Archewell report by Charity Watch

[BemusedAmerican]

It's tax time and Charity Watch is revising charity ratings. Archewell Foundation is now old enough to have a rating:
https://www.charitywatch.org/charity-donating-articles/archewell-foundation-charitywatch-rating

Here is info about Charity Watch for the curious: https://www.charitywatch.org/about-charitywatch/mission-goals

@AliceOlive I've never had the file late luxury. 😁

President?

Not only jumped the shark, you swam with it, wrestled it, invited it to home to meet your Nan and named your first baby after it.

Any self confessed Cromwell supporting republican who spouts such drivel as " my king Harry" has lost all credibility in my opinion!
It's like a turkey supporting paxo over homemade stuffing!

Not only jumped the shark, you swam with it, wrestled it, invited it to home to meet your Nan and named your first baby after it.

😂😂😁

This was gone over in detail already and died off. It’s a nothing burger.

Were you on that thread? It’s still open if you want me to bump it for you so as not to derail.

Someone wrote “My King Harry”? Oh, modern indeed!! As modern as touring Nigeria and inspecting the troops.

I have so many questions , None of them are regarding taxes or charities .
I know surf instructor , but who is the bodyguard ?

Kevin Costner @queenofarles !

No, Kevin Costner is not reputed to be a fan. Totally the opposite.

Sorry @BemusedAmerican , it was a joke as he starred in the bodyguard. 🤣

That is not 1 Corinthians 6:18

1 Corinthians 6:18
English Standard Version
18 Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin[a] a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body.

No mention of being put to death. Jesus of course stopped a crowd stoning a woman found in adultery saying “he who is without sin cast the first stone”

(I think your quote is Leviticus)

celebitchy,lipstick alley, and tattle life with a pinch of Reddit are your friends.

Thanks for the fact check I put in something like what did Jesus say about adultery and I seemed to get that. I probably said Bible so that would explain it.

Cry God for Harry, England, and Saint George! Harry is a great English name whereas William was imported into Royal venacular from the dastardly 'racist' Dutch and King Billy is a hero to the Orangemen of Northern Ireland.

I know this was a couple of months ago, but stylist to the stars ( currently Bianca Censori) really made me laugh! Nice work 😆

I don’t agree with mocking people’s names. YMMV.

I'm William the Conqueror, my enemies stood no chance. they call me the first English king. Although I come from France. 1066 the Domesday book I gave to history.

Fact checked by Horrible Histories. Must burn.

Oops conceded.

Good for you. I don't agree with everybody either and that's good for me. That said I think the Royal Family have broad shoulders well they have to have we live in a free country made free by the struggles of the masses not given to us from high by our own rulers.

The British Royal Family's public stance on the Suffragette movement was complex and varied depending on the individual and the specific time period.

General Attitude:

Overall, the Royal Family maintained a cautious and somewhat conservative approach to the Suffragettes. They were concerned about the potential disruption to social order and the monarchy's position. Publicly, they rarely expressed explicit support or opposition.

Specific Figures:

Queen Victoria: She was firmly against women's suffrage and considered it a threat to the traditional roles of women.
King Edward VII: He was more open to considering women's suffrage but did not actively advocate for it.
King George V: He initially opposed women's suffrage but later softened his stance, recognizing the contributions of women during World War I.
Queen Mary: While not a vocal supporter, she reportedly had private sympathies for the Suffragettes and even met with some of their leaders.
Princess Louise, Duchess of Argyll: She was the most outspoken supporter of women's suffrage within the Royal Family, attending rallies and signing petitions.

Sorry I'm not seeing the relevance of the past royal family's opinion of the suffragette movement to this thread at all !

I think someone likes Google. This is a scatter gun attack to distract us from the real issue, quite a desperate one.

So back to the point. Who did they get to ring Newsome? I’m sticking to Oprah. I’ve always thought they were paid for that interview.

I quite agree @Ratsoffasinkingsauage

I think it’s really not on to keep posting AI generated, nonsensical non sequiturs. It’s not in the spirit and derailing.

Also nowhere near the point of this thread, I wish Queen Vic had been right about suffrage threatening the traditional roles of women! The sly patriarchy pulled a sneaky trick there, ensuring that votes and equal pay wouldn't spare women the responsibilities of home and children 😒