Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Why is Prince George not going to secondary school until after he turns 13?

122 replies

MinnieMounjaro · 26/05/2026 10:16

Prince William reveals Prince George, 12, is already boarding at £10,669-a-term Lambrook School mol.im/a/15846933 via https://dailym.ai/android

I saw this article in the DM saying Prince George is currently boarding at Lambrook "ahead of moving to his secondary school in September". He turns 13 in July so the thought occurred to me - why is he still in primary school? Should he not have started secondary in 2024 when he was 11?

OP posts:
NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 02:46

ChaseTheSin · Yesterday 02:38

Totally agree - he will lead a life of unparalleled privilege and eye watering wealth. He can already see his parents spend most of their time on holiday. I wouldn’t feel too sorry for him 😀

I don't know, his life is mapped out for him, and much of it sounds pretty boring. It's the ultimate gilded cage.

I don't think I could ever have married William (not that he asked! 🤣) because it does condemn your children to this gilded cage.

Scarlettjune · Yesterday 02:57

MargoLivebetter · 26/05/2026 10:46

Traditionally, private schools took pupils after they had done their Common Entrance exams aged 13. Many private senior schools therefore don't take pupils until the start of Year 9 eg: Eton, Wellington, Winchester, Bradfield etc. Lambrook is a prep school (not a primary school), which means they keep pupils until that point, preparing them for Common Entrance exams.

And yet we all feed the beast of the royal family system

Ohpleeeease · Yesterday 08:10

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 02:43

So yours were flexi and were allowed to move at their own pace, and only boarded during the week, and only after they had made lots of friends. This is a different proposition from what's usually understood by boarding, which is where a child is some distance from home and only goes home in the holidays, and where contact with parents is discouraged for the first three weeks. Where they are dropped off not knowing anyone and just have to stick it out.

And that's bad enough for children who are 13. Don't get me started on early boarding. (Real boarding, not flexi boarding/weekly boarding like yours did.)

Edited

Boarding has changed since the 1950s.

Newname26 · Yesterday 09:42

ExOptimist · Yesterday 01:44

Hardly depressing. He's going to be a king, he's known that from the minute he was capable of understanding.

Yes he'll do those things, but he'll have immense wealth, will never ever need to worry or even think about money, move in the highest social circles, have fantastic properties available to live in, be able to travel the world. He will have handed to him all the material privileges, multiplied many times over, that people wish for their children.

He can also do many of the things that he might want to do as hobbies. Fly a plane, do various sports, climb mountains, be an artist, write poetry, play the stock market, play any musical instrument.

Ok the country may lose in him a potentially brilliant surgeon or hugely inspiring teacher, but he'll be absolutely fine. He's been trained from birth for the life he'll lead.

There is a choice, it's a hard one but it's there and has been done already by Edward VIII.

Who knows if this is right or wrong but I read a report that Prince William wasn't told he was going to be King. It was a child at school who told him.

Who knows when George was told about his future.
He does have more choice than William he won't necessarily have to do military service.

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · Yesterday 09:46

Floppyearedlab · 26/05/2026 10:58

What a shame he has to board.
With all the excellent private day schools in London, and it's not like he would have to battle on the tube to get to any of them...

Mine had the option of flexi boarding at prep, they loved one night a week, had the best time.

BlossomBlossomBlossom · Yesterday 09:51

what's usually understood by boarding, which is where a child is some distance from home and only goes home in the holidays, and where contact with parents is discouraged for the first three weeks. Where they are dropped off not knowing anyone and just have to stick it out.

This is utter crap and you clearly know nothing about actual contemporary boarding at responsible schools, @NameChangeMay2026.

For current parents, racing up and down the motorway or living on trains to and from the school can be pretty much a full time job. ‘Only goes home in the holidays’ my arse! While the youngest in our family was at one of the prominent schools being discussed on this thread, they were rarely at school for more than two or three weeks at a time and we could see them on pretty much any day we liked, in person. As well as for virtually unlimited time, outside lessons, on FaceTime. contact with parents is discouraged for the first three weeks. Nope! Wrong again. They were FaceTiming us with all the exciting newness of it all whenever they had time. From the start. ‘Dropped off not knowing anyone’. Again, wrong. Even if they hadn’t come up from a prep with several of their little playmates, it’s part of the housemaster’s job to ensure all the new boys in his house have met and spent some time together before the start of the academic year. And it’s the duty of older pupils to help them acclimatise.

The other obvious thing is that by the time a boy joins the school he’d have spent plenty of time there during the application and entry process. And decided he liked it and enjoyed being there. Absolutely no question of being dropped off in a strange environment and abandoned there till Christmas.

Why not do some research before spouting nonsense?

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 10:45

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 02:44

Let's face it, living at school is just weird. Was useful when parents were abroad during the Empire. But those days are over.

Coming from a state school, I also think it's pretty weird to pay to go to school, tbh.

Coming from a state school, I also think it's pretty weird to pay to go to school, tbh.

This may be a situation to consider the term 'check your privilege'.

If you've never had to think about those children who have specific needs that can't be met by the local state school, you are indeed privileged.

IdaGlossop · Yesterday 16:37

LeedsLoiner · 26/05/2026 11:18

It's not like he needs an education he's already got a job for life?

