state of affairs by the medical profession.

I mean, a simple google and review of even the NHS website makes this clear.

Quote:

Causes of overweight and obesityYou put on weight when you your body turns extra calories from food and drink into fat.
This is often caused by:

  • not doing enough physical activity to use up calories from food and drink
  • eating and drinking more than your body needs, especially food and drinks that are high in fat and sugar

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/overweight-and-obesity/

Honestly, I don’t need your lecture, perhaps you don’t appreciate it but guess what, I already know.

If you can be arsed to RTFT you might see there’s been varied and mostly thoughtful - and often very personal - conversation. Way beyond the eat less move more take responsibility parroting.

GiveMeWordGames · Yesterday 10:14

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:05

It’d be cheaper if people took accountability for their own health and well being and didn’t rely on drugs full stop. They were around years ago when obesity levels were much less. I get that sometimes people need some short-term help but the current levels of demand and use are excessive: it’s another symptom of the trend for instant fixes or rewards rather than the simple basic tried and tested boring approach.

It’s frightening when you look around and see how many folk are obese when you consider the damage they’re doing to themselves and the costs to the tax payer.

Oh, give it a rest with your judgemental over-simplification of a complex issue.

You clearly believe people who are obese just sit about never trying, never desperately working their way through every weight loss programme, fad diet, latest exercise craze. And nobody's going to convince you otherwise. So I'm not wasting my time trying.

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:18

MargoLivebetter · Yesterday 10:13

@ExpectMore I don't think there is a single person in the world who doesn't understand that the accumulation of fat on a person's body is caused by an excess consumption of calories.

What causes the person to over consume the calories is the far more interesting question. Although clearly not to you!

Edited

It’s interesting in so far as you quickly get to the answer: “lack of self control” (for those who are aware of what a healthy diet looks like) or “lack of education” (for those who are unaware of what a healthy diet looks like).

In the uk, given the prevalence of education re. healthy eaten, it’s the former.

Some folk like to pontificate when it achieves nothing. Best just taking action when the answer is obvious.

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:22

GiveMeWordGames · Yesterday 10:14

Oh, give it a rest with your judgemental over-simplification of a complex issue.

You clearly believe people who are obese just sit about never trying, never desperately working their way through every weight loss programme, fad diet, latest exercise craze. And nobody's going to convince you otherwise. So I'm not wasting my time trying.

That’s the issue. Everyone looking for the latest quick fire solution or craze when the answer is basic, boring, and right in front of us all: eat a healthy diet and stay active (either through general lifestyle or exercise to augment a sedentary lifestyle).

Not judging anyone btw. Just stating fact. As I noted previously, I’ve struggled with my weight and it’s obvious what’s caused me to put it on when I have and lose it when I have.

Ffiohna · Yesterday 10:23

Charlenedickens · Yesterday 08:32

I take my hat off to you, I think it’s a sign of a good person to own up to jealousy, many do not,

and it’s not just with these meds, many people when they get jealous don’t own up to it, in fact they do the opposite, they attack and rip apart the thing they wish and the people who have it,

it could be anything from a successful career, to a nice house , to fab holidays, or a great car. Which is utterly pointless as everyone can see its envy, but their go to, is to attack and belittle to make themselves feel better,

Thanks for saying that, I don’t think I’m particularly good but I try to be fair and honest. I actually got some help from a coach a while back about what I hated in myself feeling jealous. I’m never jealous of items - houses, cars, etc- but the cacophony re ease on WLIs was too much. Anyway I found a way and I am genuinely- genuinely- pleased for those whose lives have been transformed. I feel the more we hear this the more chance the rest of us might have at some point, as pressure and persistence can deliver results.

MargoLivebetter · Yesterday 10:24

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:18

It’s interesting in so far as you quickly get to the answer: “lack of self control” (for those who are aware of what a healthy diet looks like) or “lack of education” (for those who are unaware of what a healthy diet looks like).

In the uk, given the prevalence of education re. healthy eaten, it’s the former.

