Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Weight loss injections/treatments

Discuss weight-loss injections and treatments, including personal experiences. Mumsnet hasn't checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. You may wish to speak to a medical professional before starting any treatments.

Do you agree there should be more checks before drugs are prescribed.?

143 replies

RedHillLady · 27/01/2025 19:04

There has been a lot in the media recently about how the current system is too weak and needs to be more robust.
I think we are going to see increased regulation soon and I see that as a good thing.

OP posts:
Finallydoingit24 · 29/01/2025 16:54

B2B25 · 29/01/2025 16:31

@Finallydoingit24 So it's ok to call people with ED reckless but not people eating themselves to an early grave? I'd say that's pretty reckless tbf.

Their behaviour is reckless if they take medication that is dangerous for them and which makes their condition worse. Everyone on here says we need to work to stop people in this position from obtaining the drugs and from using them. Nobody thinks these people should be able to take the medication. There are loads of MH conditions where sufferers display reckless behaviour - eg BPD.

I suspect that in your head, comparing it to overeating makes sense but it doesn’t. These are obese people who are taking the medication to reduce their weight and improve their health. Nothing reckless about them taking the medication at all. I know you want to stick the boot in and call people reckless and greedy for getting into that position in the first place (not sure why) but you might want to read up on causes of obesity and physiological responses.

HottWaterBottle · 29/01/2025 16:59

Finallydoingit24 · 29/01/2025 16:54

Their behaviour is reckless if they take medication that is dangerous for them and which makes their condition worse. Everyone on here says we need to work to stop people in this position from obtaining the drugs and from using them. Nobody thinks these people should be able to take the medication. There are loads of MH conditions where sufferers display reckless behaviour - eg BPD.

I suspect that in your head, comparing it to overeating makes sense but it doesn’t. These are obese people who are taking the medication to reduce their weight and improve their health. Nothing reckless about them taking the medication at all. I know you want to stick the boot in and call people reckless and greedy for getting into that position in the first place (not sure why) but you might want to read up on causes of obesity and physiological responses.

The causes of obesity are not reckless behaviour. The causes of eating disorders are not reckless behaviour. The point being made is it is unfair to call someone with an eating disorder reckless and stupid just as it would be unfair to call an obese person eating burgers and chips, reckless and stupid. There are psychological and physiological reasons for both people's actions.

The cure for the obese person (GLP1) may be a death sentence for the eating disordered person. Just like the cure for the eating disordered person (to eat a lot of high calorie food to get their weight up) could be a death sentence for an obese person.

It is possible to have sympathy for both and realise neither are reckless nor stupid because of what their bodies and minds are forcing them to do ....

ThatCoralShark · 29/01/2025 17:23

AnnaQuayInTheUk · 29/01/2025 14:51

@Searchingforthelight maybe GP was not exactly what I meant. I just think there needs to be far more regulation of the market and the NHS needs to step up or intervene to try to prevent abuse of the system. I've got a colleague who was a size 12 and now is a size 8 thanks to Ozempic (or maybe MJ, can't remember), she certainly shouldn't have qualified. But she gamed the system. She couldn't have done that if her initial consultation had been face to face

So millions of people should go without in your view.,as they can’t afford the inflated costs, or can’t get a consultation due to the multiple year waiting lists, they should struggle on. With their health conditions caused by obesity. Due to a small minority of folks like your mate.

sure. That’s logical.

Finallydoingit24 · 29/01/2025 17:33

HottWaterBottle · 29/01/2025 16:59

The causes of obesity are not reckless behaviour. The causes of eating disorders are not reckless behaviour. The point being made is it is unfair to call someone with an eating disorder reckless and stupid just as it would be unfair to call an obese person eating burgers and chips, reckless and stupid. There are psychological and physiological reasons for both people's actions.

The cure for the obese person (GLP1) may be a death sentence for the eating disordered person. Just like the cure for the eating disordered person (to eat a lot of high calorie food to get their weight up) could be a death sentence for an obese person.

