Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Jason Knauf Documentary

85 replies

isaknowsbest · 23/02/2025 21:07

www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1285179-former-royal-aide-teases-explosive-revelations-on-williams-reign-harrys-future

60 Mins Australia to release Jason Knauf documentary.

OP posts:
Ohpleeeease · 27/02/2025 18:54

IdaGlossop · 27/02/2025 17:16

I take the rap for introducing it into this thread. It may or may not be true, like so many things in this saga. That's why I said 'apparently'.

I heard something similar actually but a different child and scenario. Which makes me think it was just a rumour which grew in the telling.

wordler · 27/02/2025 20:19

Ohpleeeease · 27/02/2025 18:54

I heard something similar actually but a different child and scenario. Which makes me think it was just a rumour which grew in the telling.

I agree that it’s more likely to be an unverified rumour or story that has taken on life of its own.

My view is it was probably based on something far more innocent - like taking photos inside Windsor castle or BP - most people would do it instinctively if they suddenly got access to behind the scenes in a place like that. I know I would. Or just the way people take photos during family occasions.

But Kate and William are known to be very private about their personal off duty lives and they’ve guarded that privacy well - no staff, friend or relation has ever leaked anything - so anyone new to the family probably gets cautioned about taking pics of the kids in case they get hacked etc.

But then you get the Chinese whispers of Meghan being advised about photo protocol turns into she was sneaking into Charlotte’s bedroom at night.

InishBiggle · 27/02/2025 21:05

I googled JK and was reading about a court case about MM and a letter where he said he wished he had given evidence earlier in the trial - anyone know what this was about and what his point was - I was confused!

Ohpleeeease · 27/02/2025 21:56

wordler · 27/02/2025 20:19

I agree that it’s more likely to be an unverified rumour or story that has taken on life of its own.

My view is it was probably based on something far more innocent - like taking photos inside Windsor castle or BP - most people would do it instinctively if they suddenly got access to behind the scenes in a place like that. I know I would. Or just the way people take photos during family occasions.

But Kate and William are known to be very private about their personal off duty lives and they’ve guarded that privacy well - no staff, friend or relation has ever leaked anything - so anyone new to the family probably gets cautioned about taking pics of the kids in case they get hacked etc.

But then you get the Chinese whispers of Meghan being advised about photo protocol turns into she was sneaking into Charlotte’s bedroom at night.

I thought exactly the same @wordler , Meghan was a lifestyle blogger who found herself in places she could only have dreamed of, it would be entirely understandable she might want to record that IF IT HAPPENED.

Jacquettes · 28/02/2025 10:49

isaknowsbest · 27/02/2025 00:44

Are you saying that all women should support other women and not use their voice purely because they are a woman? Like all black women should support black women because of a shared skin colour?

No.

Nowhere in my post did I say any of that.

Serenster · 28/02/2025 11:54

InishBiggle · 27/02/2025 21:05

I googled JK and was reading about a court case about MM and a letter where he said he wished he had given evidence earlier in the trial - anyone know what this was about and what his point was - I was confused!

This was covered when Jason Knauf’s gave evidence to support ANL’s defence of Meghan’s claim for breaching her copyright by publishing extracts of her letter to her father.

Both Meghan and ANL had approached Knauf shortly after the claim was first filed, and each asked him to give evidence to support them (this is completely normal, the court is simply interested to hear evidence from people about the facts that they have personal knowledge of, and it does not consider a witness to “belong” to one side or another). Initially, Knauf’s response to both sides was to say that his position was "strictly neutral" and he did not wish to have any involvement in the proceedings.

As the case developed however Meghan gave witness statements and made submissions to the court that were misleading about what Knauf himself had done (she said none of her staff had done any fact-checking of Finding Freedom, and she also said she’d never authorised her staff to have any involvement with Omid Scobie and the book). Meghan won her case in the High Court, and ANL appealed.

Knauf knew the statement made by Meghan, Omid Scobie and her legal team were untrue, so he made contact with ANL to let them know that he was willing to provide a statement from them to use in the appeal. It was at that stage that the comment was made that he regretted not giving evidence during the original High Court case.

InishBiggle · 28/02/2025 12:49

InishBiggle · 26/02/2025 23:18

What about the consistent and persistent reports of Meghan's bullying behaviour over many years on both sides of the pond?

How do you personally reconcile the testimonies of dozens of victims and witnesses who have experienced and been impacted by her behaviour to the point that some have been hounded out of their jobs and ended up needing professional help to alleviate the mental distress she caused as investigated by numerous and separate respected publications?

Still waiting @Jacquettes

Sinkintotheswamp · 28/02/2025 13:00

LizzieSiddal · 26/02/2025 19:52

Do you have source for that?

There was something on blind gossip years ago about photos of the children overstepping the boundary. I don't recall anything about them sleeping though.

Jacquettes · 28/02/2025 21:15

InishBiggle · 28/02/2025 12:49

Still waiting @Jacquettes

WTF?

LizzieSiddal · 28/02/2025 22:02

Sinkintotheswamp · 28/02/2025 13:00

There was something on blind gossip years ago about photos of the children overstepping the boundary. I don't recall anything about them sleeping though.

Oh it must be true then. 🤔

Nono22972 · 01/03/2025 14:54

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/02/2025 12:00

The only people who want Harry and Meghan to become working royals again are the press. Then they can write endless articles comparing Meghan and Catherine and stir up trouble for clicks. They are running out of material as things stand.