Some folk like to pontificate when it achieves nothing. Best just taking action when the answer is obvious.

Oh the irony of your observation about some folks liking to pontificate!

Meadowfinch · Yesterday 10:42

Aluna · 20/10/2026 09:56

I see it as an eating disorder and addiction.

Some obese people want it to be a physical disease but it’s not. It does have serious physical consequences though.

I'm not sure it is even an addiction. The majority of people aren't taught nutrition, they arent taught to cook, they eat what is presented to them as easy and readily available, and that means (in most cases) highly processed poor quality food, with far too much sugar, insufficient fibre and often with synthetic ingredients.

I let my spare room a few years ago to a single man about 40yo. I cooked for myself from scratch so I made him breakfast & evening meals at the same time.

He was obese when he moved in, stayed two years and slowly lost weight without trying. The meals I made had lots of veg, meat/fish, eggs or cheese, wholemeal carbs, no sugar. Healthy gut biome is important, requiring a wide variety of fruit and veg for good digestion.

Eating healthily is not difficult but requires basic knowledge that too few people are taught. It's so silly.

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:50

Meadowfinch · Yesterday 10:42

I'm not sure it is even an addiction. The majority of people aren't taught nutrition, they arent taught to cook, they eat what is presented to them as easy and readily available, and that means (in most cases) highly processed poor quality food, with far too much sugar, insufficient fibre and often with synthetic ingredients.

I let my spare room a few years ago to a single man about 40yo. I cooked for myself from scratch so I made him breakfast & evening meals at the same time.

He was obese when he moved in, stayed two years and slowly lost weight without trying. The meals I made had lots of veg, meat/fish, eggs or cheese, wholemeal carbs, no sugar. Healthy gut biome is important, requiring a wide variety of fruit and veg for good digestion.

Eating healthily is not difficult but requires basic knowledge that too few people are taught. It's so silly.

Edited

I largely agree but isn’t this taught in schools? It was back in the day when I attended and I’m sure they wouldn’t have removed it from the curriculum since then given the prevalence of healthy eating programmes that we’ve had.

Charlenedickens · Yesterday 10:53

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:05

It’d be cheaper if people took accountability for their own health and well being and didn’t rely on drugs full stop. They were around years ago when obesity levels were much less. I get that sometimes people need some short-term help but the current levels of demand and use are excessive: it’s another symptom of the trend for instant fixes or rewards rather than the simple basic tried and tested boring approach.

It’s frightening when you look around and see how many folk are obese when you consider the damage they’re doing to themselves and the costs to the tax payer.

ah thank god you’re here to tell fat people why they are fat, and how in your opinion the weight loss injections usage is excessive and it’s really people need to take accountability and stop being lazy and greedy,

honestly, come off mumsnet, write to the who and all the global health authorities, they need to know you’re genius level insights.

then come back and tell us how that went for you.

ps, sorry to hear you can’t afford the meds

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:54

DeliaPith321 · Yesterday 09:03

Just to clarify, I'm here because I genuinely enjoy debate, exchanging perspectives and exploring different arguments. I'm really enjoying the discussion and welcome disagreement, challenges and alternative viewpoints.
I'm not interested in interpersonal disputes or managing other people's emotional responses to differences of opinion. If anyone is interpreting an emotional tone in my contributions, that may reflect their own perceptions or simply my enthusiasm for the subject.
I'm engaging with the ideas being presented, not making personal judgements about the people presenting them. I don't consider disagreement to be conflict, and I'd much rather keep the conversation focused on the subject matter than on perceived intentions or emotions.
For me, a lively, intellectually stimulating discussion is something to enjoy, not something to take personally.

Your view is refreshing! I’m fed with how many folk on here take disagreement to be “judgement” and / or a personal attack. We seem to be losing the ability to debate objectively as a country (and at our peril!).

ExpectMore · Yesterday 10:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Charlenedickens · Yesterday 10:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Sure,

Swipe left for the next trending thread