You feel that I should strike because of potential changes to
"- sick pay
- length of school year, directed hours and school day
- structure of teacher working day
- non-contact/PPA time
- class sizes
- structure of school holidays
- maternity, paternity, adoption pay above statutory minima
- starting salary
- salary structure
- all pay progression rules, including proposals to reduce pay
- chief executive salaries
- probationary arrangements
- teacher qualifications and rules around unqualified people teaching
- redundancy pay (beyond statutory minimum)
- disciplinary processes
- grievance processes"
But having worked outside teaching, for employers with a very wide range of approaches to these things, I know that these things are, in the main, luxuries / discretionary. The statutory minimum is what many, many, many people in this country get in terms of sick pay, redundancy etc. Very few jobs have pay progression in the current economic climate, and salary scales vary wildly between employers. Non-contact and PPA time, though nice to have, are something many professionals do without, and different holiday arrangements and length of day would simply bring us closer to what most people regard as normal.
And yes, I work extraordinarily hard, for a salary very significantly less than I ever did in industry. I formatively mark 96 books daily, because a class size of 32 is the minimum where i work and every book must be fully parked for the next lesson, as this is the norm in primary. I arrive at school for 7.390 am and am frequently found - after a gap to look after my own children - marking at midnight.
I would protest for a better education for children, if that protest was in a form that got them MORE education, more time in school, better lessons with continued access to their daily hot meal and without depriving their parents of a day's wages. But I won't protest for better pay and conditions for me.