Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Charles Spencer to publish memoir of Diana

369 replies

OccasionalHope · 18/08/2026 18:58

Could be interesting.

OP posts:
BoldBeans · 19/08/2026 10:52

Charles Spencer is a very good writer- I read The White Ship and it's excellent, hadn't realised it was by that Charles Spencer and was quite surprised when I found out, which goes to show one shouldn't make assumptions.

kingtamponthefurred · 19/08/2026 10:57

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 10:26

My DM was one of those sobbing when she died. She travelled to London for the funeral and was one of those mourning on the Mall watching the coffin go by. Even as a child I thought it was absolutely bonkers.

I just thought 'why haven't people taken the cellophane off those flowers before putting them down - they can't be composted now!'

I was never a Diana worshipper but I did shed a tear as the funeral cortege drove out of London and people threw flowers in front of it. That was very memorable.

And the whole episode seems to have opened the floodgates for a lot of embarrassing emotional incontinence in this country in all kinds of ways.

And the whole episode seems to have opened the floodgates for a lot of embarrassing emotional incontinence in this country in all kinds of ways.

I agree. If I had to pinpoint the year when this country's collective common sense began trickling down the drain, I'd say 1997.

Dollymylove · 19/08/2026 10:58

Asunciondelaflata · 19/08/2026 10:41

I think you have the wrong poster. I never said anyone left the children "high and dry"? How strange.

They spent a lot of time with Charles at Balmoral that summer. As I understand it.

Yes thats right. The Queen spent summers at Balmoral and If memory serves, thats where the boys were when the news of their mothers death broke.
The poor Queen was horribly slated for not immediately dashing down to London to address her "subjects"
Those entitled, selfish subjects didnt seem to have the brains to realise that she stayed at Balmoral to comfort and shield her grandsons who had just lost their mum.
That was the correct decision imho

Franpie · 19/08/2026 11:06

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 19/08/2026 10:50

Well either you believe she did it herself or she had lackeys do it for her. You can’t deny either with the homeless, AIDS and other hospital charities plus mine work abroad that she must’ve understood what she was doing. She shook hands with people with aids and brought her children along on visits. She helped clear the land mines abroad.

Yes. She wasn’t bright at school. But she had common sense. Yes she did silly things like her infamous interview but she was probably persuaded by the wrong people that this was the right thing to do.

Of course she had people to brief her. All celebrities who shine a light on a cause do. I agree, she chose amazing causes to support and significantly reduced the stigma of AIDS at the time, as did others. Her landmine awareness work was also amazing.

But I don’t think she had any common sense whatsoever I’m afraid.

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 11:07

Dollymylove · 19/08/2026 10:58

Yes thats right. The Queen spent summers at Balmoral and If memory serves, thats where the boys were when the news of their mothers death broke.
The poor Queen was horribly slated for not immediately dashing down to London to address her "subjects"
Those entitled, selfish subjects didnt seem to have the brains to realise that she stayed at Balmoral to comfort and shield her grandsons who had just lost their mum.
That was the correct decision imho

Prince Philip was told by a bystander “Make sure you look after those boys!” He replied (very restrainedly, I thought), “Yes, that’s what we’re trying to do.”

Theres a lot of stuff out there about how the public’s view of the Queen/PP changed as a result of Diana’s death but I bet the RF’s view of Joe Public changed a lot too!

I mean - can you imagine saying something so crass in those circumstances, when the baying mob of the press had forced them to bring the boys back from the seclusion of Balmoral?

Coinkidinki · 19/08/2026 11:14

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 10:22

@Dollymylove

I think that's right. Diana basically broke up Will Carling's marriage and was found to have been harrassing other married men with silent phone calls etc - someone called Gilbey? Hasnet Khan walked away - wise chap.

She could have attracted almost anyone yet she went off with Dodi Fayed. I'm sorry - I know attraction is entirely personal, but what a sleazebag. Did she really fancy him? It can't have been the money - she wasn't short of money.

I just do not understand what she saw in that man, and it was because of him and his horrible father that she was put in fatal danger.

Diana wasn't short of money in the sense that any normal person would understand, but she had nowhere near the insane level of wealth of the Fayeds. She had to 'manage her money' to an extent, i.e. there were some wild extravagances that were beyond her purse. The wealth and lifestyle on offer might have been a draw.

Gloriia · 19/08/2026 11:14

BoldBeans · 19/08/2026 10:52

Charles Spencer is a very good writer- I read The White Ship and it's excellent, hadn't realised it was by that Charles Spencer and was quite surprised when I found out, which goes to show one shouldn't make assumptions.

I don't think anyone is questioning his literacy skills.

