Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Weddings

Chat to other Mumsnetters on our Wedding forum.

No kids allowed but close family kids are

70 replies

JulyDreams · 25/06/2022 13:29

Wedding invite states no kids allowed to decor close family kids. Would you still attend if you had to leave your newborn of 4 months at home?

Thanks

OP posts:
WhatNoRaisins · 25/06/2022 13:55

Probably says more about me than anything else but knowing no one there apart from the couple is another factor that would make me want to decline 😳. I'm not an MN rabid wedding hater honest.

Jalepenojello · 25/06/2022 13:56

I’d go. I don’t care much if my children are invited or not or if anyone else’s are there.

JulyDreams · 25/06/2022 13:59

WhatNoRaisins · 25/06/2022 13:55

Probably says more about me than anything else but knowing no one there apart from the couple is another factor that would make me want to decline 😳. I'm not an MN rabid wedding hater honest.

I know what you mean.

OP posts:
MultiBird · 25/06/2022 14:00

Do they're really mean no newborns?

I understand restricting the number of children (although persoanally I think children are often the best bit of a wedding) but a baby is no cost or inconvenience to anyone.

I'd check if baby really not allowed to come, but no I wouldn't go unless it was very local and I could leave him/her with a close family member.

Although I'm not sure 4 months is new born? I'm old so my DC were born in a time when 6 months' ML was generous. By 4 months I was leaving them for full days in preparation for going back to work.

JulyDreams · 25/06/2022 14:01

Jalepenojello · 25/06/2022 13:56

I’d go. I don’t care much if my children are invited or not or if anyone else’s are there.

If we could take our daughter I'd RSVP tomorrow with yes we would love to.

But equally they are in their right to not want children there so I understand. But I'm also saying to myself- well she won't be running around causing havoc?? She would be with me and DP. I don't know if they would even have to pay for her as she wouldn't even be in a seat at the table or needing food? At most I think they just wouldn't want her crying at the ceremony...

OP posts:
Scottishskifun · 25/06/2022 14:02

Usually "babes in arms" so less then a year or 6 months depending on the couple are excluded from the no children rule. Would double check with the couple first.
If they include such a young baby then nope I wouldn't go

KerryO87x · 25/06/2022 14:04

I've got my close friends wedding in 5 weeks.
I've just had a baby 2 weeks ago and I'm leaving him with my mum & dad as well as my older daughter.
The difference I think is I want to go and it's my 2nd baby.
You'd have to weigh up all the different factors and maybe see closer to the time.

SexyBastardSmile · 25/06/2022 14:07

No, it’s too much hassle for a wedding.

JenniferBarkley · 25/06/2022 14:07

No children outside of close family has probably been the case at every wedding I've been to, it's very normal and not something that would bother me at all.

At 4 months both of mine were breastfed and didn't take a bottle, and I wasn't ready to leave them either so I would've happily declined. If they were DH's friends and he knew other people going he probably would've gone.

StampOnTheGround · 25/06/2022 14:11

We're going to a wedding when our baby is 4 months, staying with my mum and out a similar length of time to you - but it's 1 hour 30 one way

girlmom21 · 25/06/2022 14:11

Not close friends really. Don't reach out to us, go over to see them once or once every 2 years and they are local... a little unsure why we have been given the invite really.

In this instance, I wouldn't go.

We left our 10 week old overnight for our close friends 'child free' wedding. We were pretty frustrated when we found it wasn't child-free after all as baby was our PFB.

Pippinbird · 25/06/2022 14:12

JulyDreams · 25/06/2022 13:51

DP is more close with them than me. I am leaning towards not going. Perhaps we could go to the evening instead?

Then let him go on his own and you decline because of 4 month baby.

There’s no dilemma to be he here

Pippinbird · 25/06/2022 14:13
  • had here
HarvestFly · 25/06/2022 14:18

At most I think they just wouldn't want her crying at the ceremony...

It's not just crying OP. Babies and toddlers are unpredictable. I was at a wedding where groom's sister had brought her young baby. She was holding her and baby threw up over her lovely wedding outfit Shock
There was shuffling about in pews during the service so she could get out.

Pbbananabagel · 25/06/2022 14:25

Just check in with them as a babe in arms is usually the exception to a no kids rule in my experience

HelloNorthernStar · 25/06/2022 14:26

Invite does says no kids, not sure why you think you would be an exception. Bit of a situation to put the groom in when others will have been told the same and like you say, you don’t see them. Just don’t go!

Marmite27 · 25/06/2022 14:28

I wouldn’t go. We had this situation, DC2 was a 5 week preemie, exclusively breast fed baby who wouldn’t take a bottle.

The friendship has never recovered tbh.

BobbinHood · 25/06/2022 14:32

At 4 months I was fine leaving my DD with her dad for the day and would for a close friend’s wedding. For something far away, that required an overnight, or someone I wasn’t close to, I wouldn’t bother.

fallfallfall · 25/06/2022 14:32

If your close enough just go to the service ( you alone, child with partner). Max 2 hr if an orthodox one.

JulyDreams · 25/06/2022 14:33

Marmite27 · 25/06/2022 14:28

I wouldn’t go. We had this situation, DC2 was a 5 week preemie, exclusively breast fed baby who wouldn’t take a bottle.

The friendship has never recovered tbh.

Really, why did they not understand with a premature baby?

OP posts:
Snog · 25/06/2022 14:40

If you don't want to go then don't! Baby is a perfect excuse.

WomanStanleyWoman2 · 25/06/2022 14:45

It’s irrelevant that close family kids are going

Exactly. I can’t understand why you’d include this information - unless it’s the beginning of a ‘But it’s not like there won’t be any children there, so why can’t my precious baby be an exception too?’ argument.

WomanStanleyWoman2 · 25/06/2022 14:45

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

WomanStanleyWoman2 · 25/06/2022 14:46

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Quoted wrong post, sorry.

WomanStanleyWoman2 · 25/06/2022 14:47

Marmite27 · 25/06/2022 14:28

I wouldn’t go. We had this situation, DC2 was a 5 week preemie, exclusively breast fed baby who wouldn’t take a bottle.

The friendship has never recovered tbh.

Why?

Swipe left for the next trending thread