You quoted my post which also says explictly:
"Charlotte is at fault here and if she's mistreated a horse then unfortunately she deserves whatever is coming her way. There's no excuse for hitting a horse, not ever. "
Of course the blame sits with Charlotte. I never said otherwise. In fact, I said very clearly that Charlotte is entirely at fault and deserves the punishment. She chose to strike a horse, she is entirely culpable. There's no ambiguity there so I'm not clear why you're trying to suggest I'm moving the blame?
What I'm saying is that if someone else had evidence that Charlotte was mistreating horses, and they deliberately sat on that evidence for tactical reasons, they were not putting the welfare of horses first as they are now claiming.
The statement says the anonymous complainant "long hesitated" about whether to submit a complaint. Bearing in mind an anonymous complaint can be made, I think it's beyond shitty that this evidence has been sat on for years.
Thinking that someone should have handed over the evidence sooner about a horse being abused to try and prevent any further mistreatment is not the same as suggesting the abuser isn't responsible.
Once again, just to be clear, Charlotte is responsible for any aggression or violence towards the horse/s.
Still doesn't mean that the video evidence shouldn't have been handed over sooner.