Exactly! All these people probably all moved on and are not thinking about each other but the media need this feud to continue to have something to write about

MissFenellaPrism · 01/03/2025 14:57

Nono22972 · 01/03/2025 14:54

Exactly! All these people probably all moved on and are not thinking about each other but the media need this feud to continue to have something to write about

True.

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/03/2025 20:46

And William and Catherine public profile is pretty dull and very private. Not good for media clicks.
Nearly every article about William for example, includes details about Harry and Meghan, as that is the only way the press can get readers interest.

MissFenellaPrism · 01/03/2025 22:04

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/03/2025 20:46

And William and Catherine public profile is pretty dull and very private. Not good for media clicks.
Nearly every article about William for example, includes details about Harry and Meghan, as that is the only way the press can get readers interest.

That's strange. I've read a lot of articles about them recently with no mention of the Sussexes.

LovelyJubly12 · 01/03/2025 22:06

Mylovelygreendress · 26/02/2025 19:43

Apparently Maria ( Nanny) caught her .

If that is true it’s shocking

smilesy · 01/03/2025 22:29

MissFenellaPrism · 01/03/2025 22:04

That's strange. I've read a lot of articles about them recently with no mention of the Sussexes.

Yea. I read one today about him speaking Welsh as it’s St David’s day. No mention of the Sussexes 🤷‍♀️

MissFenellaPrism · 01/03/2025 22:39

smilesy · 01/03/2025 22:29

Yea. I read one today about him speaking Welsh as it’s St David’s day. No mention of the Sussexes 🤷‍♀️

Yes, the same when they went to make the Welsh cakes. No mention in the report of the Sussexes.

jeffgoldblum · 02/03/2025 00:02

Now , now ! Don't be letting facts get in the way of a good critiqueathon!

JoyousGreyOrca · 02/03/2025 01:37

Nearly every article.
Just as threads on here about Meghan and Harry attract many more comments than ones about William and Catherine.
Harry and Meghan went to the US nearly five years ago, and yet we even get a recent thread about Meghan's mother. You all cant stop talking about them, and are much more interested in Harry and Meghan than anyone else in the Royal family.

Serenster · 02/03/2025 06:50

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/03/2025 20:46

And William and Catherine public profile is pretty dull and very private. Not good for media clicks.
Nearly every article about William for example, includes details about Harry and Meghan, as that is the only way the press can get readers interest.

I also don’t think that’s true. I just googled “Kate William Pontypridd” and it wasn’t until halfway down page six of the results in News that there was headline that mentioned one of the Sussexes (Harry in that case).

Given headlines are the very way that the media gets readers’ interest, you would expect far more mention of Meghan and Harry if they were the drawcard.

MrsLeonFarrell · 02/03/2025 07:29

Articles used to mention the Sussexes but these days articles on the Waleses focus on them and what they are doing. Any articles I've seen recently that mention both date back to the Queen's funeral. I'm glad because the causes they are supporting and the places they go deserve publicity.

myrtleWilson · 02/03/2025 07:34

True, no mention of H&M in the stories about Lloyd’s supporting Homewards - and I even checked the Mail and People magazines. I had a quick look at other PPoW stories on the Mail and couldn’t see any H and M references from this week - perhaps the OP has a spreadsheet covering a longer timeframe.

The mail is a fan of story splicing/gamifying article where they use multiple/varied click throughs to the same story - this gives the appearance of there being more stories than there actually are and at the same time, provides the Mail with data insight on readers motivations to read stories. However, interestingly the article about the Princess of Wales’ recycled Ralph Lauren jacket she wore in Wales (which broadens out into story on other re-wears) doesn’t reference Meghan at all (not even when referencing some very long purple trousers Catherine wore!) Perhaps the gamification data shows readers don’t like the linking stories anymore?

Gossip/Slagging off sites like celebitchy do always try to make a link to H&M in their stories about K&W - see recent post on welsh cakes where we learn that in CB’s eyes that Catherine looked like the dough would bite her (check for eating disorder hint), whereas food is love language for M. There is less of a pretence that the articles are written with a straight bat as they are always positioned both pictorially and verbally as an invitation to bash certain celebrities/royals

I suppose it comes down to where you source your news.

Did Mumsnet get back to you on the glitch you were asking them to look into @JoyousGreyOrca

Mylovelygreendress · 02/03/2025 07:42

JoyousGreyOrca · 02/03/2025 01:37

Nearly every article.
Just as threads on here about Meghan and Harry attract many more comments than ones about William and Catherine.
Harry and Meghan went to the US nearly five years ago, and yet we even get a recent thread about Meghan's mother. You all cant stop talking about them, and are much more interested in Harry and Meghan than anyone else in the Royal family.

H and M provide endless entertainment which is why they are discussed .

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 02/03/2025 07:44

They also put themselves out there. If they didn’t want to be talked about they would most likely and eventually fade into the background.

Spare, NF, Oprah, With Love Meghan, suggests that they do actually want to be talked about.

MissFenellaPrism · 02/03/2025 07:45

No, it's not true. I've just scanned through a few recent articles about William and Kate. Nothing at all on the Sussexes.
Nada.
Although, as pp said, maybe it's how you source your information, @JoyousGreyOrca ? I'm just looking at regular news outlets.