Further pr discussions with the lone gunman now in charge!

[jeffgoldblum]

im hoping that @Atlusvuewill not mind me continuing her work, I have a feeling that there is more to discuss and come!

Do you have any relevant comments about H and M s PR?

@AtIusvue, keep calm and carry on! 👍

I don’t want to repeat everything I said previously however Princess Anne visiting a Retirement Home is never going to generate news unless she started a naked conga or something . She and other working royals are just getting on with stuff .
As far as AMW is concerned , the almost universal opinion is that he is a despicable, arrogant , untrustworthy person . If every poster on a thread agrees there really isn’t much of a discussion is there ?
Poster 1 “ don’t you think AMW is awful because of xyz?”
Poster 2” I agree”
Poster 3 “ I agree”
But each time new allegations emerge , they will be discussed .
Maybe if H and M didn’t make such a pig’s ear of everything and just “ showed up and do good”, there wouldn’t be as many threads .

Who would you like to discuss @Slothing?

Let’s not encourage the derailing mylovely , there are ample threads available for posters to discuss Andrew , C and W , Christmas Day walks etc..

Which people say this?

It could be a bit of both.

H has never struck me as a person who takes time to introspect. This is someone who, decades after his mother took him to visit homeless shelters, decided as a fully grown man in his thirties that his distress at having the smaller half of his DGM's palace nursery was a real grievance worth sharing. His default setting seems to be "the victimiest victim that ever victimed".

On the other hand, all of us over a certain age, have experienced our moments of denial where we have refused to face the truth about a loved one, a friend or a situation, because we are trying to avoid the raw emotional fallout. And for some time, however false and fleeting, denial provides a refuge from pain. So H, could very well be in denial to avoid dealing with fallout.

My new wish for 2026 is that Princess Anne will start a naked conga at a retirement home.

It’s been proffered on a different platform that H and m really don’t want people noticing or discussing their loss of two big members of staff particularly the pr queen! , so obviously that means I wish to discuss this further! 🤣 but I can’t help but think about the upcoming January court case… unreliable witness that’s recanted his statement that got many onboard….paying for witnesses and evidence….aggressive means of gathering evidence…. A judge who has had enough! , it’s going to be very interesting and what pr will that produce I wonder 🤔

Oh and I’m sorry ladies! , I’ve been honoured on Reddit once again! , commiserations for those not mentioned this time.💐
special thanks to Jamie! 👋

I wonder what Meghan has written in the sand this year?!

Yes, I am ready for that.

Interesting discussion, thanks

lol but I think princess Margaret was more of a naked conga kinda gal 🤩

That was my comment @Jbum- I made a ‘fat finger’ typo … I don’t tend to use words that mean one thing for a different meaning like Megain (purposeful typo here). I wasn’t publishing a ‘polished article / programme’ it was a quick response to a thread that I didn’t bother to proof read. I’ve noticed you’ve made a load of spelling mistakes, yet I’ve not ‘clapped back’ at you … unless there was a word I used out of context / malaprop in which case let me know and I’ll either explain it or learn from my mistake

I'm catching up and have only got this far but this. So much this.

"Instead of just showing up to collect humanitarian of the year awards, try doing actual humanitarian work."

And the RAVEC review. Wonder what the PR will produce for that outcome? If Liam Maguire has any sense he won't allow a TV interview crew within 2 miles of either if his clients - unless of course the review goes Harry's way, and then all bets are off (highly unlikely outcome, but never say never).

Really we should never find out about the outcome but I suspect we will because Harry can’t keep his gob shut, and he will either want to gloat about the outcome if it goes his way or kick off about it if it doesn’t.

Sensible as always, MrsLF

Trouble is that would involve focusing on the needs of others, and others only seem to be of use for photo ops, PR and silly speeches about how wonderful they are in driving compassion which is notably absent in their personal dealings

Can I just clarify ; is Harry wanting 24/7 armed security provided only in the U.K. or is he wanting it regardless of where he is ?
I recall the statement ( which was removed) that he was an IPP and wondered if that’s what he is hankering after .

The word was “ uswra “ chunky obviously a slip for “us” or “use” , we all knew what it meant at the time , there was no reason to mention it , no you didn’t use a word incorrectly.

This is the rub mylovely , nobody including Harry seems to know what he actually wants! 🤷‍♀️
I think personally that he wants his security funded by taxpayers wherever he is ( but I imagine his advisers have probably told him that this is A never going to happen B not going to be popular)

That open letter in The Times is brilliant

They do need to change their rhetoric. Even in the magazine article before Christmas it was notable that when meeting school children Meghan talked about her experiences rather than asking about theirs. Humanitarian work needs to be focused outwards not inwards.

So I have a question that had never occurred to me before. Was Harry ever an IPP? Did he just assume he was because William was and because he had full time security at that point in his life?