Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Weaning

Find weaning advice from other Mumsnetters on our Weaning forum. Use our child development calendar for more information.

i know i shouldn't really link to another site ....

126 replies

nappyaddict · 22/09/2008 11:31

but this has made me feel a bit

OP posts:
spinspinsugar · 22/09/2008 11:38

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MarlaSinger · 22/09/2008 11:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

stretchmarkqueen · 22/09/2008 15:10

Can't be real? It's like some sort of competition.
"i put my dd on baby rice when she was about 6 weeks old cuz she was getting so fed up of milk (dont tell my hv lol)" WTF??

will join you there.

DeJaVous · 22/09/2008 15:16

Unbelievable! Poor little sausages.

Indith · 22/09/2008 15:30

I can understand why the ones struggling with a growth spurt and feeding every 15 mins are tempted, really I can but why is it a problem if your baby only takes 4oz every 2 hours? If they don't want more why does that make you think "oh he's hungry give him rice"?

Bucharest · 22/09/2008 15:35

They all do it on BC. (start shovelling biscuits in at 8wks)

nappyaddict · 22/09/2008 16:07

i really wanted to say something but thought i'd better not!

OP posts:
JordTyler · 27/09/2008 22:08

They must all be bonkers, or v. silly. Have got stronger words but wouldn't like to offend!

AnarchyAunt · 27/09/2008 22:12

Oh dear.

All too typical attitude though.

Woman I know had prem baby at 32 weeks, gave her evaporated milk and baby rice in bottle at four weeks old, and started on jars of crap food at eight weeks. Apparently it was fine as she was 'advanced'.

MamaHobgoblin · 28/09/2008 16:33

I'm most aghast at the doctor who said ok to baby rice and pureed veg and fruit at 3 and a bit months because the baby 'was an early developer'. Gah.
I know we shouldn't slam other sites, but this one is consistently annoying. My SIL swore by it and she's a GP, though...

Ewe · 28/09/2008 16:42

Farking hell, that is disgraceful. Shouldn't websites have a care of duty to keep an eye on things like that? Or at least have a moderator who can post the correct advice. Jeez.

RedOnHerHead · 28/09/2008 16:51

DS2 is now 21wks and still going strong on the boob!

makes me really annoyed when i hear babies only a few weeks old have been given solids!

AnarchyAunt · 28/09/2008 17:01

If you dare to say anything on the site in question (and others I have visited) on this subject you get shouted down.

'Cos s/he is soooo advanced, and a big/small baby, and wanted feeding, ooooh, every three hours, and happy mum = happy baby, and they are doing what is best for their babies, and you are not living in the real world, and s/he needed more than milk, and their mum/gran/SIL/window cleaner said so, as did the HV (), and don't worry about the BF mafia, and s/he loves it and can't get enough, and it never did [insert irrelevant anecdotal person here] any harm.

RedOnHerHead · 28/09/2008 17:17

My DC's weren't small babies - DS1 and 2 both born 8lb 6oz - DS1 gained weight really fast on the boob and didn't need anything else - I was however told by my HV that he was gaining too much weight for a BF baby and that i should start him on solids at 16wks. I tried him on the dreaded baby rice but he CLEARLY wasn't ready, so i put it off til he was 6mths. Now on DS2 (who is only 21wks tomorrow) I was asked by HV how weaning is going and how many bottles he is on - "we're bfing til the recommended SIX months".

He sleeps from 10pm til 10am with no night feeds, so he doesn't need it! At six months we are going to try BLW - avoiding baby rice - especially after what i just read in that thread about arsenic!

pudding25 · 28/09/2008 22:46

WTF is wrong with these people?

pudding25 · 28/09/2008 22:49

I am a member of bounty and just posted a reply asking why on earth they were weaning so early...

weebump · 28/09/2008 23:38

Yikes. If that annoyed you, you should see the talk on this site. It's Irish based. Here the advice is 4-6 months if you're formula feeding, 6 months if you're breast feeding. But 6 weeks is a bit mad!

AnarchyAunt · 29/09/2008 08:10

pudding - just like I said....

VictorianSqualor · 29/09/2008 09:21

I've commented but I know all they'll do is ignore me.

pudding25 · 29/09/2008 09:30

I will check later to see if anyone has replied - I intend on having an argument

pudding25 · 29/09/2008 09:36

weebump I like your reply on the Irish site. Do you think anyone will listen???

SoupDragon · 29/09/2008 09:36

Those posters are really not very bright.

shoedweller · 29/09/2008 09:54

If mums are not coping with breastfeeding then the advice that is given is not always helpful. yes it's normal and yes lots of very admirable women do it and it does get better. However if a woman feels unable to cope with a baby who is that hungry she may feel that solids are the only option. If she was given proper advice she would be able to top of with formula have a full child with longer gaps between feeds and put weaning off until 6 months. People are too frightened to mention mixed feeding.

MrsJamin · 29/09/2008 10:05

um. top ups with formula isn't a great idea either, probably the one thing that's going to lead to giving up BFing.

VictorianSqualor · 29/09/2008 10:08

shoedweller.
If you top-up with formula but baby is already taking as much as they are willing, they will actually cut down their breast feeds and still have the same amount of milk anyway so instead of helping it starts to affect the breastfeeding yet baby still feeds the same amount.

Growth spurts are natural and all babies go through them, there is nothing you can do really except persevere.