Just what Britain needs. A monarch with no formal secondary education, even less able to relate to its citizens than extreme wealth already makes it, and with highly educated courtiers whose respect for the monarch will diminish.

BreakingBroken · Yesterday 16:43

@IdaGlossop can you explain why you think the education he’s getting at Lambrook is “not a formal education”.
There is no indication he won’t attend a secondary at 13 or attend uni and receive a full education.
Lambrook has an excellent reputation.

IdaGlossop · Yesterday 16:50

BreakingBroken · Yesterday 16:43

@IdaGlossop can you explain why you think the education he’s getting at Lambrook is “not a formal education”.
There is no indication he won’t attend a secondary at 13 or attend uni and receive a full education.
Lambrook has an excellent reputation.

I am being sarcastic, in response to @LeedsLoiner saying he doesn't need a formal education because he has a job lined up. Of course he will attend a secondary and probably university too. My post refers to formal secondary education, to distinguish it from the formal prep education he is receiving at Lambrook.

Typo

BlossomBlossomBlossom · Yesterday 16:52

@BreakingBroken you may want to look up ‘sardonicism’, and words to that effect, and then re-examine @IdaGlossop’s post!

BlossomBlossomBlossom · Yesterday 16:52

(Slow typing!)

CurlewKate · Yesterday 19:22

I think boarding school is generally an appalling idea-but I do think it might be a very good thing for George. A chance for him to have an almost normal life.

BreakingBroken · Yesterday 19:38

Lambrook offers flexi and weekly boarding so no one is really staying there full time weeks on end.
He most likely is staying over/flexi based on school or parent events.

Weeallthewayhome · Yesterday 19:42

So that when he arrives he’ll be better prepared to fight the buggers orf and kneel to make their toast

viques · Yesterday 19:43

ExOptimist · Yesterday 01:44

Hardly depressing. He's going to be a king, he's known that from the minute he was capable of understanding.

Yes he'll do those things, but he'll have immense wealth, will never ever need to worry or even think about money, move in the highest social circles, have fantastic properties available to live in, be able to travel the world. He will have handed to him all the material privileges, multiplied many times over, that people wish for their children.

He can also do many of the things that he might want to do as hobbies. Fly a plane, do various sports, climb mountains, be an artist, write poetry, play the stock market, play any musical instrument.

Ok the country may lose in him a potentially brilliant surgeon or hugely inspiring teacher, but he'll be absolutely fine. He's been trained from birth for the life he'll lead.

There is a choice, it's a hard one but it's there and has been done already by Edward VIII.

Let’s hope it all works out better for him than for his great great uncle David oh and and Uncle Harry, not to mention great Uncle Andrew.

Araminta1003 · Yesterday 19:47

This is just the Daily Mail obsessing again about where Prince George is headed next , because that story of speculation hasn’t been running for years and selling for some very bizarre reason!
And so the implication is look George is practising his boarding, so clearly he will be off to some posh boarding school. Yes thanks Daily Mail, we know Prince George is going to some posh boarding school because you have been speculating about which one for years!

BunnyBunbunbun · Yesterday 20:13

viques · 26/05/2026 13:49

It’s probably the nearest he gets to going on a sleep over at a mates house. OK for friends to stay over with the Wales, but the ramifications of him going to stay with his best friend must be a nightmare. At least Charlotte has the Phillips and Tindall girl cousins of more or less her age to chill out with, George and Louis are a bit deprived in the cousin department.

Kinda weird that you're so interested in the personal lives of small children, but aside from George and Louis each having a brother, they have first cousins on their mum's side and probably have other boy second cousins through their mum too. Lucas Tindall is only three years younger than Louis. Camilla has grandsons, albeit a little older, but at a good "fun" role model age for George. Their parents probably also have friends with kids around their age. Somehow I doubt that George and Louis are bereft of company and friends. If anything, they have a rich social life and do lots of fun things.

gatorlizzie · Yesterday 23:58

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 02:46

I don't know, his life is mapped out for him, and much of it sounds pretty boring. It's the ultimate gilded cage.

I don't think I could ever have married William (not that he asked! 🤣) because it does condemn your children to this gilded cage.

How does that compare to the gilded cage of the Sussex children being hidden from view like Flowers in the Attic ?

bafta16 · Today 09:42

I wonder how play dates are set up?

viques · Today 13:22

BunnyBunbunbun · Yesterday 20:13

Kinda weird that you're so interested in the personal lives of small children, but aside from George and Louis each having a brother, they have first cousins on their mum's side and probably have other boy second cousins through their mum too. Lucas Tindall is only three years younger than Louis. Camilla has grandsons, albeit a little older, but at a good "fun" role model age for George. Their parents probably also have friends with kids around their age. Somehow I doubt that George and Louis are bereft of company and friends. If anything, they have a rich social life and do lots of fun things.

Well, you know a lot .🤔

And you think I am weird for being “ interested in the lives of small children”. I am not the one wearing out my google finger.

viques · Today 13:24

gatorlizzie · Yesterday 23:58

How does that compare to the gilded cage of the Sussex children being hidden from view like Flowers in the Attic ?

Hidden in plain sight more likely. MM is absolutely itching to monetise those kids. I expect she has got them learning show tunes and tap dancing so they will really bring in the likes and clicks!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page