Gloriia · 19/08/2026 11:18

Franpie · 19/08/2026 11:06

Of course she had people to brief her. All celebrities who shine a light on a cause do. I agree, she chose amazing causes to support and significantly reduced the stigma of AIDS at the time, as did others. Her landmine awareness work was also amazing.

But I don’t think she had any common sense whatsoever I’m afraid.

She also chose the high profile 'shocking' stories. So yes lovely shake hands with AIDS patients and wander around a minefield, not so much opening a leisure centre in Grimsby. Harry takes after her in that regard.

Franpie · 19/08/2026 11:21

Gloriia · 19/08/2026 11:18

She also chose the high profile 'shocking' stories. So yes lovely shake hands with AIDS patients and wander around a minefield, not so much opening a leisure centre in Grimsby. Harry takes after her in that regard.

Yes, I agree with you there.

BoldBeans · 19/08/2026 11:22

Gloriia · 19/08/2026 11:14

I don't think anyone is questioning his literacy skills.

Weird response to a general remark not addressed to you.

Gloriia · 19/08/2026 11:28

BoldBeans · 19/08/2026 11:22

Weird response to a general remark not addressed to you.

You didn't quote anyone? Who were you addressing? I thought was just a contribution like any other.

Anywayyy I stand by what I said and there's nothing weird about my post. It doesn't matter if his previous books were well written, it's the content of this one that is the problem.

kingtamponthefurred · 19/08/2026 11:30

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 10:22

@Dollymylove

I think that's right. Diana basically broke up Will Carling's marriage and was found to have been harrassing other married men with silent phone calls etc - someone called Gilbey? Hasnet Khan walked away - wise chap.

She could have attracted almost anyone yet she went off with Dodi Fayed. I'm sorry - I know attraction is entirely personal, but what a sleazebag. Did she really fancy him? It can't have been the money - she wasn't short of money.

I just do not understand what she saw in that man, and it was because of him and his horrible father that she was put in fatal danger.

I doubt that she was ever in love with Dodi or that she would have stayed with him long term. Going off with him was more likely a post-divorce summer fling, and a supremely effective way of giving the finger to the Palace in general and her ex-husband in particular.

Filoparcels017 · 19/08/2026 11:42

Pollqueen · 18/08/2026 19:23

Guess after his 4th divorce, Spencer is in need of cash. Vile man and is there really anything to say about Diana that hasn't already been said multiple times?

He was also estranged from her after the divorce because he refused to offer her sanctuary at Althorp

I do wish people would stop repeating this inaccurate nonsense.

Charles Spencer successfully sued the Times and the Mail for publishing this story.

https://people.com/royals/princess-dianas-brother-charles-spencer-wins-new-legal-victory-over-lie-that-he-deprived-diana-of-a-home/

That it is so widely believed to be true should give people pause for thought that the narratives they are being fed by certain factions of the British media are not always to be believed. It’s not hard to understand why! The coverage outside of the UK is far more balanced.

The thirtieth anniversary of Diana’s death is fast approaching, there were always going to be books written. I’m just glad that CS has taken it upon himself to protect his sister and write the definitive version himself.

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 11:47

kingtamponthefurred · 19/08/2026 11:30

I doubt that she was ever in love with Dodi or that she would have stayed with him long term. Going off with him was more likely a post-divorce summer fling, and a supremely effective way of giving the finger to the Palace in general and her ex-husband in particular.

And - if I remember rightly - there was a theory that it was to try and make Hasnet Khan jealous and get him to change his mind. I think it was Hasnet she really loved. He was a heart surgeon and a much more wholesome character than Dodi!

We'll never know now. She did apparently tell a friend in the weeks before she died that 'What I'm going to do next will shock everybody!' Ironic, with hindsight. But we'll never know what that was.

Filoparcels017 · 19/08/2026 11:48

mysticbob · 18/08/2026 19:45

Christ. Just let the woman rest FFS. Her brother banged on about her being pursued by those wanting to publicise every aspect of her existence during her lifetime, but apparently isn’t above exploiting now she’s dead and he needs a few quid.

Seeing as Althorp contains one of Europe's finest private collections of art, furniture, and ceramics in existence, I doubt his motivations are solely financial.

If anyone on this thread has seen inaccurate stories about a member of their family, or anyone they know, written about in the press, they would understand the urge to provide an accurate record.

I’m looking forward to reading it.

Ukisgaslit · 19/08/2026 11:49

@Filoparcels017

I agree. The tabloid narrative / Windsor manipulation is what interests me .

I’ve no doubt there is a lot to come out. There will be obvious attempts to discredit Spencer - just as there were with Lownie - and they won’t work. I expect the book will be a best seller .

