Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Happy birthday George

98 replies

Mylovelygreendress · 22/07/2024 09:35

New photo

Happy birthday George
OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Wickerchaize · 22/07/2024 20:52

NoWayItWas · 22/07/2024 20:29

Kate, William, and their children are all very attractive. Don't let it get to you!

Get to me? Kate is conventionally attractive and always looks lovely. William isn't conventionally attractive although some people will find him attractive. The kids just look like any other kids, they're not particularly 'good looking', but it doesn't matter. It's like people seem to think that they have got to push the narrative that they're good looking as it would be some sort of problem or weakness if they're not.

The kids are good looking though. Clearly you don’t agree with this, but I’m surprised you don’t see it because, to me, they genuinely are attractive. It wouldn’t be a problem or a weakness if they were not and I wouldn’t pretend they were good looking if they weren’t. It’s just a fact.

NoWayItWas · 22/07/2024 21:02

The kids are good looking though. Clearly you don’t agree with this, but I’m surprised you don’t see it because, to me, they genuinely are attractive. It wouldn’t be a problem or a weakness if they were not and I wouldn’t pretend they were good looking if they weren’t. It’s just a fact.

I don't agree that they're conventionally good looking children, no. My point is that it doesn't matter, it's not a pre requisite for who they are. I do think some people try to push that they're good looking and I just find it odd, more so because they're children. William is not a conventionally handsome man, but they still try to say he is. It doesn't matter that he isn't but it is very odd that people try to say he is.

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 22/07/2024 21:03

popthepopcorns · 22/07/2024 20:23

What's Harry got to do with George being attractive? Why the obsession with mentioning Harry on these threads? Surely he's irrelevant to RF discussions these days.

Just my assumption about the people who will come onto a RF thread about a child of the Wales's and say nasty things about his looks.

Spectre8 · 22/07/2024 22:05

popthepopcorns · 22/07/2024 20:23

What's Harry got to do with George being attractive? Why the obsession with mentioning Harry on these threads? Surely he's irrelevant to RF discussions these days.

Cos they don't like.him and any opportunity to say something negative....cos there was no reason to bring it up

PrincessMee · 22/07/2024 22:11

wordler · 22/07/2024 17:33

For those disapproving of the blazer - it seems to be Kate’s plan to vary the clothes, poses and backgrounds to get a bit of variety over the years. He was in a footy jersey for his sixth birthday. I remember loads of people complaining that was too casual.

So lovely!

popthepopcorns · 22/07/2024 22:12

William is very handsome and charismatic, especially in person. The children are all attractive, tall, and healthy-looking. Kate is obviously gorgeous. They are an attractive family.

popthepopcorns · 22/07/2024 22:13

Spectre8 · 22/07/2024 22:05

Cos they don't like.him and any opportunity to say something negative....cos there was no reason to bring it up

Ah, I see. Thanks.

DeftLemonDog · 24/07/2024 04:33

He’s a handsome kid. And he looks happy.

CoffeeCantata · 24/07/2024 06:11

Wickerchaize
The kids are good looking though. Clearly you don’t agree with this, but I’m surprised you don’t see it because, to me, they genuinely are attractive. It wouldn’t be a problem or a weakness if they were not and I wouldn’t pretend they were good looking if they weren’t. It’s just a fact.

I agree - they are very lucky children indeed. Beauty is subjective, but I think it would be very hard to argue that the 3 Wales children are not attractive.

I'm not comfortable with assessing people's 'beauty' - it seems to imply that they are more valuable than less-well-blessed individuals, but it's perverse to claim that George and his siblings are not good looking. William is good looking too - he's just lost his nice blond hair, and wisely chooses to keep what he has got very short indeed. I guess if you're a royal, whatever you do with your appearance will be criticised.

At least these children will not suffer the cruel jibes aimed at Charles and Anne when they were young people. Anne in particular was regularly compared to a horse, and Charles was mocked for his ears. People are horrible and there's no excuse, but maybe, whatever people criticise the Wales children for, it won't be their physical appearance.

sausawyee · 25/07/2024 09:39

Part of good looks is the personality that shines through - we've all seen photos of people who are technically good looking but are devoid of much more than that. I think the happiness and character of William and Kate's children shine through in their photos.

popthepopcorns · 25/07/2024 11:19

sausawyee · 25/07/2024 09:39

Part of good looks is the personality that shines through - we've all seen photos of people who are technically good looking but are devoid of much more than that. I think the happiness and character of William and Kate's children shine through in their photos.

Yes, I agree, especially Charlotte. She seems naturally charismatic.

halava · 25/07/2024 19:08

Whatever about not being obliged to do military training, and being able to have a career outside RF duties (for a while at least), I've often wondered what would happen if any of the Wales children came out as gay, or indeed trans.

