DH is a teacher. He's very conscientious, but I think he's being a bit TOO conscientious! Essentially, he doesn't think teachers are entitled to emergency parental leave under any circumstances. He had never heard of it, and said I was being ridiculous to suggest it.
The context for this was that I fell one day while out with the kids (3yo and baby). Realised I'd probably broken my arm, and would need to go to A&E. I also couldn't lift DD (baby), and had hit my head, and suddenly got very tired, so I was worried I'd faint while on my own with the kids (I had got us all home by this point).
DH was in work, but I knew that the afternoon was being spent with some theatre group who'd come in to work with them, so he was just supervising (with other teachers & assistants). The children were going home at 2, and then he was due to stay until 3. This all happened at lunch time, so I phoned him, explained what had happened, and asked whether he could come home early (there was no one else I could think of to call). This was firstly because I was worried I couldn't look after the kids (because I couldn't use 1 arm, and because I felt I could be about to pass out) and secondly so that I could go to A&E.
He said he couldn't; he had to stay until 3. I'd kind of understand if he was teaching his class all afternoon, but as I knew he was literally just sitting supervising, I had figured that it would be relatively easy for someone else to do that.
But in this case, should he be allowed to leave? Or is it just "not the done thing"?