Though I’d prefer proper focus on Andrew / Epstein and any other links that the Windsors may have to the Epstein class.

Jimsaidpeoplearestrange · 19/08/2026 11:50

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 09:03

Plenty of ideas explained above for you.

and my idea is , why not

WishINeverPlantedMint · 19/08/2026 11:56

@Filoparcels017- Althrop is all in trust, he can’t access that cash. And poverty is all relative depending on your lifestyle expectations (and about of divorces and kids you need to fund)

bananaobama · 19/08/2026 11:58

Gosh, she’s practically been forgotten. Will be lovely to resurrect her memory

🙄
poor old Charlie must need some cash to keep the estate running

Filoparcels017 · 19/08/2026 11:58

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 19/08/2026 10:50

Well either you believe she did it herself or she had lackeys do it for her. You can’t deny either with the homeless, AIDS and other hospital charities plus mine work abroad that she must’ve understood what she was doing. She shook hands with people with aids and brought her children along on visits. She helped clear the land mines abroad.

Yes. She wasn’t bright at school. But she had common sense. Yes she did silly things like her infamous interview but she was probably persuaded by the wrong people that this was the right thing to do.

She wasn’t just persuaded, she was the victim of a calculated deception and presented with fake bank statements which had been commissioned by Martin Bashir to persuade her that royal staff were being paid to spy on her.

This led in no small part in her decision to divest herself of royal protection, which ultimately played a part in her untimely death.

The BBC had to publish a public apology for breaching editorial standards and Martin Bashir was completely discredited as a journalist.

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 11:59

WishINeverPlantedMint · 19/08/2026 11:56

@Filoparcels017- Althrop is all in trust, he can’t access that cash. And poverty is all relative depending on your lifestyle expectations (and about of divorces and kids you need to fund)

Althorp will cost a fortune to run and as you say - he can’t necessarily just sell stuff.

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 12:02

Ukisgaslit · 19/08/2026 11:49

@Filoparcels017

I agree. The tabloid narrative / Windsor manipulation is what interests me .

I’ve no doubt there is a lot to come out. There will be obvious attempts to discredit Spencer - just as there were with Lownie - and they won’t work. I expect the book will be a best seller .

Though I’d prefer proper focus on Andrew / Epstein and any other links that the Windsors may have to the Epstein class.

As long as he doesn’t try to tale the moral high ground about marital fidelity!

Curlygirl06 · 19/08/2026 12:08

Franpie · 19/08/2026 10:22

You’re right, I wasn’t there, well I was but I was a child.

The questionable choices as a mother I was referring to was all the dirty laundry being aired in public. The boys watching that awful interview at Eton, the book, the lot really. Charles was no better but we’re talking about Diana.

I’ve just always been baffled by the interest and love for a pretty flawed person. I don’t think she was evil, just an ordinary aristocrat of which we have plenty in this country.

My DM was one of those sobbing when she died. She travelled to London for the funeral and was one of those mourning on the Mall watching the coffin go by. Even as a child I thought it was absolutely bonkers.

One of the women I worked with took her 3 children to London to sign the books of condolence. They were primary school age if I remember, and it was still the school holidays. I thought that was a bit odd, they had to queue for 8 hours, it was hot and having to entertain 3 kids for that length of time was bat shit crazy!
However, she later thought of something else to write in the book that she'd forgotten so she did it all again.

Filoparcels017 · 19/08/2026 12:13

WishINeverPlantedMint · 19/08/2026 11:56

@Filoparcels017- Althrop is all in trust, he can’t access that cash. And poverty is all relative depending on your lifestyle expectations (and about of divorces and kids you need to fund)

Yes of course the collections are in trust but
Althorp is completely independently run and is not affiliated with the National Trust for example. It remains entirely under private family control and I am sure if something had to be sold to fix the roof, for example, it would be done. I seem to remember that his late step-mother Raine managed to sell off plenty of furnishings and paintings when married to Johnny when she needed to raise funds.

thenightsky · 19/08/2026 12:14

CoffeeCantata · 19/08/2026 11:47

And - if I remember rightly - there was a theory that it was to try and make Hasnet Khan jealous and get him to change his mind. I think it was Hasnet she really loved. He was a heart surgeon and a much more wholesome character than Dodi!

We'll never know now. She did apparently tell a friend in the weeks before she died that 'What I'm going to do next will shock everybody!' Ironic, with hindsight. But we'll never know what that was.

Yes, I remember that was the story at the time. Make HK jealous and make that intriguing statement about what she was going to do to surprise everyone.

Swipe left for the next trending thread