It is possible to have sympathy for both and realise neither are reckless nor stupid because of what their bodies and minds are forcing them to do ....

Edited

They aren’t reckless for having or developing an eating disorder. Their behaviour, caused by their disorder, in taking drugs that are dangerous for them is reckless. The same as an obese person who takes double doses of WLIs or obtains it cut price on the black market. Not sure why this is controversial.

HottWaterBottle · 29/01/2025 17:41

Finallydoingit24 · 29/01/2025 17:33

They aren’t reckless for having or developing an eating disorder. Their behaviour, caused by their disorder, in taking drugs that are dangerous for them is reckless. The same as an obese person who takes double doses of WLIs or obtains it cut price on the black market. Not sure why this is controversial.

It's not reckless behaviour, it's behaviour driven by faulty physiology and psychology. Just like when an obese person chooses to eat Macdonald's. If you are calling both behaviours reckless and stupid, that makes sense (though I don't agree)

ThatCoralShark · 29/01/2025 17:43

HottWaterBottle · 29/01/2025 17:41

It's not reckless behaviour, it's behaviour driven by faulty physiology and psychology. Just like when an obese person chooses to eat Macdonald's. If you are calling both behaviours reckless and stupid, that makes sense (though I don't agree)

Read some of the threads on here, folks messing with their doses, lying about their bmis, starving themselves.

sometimes people are reckless or stupid, they are not all mentally unwell or have some fault on their psychology.

FCforMounjaro · 29/01/2025 17:46

IrisPallida · 29/01/2025 12:09

What about:

Pharmacy prescribes, GP surgery is notified immediately and as a matter of course, has responsibility to review (either GP or GP's in-house pharmacist or even practice nurse/admin) and notify prescribing pharmacy if there is any reason medication should not be issued. This way GPs time is not tied up in the prescription process for a medication that does not need it in the vast, vast majority of cases, but checks are in place.

Incidentally, I believe this is the process that will be put in place at some point in the next year. More and more prescribing pharmacies are doing this anyway, including ones that used to give the option of not notifying GP. Anecdotally from posts on Reddit, even pharmacies that say they won't notify in fact are now doing so.

Pharmacies are doing this to protect themselves, not patients. It is a commercial decision not a moral/ethical one, so you can be sure that they WILL all be doing this. They cannot afford losing their license/bad publicity for not demonstrating due diligence in keeping to the prescribing guidelines.

Every single post on here where an OP is asking for a pharmacy that does not notify GP for whatever reason ('my relative works for GP and I don't want them to know' blah blah) will be someone attempting to bilk the prescription parameters.

I meet the criteria, no history of ED, but also was wary of informing GP. Not everyone has a sympathetic GP or ability to move.

ThatCoralShark · 29/01/2025 17:49

FCforMounjaro · 29/01/2025 17:46

I meet the criteria, no history of ED, but also was wary of informing GP. Not everyone has a sympathetic GP or ability to move.

But your gp can’t stop the prescribing if you are eligible, genuinely eligible.

FCforMounjaro · 29/01/2025 17:58

ThatCoralShark · 29/01/2025 17:49

But your gp can’t stop the prescribing if you are eligible, genuinely eligible.

It has been prescribed and I am genuinely eligible.

It feels like some folks are annoyed that there’s a medication available to help millions of people which the nhs doesn’t have to pay for but will benefit from.

Frequency · 29/01/2025 18:10

I'm not against people who need it getting it, I don't think anyone is. I am wholly against it being marketed at all, let alone so aggressively, and I am against how easy it is for people to obtain.

There needs to be a balance so that those who need it can have it and those who would abuse it cannot get it via a couple of clicks with a mouse.

I don't see how or why an in-person appointment, whether via a prescribing nurse or pharmacist or a GP, would make it impossible or harder for those who need it to get it.

The cult-like defensiveness around it and anyone who dares question its safety is also odd. It is, after all, a prescription medication that has potential side effects such as thyroid cancer, pancreatitis, kidney failure...