I'm sure it would be no problem these days acceptance wise, but if it happened to be George where would we get the heir and spares from?

Please, please don't give me a hard time for this or call it distasteful. It could and does happen in many families.

spanieleyes · 25/07/2024 19:23

If George, for whatever reason, didn't have children, the next in line would be Charlotte and then her heirs. If she didn't have any, it would be Louis and then HIS heirs, after him it would go to Harry ( assuming he was still alive!) and his heirs!
Don't worry, they won't run out of heirs!

sausawyee · 25/07/2024 20:09

halava · 25/07/2024 19:08

Whatever about not being obliged to do military training, and being able to have a career outside RF duties (for a while at least), I've often wondered what would happen if any of the Wales children came out as gay, or indeed trans.

I'm sure it would be no problem these days acceptance wise, but if it happened to be George where would we get the heir and spares from?

Please, please don't give me a hard time for this or call it distasteful. It could and does happen in many families.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuccessiontootheBritishhthrone#:~:text=Succession%20to%20the%20British%20throne%20is%20determined%20by%20descent%2C%20sex,childless%20sovereign's%20nearest%20collateral%20line.

HTH

Whatapicture777 · 25/07/2024 20:20

halava · 25/07/2024 19:08

Whatever about not being obliged to do military training, and being able to have a career outside RF duties (for a while at least), I've often wondered what would happen if any of the Wales children came out as gay, or indeed trans.

I'm sure it would be no problem these days acceptance wise, but if it happened to be George where would we get the heir and spares from?

Please, please don't give me a hard time for this or call it distasteful. It could and does happen in many families.

Absolutely. There’s a large element of luck involved as to whether your personality, character or sexual preference matches with the requirements of the job.

For example, it suited the Queen well because she was very traditional and not a particularly reflective person, had a good work ethic and strong sense of duty, and got stuck in. Ditto Princess Anne.

But what the job requires of someone when they are not particularly suited to it, borders on psychological torture (George VI). He did a good job but it cost him dear.

This is one of the reasons why I think
we should ditch the lot. It’s almost a cruel position they are in, despite their riches.

For a child of eleven to have his life already mapped out for him in this day and age is mind blowing tbh and yet it’s treated like it’s perfectly normal.

And I imagine, with such intense scrutiny on them, is it virtually impossible to lead a life in the RF nowadays without being pretty honest about who you are (Andrew).

Let’s set them free and release them back in to the wilds of the grouse moors! 😀 At least an elected President can run for the role voluntarily.

And it would have the added benefit of avoiding the attractiveness or not of children being discussed on threads like this, and in much worse sm discussions, which is pretty distasteful if you think about it.

sausawyee · 25/07/2024 20:45

@Whatapicture777 that's a pretty poor excuse for posters writing disgusting things about children. They exist and are public figures so it's game on ? 🙄

Whatapicture777 · 26/07/2024 00:08

sausawyee · 25/07/2024 20:45

@Whatapicture777 that's a pretty poor excuse for posters writing disgusting things about children. They exist and are public figures so it's game on ? 🙄

What? I am saying the opposite that NO children should be subject to public scrutiny whether they are child actors, music prodigies, or members of the RF. Fame has horrible impacts on young minds and on children’s relationships.

By definition children can’t consent to any of this.

And that’s all bad enough in itself without having to grow up with a dawning awareness that there are Instagram accounts appearing about your clothes, film clips of you on You Tube where people are lip reading your conversations , articles written about you in tabloid newspapers and paparazzi lurking in shrubs and following you on bike rides.

It’s not what I would want for my dc.

sausawyee · 26/07/2024 00:32

Did you aye?

Whatapicture777 · 26/07/2024 05:22

sausawyee · 26/07/2024 00:32

Did you aye?

It's written down quite clearly yes.

Likewhatever · 26/07/2024 20:12

A royal heir being gay doesn’t mean they can’t have heirs. Although it would make things interesting.

KnickerlessParsons · 27/07/2024 10:41

Likewhatever · 26/07/2024 20:12

A royal heir being gay doesn’t mean they can’t have heirs. Although it would make things interesting.

Can gay people get married in church now?
I'd assume (though don't know) that an heir must be born from a legal marriage that is also recognised by the CofE as things currently stand (though that could also be changed in years to come).

pilates · 27/07/2024 13:03

Lovely picture and he is dressed how you would expect a royal to dress

sausawyee · 27/07/2024 13:04

Sweet @Whatapicture777 I'm glad you changed your post although we can still see it 😂

New posts on this thread. Refresh page