Concerns about William and Catherine's friendship with Tom Cruise

[Constantrunner]

Palace are reported to be concerned about Catherine and Williams growing friendship with tom cruise. They are concerned about them being recruited into Scientology.

Now I hope, that there is no realistic chance that they could be recruited into Scientology. But even having a future king and queen who are sympathetic to scientologists could help this cult. I do believe that Tom Cruise is becoming very friendly to Catherine and William to benefit Scientology in whatever way he can.

www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1418502-palace-concerned-over-tom-cruises-cozy-relationship-with-kate-middleton-heres-why

Ohh do share!!!! , I’m not Disney compatible! 🤣

Goodness, are you still wittering on? This is such a non-story, but it’s actually quite admirable that you’re still being Constant in your position on it.

Meanwhile, I have a sneaking suspicion that W&C have had a busy week or so, carrying out engagements, spending time with their kids, etc. Am sure that Tom is a distant memory in their rear view mirror. TBF though, I think Tom is just a teeny bit jealous of William.

😉

Don't believe everything ( if anything) you read in the tabloids.

Yes, many of us have tried to bring evidence and facts into play here. It doesn't seem to impact the OP.

If there’s anything I’ve learnt in my 39 years, it’s that having an opinion on someone else’s life will do literally zero.

The OP has been given this advice, but doesn't seem to have taken it on board.

Talk about flogging a dead horse. This isn't a source, it's gossip to drive clicks.

And frankly your comments about sources make no sense. Give it up, you've been told over pages and pages this is nonsense.

Or do you pick and choose which sources you believe based on what they say?

My irony meter just exploded.

Yeah, good luck with that. She really doesn't pay any heed.

It's like arguing with my mother. I'm getting triggered here 🙄

Or rather, trying to argue with my mother. As for flogging a dead horse, it occurs to me I'm doing the same thing and will stop.

Wise.

I think we can pick and choose ‘sources’ to a level.

What is entirely plausible.

And what is entirely shite.

Guess what category the OP falls under.

For the avoidance of doubt, the category referred to is the OP’s assertion/source and not the poster.

Reading it back it looks a touch ambiguous but I’m too late to edit.

Other important news about the Royal Family from my most reliable source:

https://theonion.com/king-charles-switches-to-more-comfortable-silicone-crown/

Ooh

https://www.ibtimes.com/tom-cruise-feuding-queen-elizabeth-ii-over-scientology-katie-holmes-ex-not-obsessed-2350462

Never - this is Charles the environmentalist, who is interested in heritage crafts.

He would have a crown made from straw grown on his own estates, using traditional millinery techniques.

But it’s in the news. How could we question it?

The onion is satire and you are being nasty.
I am used to royal supporters being nasty to anyone who criticises the royal family though.

I am not being nasty, I’m being silly. Because the whole premise is silly.

I am used to some lacking a sense of humor here, though. Particularly when their attempts to beat the royal family up backfires so spectacularly due to lack of credible sources.

And before you say it, I am not at all upset. I just recognise certain behaviour

This is nasty and untrue. Just because you don’t agree that your article lacks credible you don’t need to attack me personally.

As do I. Argue the point, not the person.

You have gotten personal here, not me. It’s uncalled for and against talk guidelines.

And now you’ve edited your post. If you’ve thought better of your personal attack on me then good.

Editing doesn't stop the original post being available to read.
Which I think is a good thing.