Also, can you imagine the uproar if other types of prescription drugs which are relatively safe when used properly but highly susceptible to abuse were advertised in the same way?

"Sick of having a headache and being told to use paracetamol and turn the screen off? It doesn't work! Join Heroin.org now and try Oramorph. It will change your life! See Instagram for your discount code."

Searchingforthelight · 29/01/2025 18:14

Frequency · 29/01/2025 18:10

I'm not against people who need it getting it, I don't think anyone is. I am wholly against it being marketed at all, let alone so aggressively, and I am against how easy it is for people to obtain.

There needs to be a balance so that those who need it can have it and those who would abuse it cannot get it via a couple of clicks with a mouse.

I don't see how or why an in-person appointment, whether via a prescribing nurse or pharmacist or a GP, would make it impossible or harder for those who need it to get it.

The cult-like defensiveness around it and anyone who dares question its safety is also odd. It is, after all, a prescription medication that has potential side effects such as thyroid cancer, pancreatitis, kidney failure...

Also, can you imagine the uproar if other types of prescription drugs which are relatively safe when used properly but highly susceptible to abuse were advertised in the same way?

"Sick of having a headache and being told to use paracetamol and turn the screen off? It doesn't work! Join Heroin.org now and try Oramorph. It will change your life! See Instagram for your discount code."

Edited

Silly comparison

People are seemingly defensive because they finally have a cure for obesity and people like you are ( for whatever reasons you may have) annoyed by this fact and wish to restrict their access to treatment for their condition.

Don't bother with your faux concern re side effects

You likely don't get your knickers in a twist about all other medication side effects

We've all heard this nonsense before

Finallydoingit24 · 29/01/2025 18:17

There are ads for most over the counter medication, some of which can be very dangerous if used improperly. I think I’ve seen adverts for the morning after pill too. Advertising medication is nothing new. Oramorph is a habit forming drug and is not available to buy in an unrestricted way. There is no suggestion that WLIs are addictive. Therefore the comparison isn’t the best.

Searchingforthelight · 29/01/2025 18:18

ThatCoralShark · 29/01/2025 17:23

So millions of people should go without in your view.,as they can’t afford the inflated costs, or can’t get a consultation due to the multiple year waiting lists, they should struggle on. With their health conditions caused by obesity. Due to a small minority of folks like your mate.

sure. That’s logical.

I agree with this
@AnnaQuayInTheUk Who cares if someone went from a size 12 to an 8

They're presumably still healthy

This isn't the(faux) concern raised regarding ED patients getting it

Why are you bovvered?!

B2B25 · 29/01/2025 18:34

Not at all @Finallydoingit24 I've been morbidly obese myself.

ThatCoralShark · 29/01/2025 18:37

FCforMounjaro · 29/01/2025 17:58

It has been prescribed and I am genuinely eligible.

It feels like some folks are annoyed that there’s a medication available to help millions of people which the nhs doesn’t have to pay for but will benefit from.

Not me, I’m on it. However I do not agree to withhold the information from gp;s I don’t see the reason. They don’t need to be emotionally supportive. If you’re eligible you’re eligible. There is no reason your gp shouldn’t know and it shouldn’t be on your medical records you’re on this drug.

I’ve still not seen one time anyone can explain a good reason why they don’t want the drug on their medical records.

FCforMounjaro · 29/01/2025 18:40

People don’t need to explain that to you. Why is it any of your concern ?

ThatCoralShark · 29/01/2025 18:43

FCforMounjaro · 29/01/2025 18:40

People don’t need to explain that to you. Why is it any of your concern ?

Who are you refering to?

you do understand this is a chat forum right? Coming on and trying to silence discussion is odd.

AnnaQuayInTheUk · 30/01/2025 10:33

@Searchingforthelight I'm concerned because there's already huge pressure on young women to conform to certain standards about weight and size. I think women lying about their weight to gain access to strong medication which will lower their weight when they have no need of it is dangerous.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread