Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

King Charles III

578 replies

ConstantGarden1 · 01/07/2024 22:58

Will he?

I am no gambler but I can’t see it myself. Not unless he wants to show his support of his son. Would KC be that generous to his ‘darling boy’? If he did it will definitely upset some anti Harry royalists/daily mail readers/ right wing Americans. Can’t have Harry receiving the King surely….he is supposed to be beyond the pale these days.

William is reported as being ‘baffled’. Baffled? More like blazingly angry about it if true. I guess Will’s thought he could act like a ‘cuckoo’ and get Harry out now and forever. Maybe, the ‘bullying’ trait reported over the years by many, many people regarding him is still there.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/style/king-charles-discussions-visit-prince-130106673.html

King Charles 'in discussions' to visit Prince Harry for first time in years - as 'reason' behind trip revealed

King Charles is said to be in discussions to visit his estranged son Prince Harry in America for the first time in years - but his wife and Prince William are reportedly not happy

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/style/king-charles-discussions-visit-prince-130106673.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
GardeningIsntScrapingForSussex · 10/07/2024 15:16

There is no logic where there is complete and unadulterated pish.

Oprah made a pure show of herself. As did Meghan. As did Harry.

I say that humbly.

JSMill · 10/07/2024 15:16

SidekickSylvia · 10/07/2024 14:58

I'm trying to follow the logic of the conversation with Oprah regarding Meghan's harmful thoughts.

Her husband was a founder of 'Heads Together' mental health charity, with his own therapist on speed dial.

She had an outstanding medical team (including mental health for pre natal and post natal care) at her fingertips with Portland Hospital.

She had the royal family's medical team at her disposal.

Her mum was a social worker.

She's apparently intelligent, yet she bypassed all of those obvious resources and went to her staff's HR department; the department whose remit is to issue the gardener's contract/ her housekeeper's holiday allocation etc.. To discuss her mental health? It makes no sense whatsoever.

Then, finally, she blames her husband's family. It's all just such nonsense that I don't know how anyone can believe it. And Oprah just nods along with fake shock gasps, and doesn't question any of it. That whole interview was an embarrassment for all concerned.

The story just doesn't stand up to scrutiny and OW looked like a complete mug for just accepting it at face value. I can't bear Piers Morgan and he definitely has an unhealthy obsession with M. However, it was wrong that he lost his job for questioning M's suicide story. He is, after all, a journalist and it's the job of a responsible journalist to question and scrutinise.

PrincessMee · 10/07/2024 15:35

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 10/07/2024 08:51

It’s the Meghan dichotomy. She wants to pretend that she is a 19 year old ingenue innocent, entering the RF as innocent as Diana did (who really wasn’t), grappling with things she doesn’t understand and nobody will help her with, while at the same time claiming she’s a fully formed, strong feminist who can hit the ground running and teach the RF a thing or two about charity and philanthropy. She’s the humble girl whom she claims survived off $4 salad she was so poor, but she’s also the girl who definitely did not grow up in a poor area (and woe betide anyone suggests she did), grew up on film sets, and went to one of the best private schools in the state. She’s the humble girl who just wanted a kind man and didn’t care about his status, but wanted all the trappings of the status she married into straight away, otherwise she’s being slighted.

Harry is just a prick who is jealous of his brother, of course it didn’t occur to him that William and Catherine (and George) had also spent their early married years in less grand accommodation, let alone that it would not be forever. And clearly trying to impress/placate the humble girl who wanted nothing but kindness and didn’t care who he was.

Well said!

smilesy · 10/07/2024 18:59

Where it all starts to fall apart for me
is when the Princess of Wales get the blame for absolutely everything that went wrong for Meghan, from the bridesmaids dress saga, to the lip balm and shopping, to failing to get help for her mental health issues. Anyone would think she is jealous of the Princess

wordler · 10/07/2024 19:41

Baital · 06/07/2024 22:30

But she wouldn't have needed her passport/ driving licence / keys etc

She just needed to speak to her medical team

That was one of the phrases which got to me - it’s designed to make it seem like she was being held hostage. But it’s complete nonsense.

Passport - she did plenty of travel including private travel so had access to her passport - if someone was holding it for her it was most likely a staff member who was using it to sort out all her travel arrangements.

Drivers license - again I suspect a staffer was trying to get her US licence exchanged for a UK one - technically you are supposed to retest but I bet for VIPs there’s some sort of reciprocal arrangement.

Keys - what bloody keys did someone take off her - keys to what - she lived in a guarded palace, and owned no car of her own in the UK.

Also we’ve seen nearly every other royal zipping around all over the place driving themselves around London and around the country.

I believe she wanted to go to a specific VIP mental well-being type place - a celebrity or fashionable one - and was told it wasn’t possible for security reasons. But she had the option of bringing every possible type of mental health resource to her privately - as well as a PP pointed out all the resources of her expensive private maternity team.

smilesy · 10/07/2024 19:53

wordler · 10/07/2024 19:41

That was one of the phrases which got to me - it’s designed to make it seem like she was being held hostage. But it’s complete nonsense.

Passport - she did plenty of travel including private travel so had access to her passport - if someone was holding it for her it was most likely a staff member who was using it to sort out all her travel arrangements.

Drivers license - again I suspect a staffer was trying to get her US licence exchanged for a UK one - technically you are supposed to retest but I bet for VIPs there’s some sort of reciprocal arrangement.

Keys - what bloody keys did someone take off her - keys to what - she lived in a guarded palace, and owned no car of her own in the UK.

Also we’ve seen nearly every other royal zipping around all over the place driving themselves around London and around the country.

I believe she wanted to go to a specific VIP mental well-being type place - a celebrity or fashionable one - and was told it wasn’t possible for security reasons. But she had the option of bringing every possible type of mental health resource to her privately - as well as a PP pointed out all the resources of her expensive private maternity team.

What I also wonder is, what treatment did she actually receive in the end? Or was she just left to get over feeling so low she was suicidal on her own? Her maternity care can’t have been up to much then, even though it was at the Portland with highly regarded specialist maternal mental health care available as pp have said 🤔

hoteltango · 10/07/2024 20:16

smilesy · 10/07/2024 19:53

What I also wonder is, what treatment did she actually receive in the end? Or was she just left to get over feeling so low she was suicidal on her own? Her maternity care can’t have been up to much then, even though it was at the Portland with highly regarded specialist maternal mental health care available as pp have said 🤔

Harry wrote in Spare all about finding Meghan in tears and all that. But he doesn't say what help she got.

It's like a dangling plot hole...

Runnerinthenight · 10/07/2024 20:22

And within the month, she was well enough to jet to the US for her megabucks baby shower. Whatever help she got, it must have been powerful stuff!

smilesy · 10/07/2024 20:25

Runnerinthenight · 10/07/2024 20:22

And within the month, she was well enough to jet to the US for her megabucks baby shower. Whatever help she got, it must have been powerful stuff!

Not just within the month, within the week according to what was posted up thread 🤷‍♀️

typo

eta. Just realised it was the month, not the week. Doh 🤦‍♀️

Runnerinthenight · 10/07/2024 20:33

smilesy · 10/07/2024 20:25

Not just within the month, within the week according to what was posted up thread 🤷‍♀️

typo

eta. Just realised it was the month, not the week. Doh 🤦‍♀️

Edited

'Twas a miracle!

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 10/07/2024 21:03

hoteltango · 10/07/2024 20:16

Harry wrote in Spare all about finding Meghan in tears and all that. But he doesn't say what help she got.

It's like a dangling plot hole...

She got a $0.5m baby shower in New York hosted by her friends to cheer her up. This happened a few weeks after the Albert Hall event on the day she said she wanted to unalive herself and Harry did nothing and told her she had to go with him.

IsoldeWagner · 10/07/2024 22:14

It's so bad, it's embarrassing. Anyone with a smidgen of self awareness would realise this. The lies they tell! Offensive and ludicrous.

DeftLemonDog · 10/07/2024 22:47

The story just doesn't stand up to scrutiny and OW looked like a complete mug for just accepting it at face value. I can't bear Piers Morgan and he definitely has an unhealthy obsession with M. However, it was wrong that he lost his job for questioning M's suicide story. He is, after all, a journalist and it's the job of a responsible journalist to question and scrutinise.

I thought he lost his job when he stormed off set after being told by his co anchor to give his Meghan criticisms/obsession a rest.

DeftLemonDog · 10/07/2024 22:55

Here it is

Piers Morgan

IsoldeWagner · 11/07/2024 06:57

It hardly proves Meghan's claims.

SidekickSylvia · 11/07/2024 07:27

It's interesting that posters keen to defend Harry will jump on any digression from the thread title, in an attempt to take the thread on a derail. Somebody mentioned a presenter - so here's a link so that we may talk about that instead. I've just scrolled on another thread in this section, and there's even a picture of Jimmy Savile on the last few pages (I don't know why). Always lots of links to articles that have no relevance to the thread. Is it a tactic that's taught somewhere? Or is whataboutery the only tool that's left, in the very difficult job of justifying the Sussex grift?

IsoldeWagner · 11/07/2024 07:34

It's desperate, @SidekickSylvia . They can't defend his words and actions, so it's all about the derailing.

DeftLemonDog · 11/07/2024 07:35

Morgan threw a tantrum and stormed off set. He acted very unprofessionally.

Your post said he lost his job because he questioned Meghan being suicidal.

IsoldeWagner · 11/07/2024 07:38

Who is "you? I know what happened with Piers Morgan. I also know about the claims of Meghan Markle. The behaviour of the former does not validate the behaviour of the latter.

DeftLemonDog · 11/07/2024 07:44

Isolde Wagnerian is ‘you’ here.

Do you still stand by your post that Morgan lost his job because he questioned Meghan being suicidal. Or was it because he threw a tantrum and stormed off set?

IsoldeWagner · 11/07/2024 07:46

DeftLemonDog · 11/07/2024 07:44

Isolde Wagnerian is ‘you’ here.

Do you still stand by your post that Morgan lost his job because he questioned Meghan being suicidal. Or was it because he threw a tantrum and stormed off set?

I never raised the issue of Piers Morgan.
Check the posters, you.

DeftLemonDog · 11/07/2024 07:50

SidekickSylvia · 11/07/2024 07:27

It's interesting that posters keen to defend Harry will jump on any digression from the thread title, in an attempt to take the thread on a derail. Somebody mentioned a presenter - so here's a link so that we may talk about that instead. I've just scrolled on another thread in this section, and there's even a picture of Jimmy Savile on the last few pages (I don't know why). Always lots of links to articles that have no relevance to the thread. Is it a tactic that's taught somewhere? Or is whataboutery the only tool that's left, in the very difficult job of justifying the Sussex grift?

This thread is about Charles visiting Harry.

It was derailed many pages back, long before Meghan being suicidal was brought up on here (by a royal supporter btw).

DeftLemonDog · 11/07/2024 07:52

My apologies Isolde Wagner for mixing up posters.

MummyJ12 · 11/07/2024 07:53

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 10/07/2024 21:03

She got a $0.5m baby shower in New York hosted by her friends to cheer her up. This happened a few weeks after the Albert Hall event on the day she said she wanted to unalive herself and Harry did nothing and told her she had to go with him.

A disgraceful response from Harry. As I’ve said on here before. It’s ok not to be ok, but can you park it until after the Albert Hall and just be ok until then. 🙄

MummyJ12 · 11/07/2024 07:55

Runnerinthenight · 10/07/2024 20:22

And within the month, she was well enough to jet to the US for her megabucks baby shower. Whatever help she got, it must have been powerful stuff!

She did look very happy and positively glowing at the NY baby shower.

King Charles III
Swipe left for the next trending thread