Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
5
HornMeister · 12/03/2024 09:51

@GoodOldEmmaNess but if you went to the school gates of Lambrook or any other private school in the home counties you would see many women of Kate's age wearing practically the same!
It's the casual dresses down uniform of upper class mums!

OP posts:
Worstyearyet · 12/03/2024 09:55

Interesting, it definitely feels as though there is more going on behind the scenes. Like others I heard about the rumours of an affair between PoW & Rose Hanbury but I thought they’d been widely discredited.

maudelovesharold · 12/03/2024 11:08

And it is his son who is the Earl of Rocksavage, according to the Indie article (presumably on account of making it out of the womb seconds before his twin bro?).

That would make a good AIBU from the younger untitled twin!

Sunflowerfieldsinsummer · 12/03/2024 11:13

How do you justify spreading nasty unfounded rumours about people you have literally never met? You have reduced yourselves to the intellectual level of Russian bots on X…

If any of the posters spreading this nonsense have happy, successful lives and good careers I will eat my hat… this sort of bitterness must be deep-seated.

Puddlelane123 · 12/03/2024 11:19

I do not think this rumour has legs - wasn’t it started by Giles Coren? Likewise I find it hard to believe that Pippa would name her daughter after the woman shagging her sister’s husband?

eise · 12/03/2024 16:28

It's Telegraph, Independent and Tatler although apparently Tatler has deleted. Screenshots are still online.

VictorianChic · 12/03/2024 17:18

I can completely understand why she’d want a side piece, being married to old Chumley, who depending on the source is either a homosexual or a groomer of a teenager (the latter is gross)

But the future king as your affair partner? That’s too hot to handle surely. There will be plenty of youngish aristo men out there for her, looking for extramarital stuff. Why involve oneself with such a potentially toxic situation? The opprobrium, the scrutiny, the negative impact on her minor children when it all comes out.

Camilla was different because they’d been in a relationship before and had never fallen out of love. But to enter into a scratch relationship with a married senior royal … that’s pretty crazy.

CoffeeCantata · 12/03/2024 17:36

MummyJ36 · Yesterday 22:27

Oooh I’ve been on this one for ages! Always amuses me how shocked my friends and family are when I mentioned this well known affair. And to be fair, I believe it is well known in lots of circles. I do have a feeling she is firmly a mistress though. Royals have had mistresses since the dawn of time. I think what seriously muddied the waters was that she was actually good friends with Kate before it all came out.

Ooh yes. Isn't it lip-smackingly thrilling to drool over a lovely piece of gossip, especially when the woman concerned has been seriously ill and there are three young children involved?

Great fun!

Well, tough luck. This was all based on some rubbish made up by Giles Coren, the horrible toad, so you may be disappointed. To quote a MN cliche...'You sound lovely..."

User14March · 12/03/2024 17:45

VictorianChic · 12/03/2024 17:18

I can completely understand why she’d want a side piece, being married to old Chumley, who depending on the source is either a homosexual or a groomer of a teenager (the latter is gross)

But the future king as your affair partner? That’s too hot to handle surely. There will be plenty of youngish aristo men out there for her, looking for extramarital stuff. Why involve oneself with such a potentially toxic situation? The opprobrium, the scrutiny, the negative impact on her minor children when it all comes out.

Camilla was different because they’d been in a relationship before and had never fallen out of love. But to enter into a scratch relationship with a married senior royal … that’s pretty crazy.

You’re barking up wrong tree, someone (potentially) nails it upthread, (although close). No one would have thought it of Mountbatten, either, possibly. Altho’ poss all of it rot.

Parsley1234 · 12/03/2024 18:09

Yes not Rose her husband 🤦‍♀️heard from a reliable source

Serenster · 12/03/2024 18:35

ZellyFitzgerald · 11/03/2024 22:17

I previously read that if newspapers can't report on a particular story that they put out a seemingly unconnected story instead, which actually does have significance but isn't exactly against the rules to publish.

There's definitely something going on if the papers are writing about Rose out of the blue.

They're trying to say something without actually 'saying it'.

Or, they know from past experience that a lot of people will be googling “Who is Rose ?” because, with William being in the news the pro-Sussex brigade will be picking up their efforts to get her name splashed across social media (as they often do).

If people are going to google her, may as well be the Independent site with a recent article about her that they land on…thinks the Independent. Tactics to drive clicks, in other words.

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 12/03/2024 20:02

VictorianChic · 12/03/2024 17:18

I can completely understand why she’d want a side piece, being married to old Chumley, who depending on the source is either a homosexual or a groomer of a teenager (the latter is gross)

But the future king as your affair partner? That’s too hot to handle surely. There will be plenty of youngish aristo men out there for her, looking for extramarital stuff. Why involve oneself with such a potentially toxic situation? The opprobrium, the scrutiny, the negative impact on her minor children when it all comes out.

Camilla was different because they’d been in a relationship before and had never fallen out of love. But to enter into a scratch relationship with a married senior royal … that’s pretty crazy.

Tbh if you look at it with pure logic William wouldn’t be such a terrible choice if she wants to ensure her affair partner never wants more.

She has a title, grand house and good lifestyle. To make sure the affair partner never blabs or decides that he’s caught the feels and wants more her safest bet is someone who has more to lose, but who is in her social set so there’s easy explanations if they’re seen together.

William both has more to lose and access to high security places to meet. Her husbands family is also entwined with royals by the Lord Great Chamberlain role so she could never be completely cut out of their social circle if an affair ended.

i don’t think they did have an affair, but if you were in her position he wouldn’t be a shit choice logically.

HornMeister · 12/03/2024 21:43

Parsley1234 · 12/03/2024 18:09

Yes not Rose her husband 🤦‍♀️heard from a reliable source

Omg this rumour is still doing the rounds! Is this where the "prince of pegging" springs from?

OP posts:
LuluBlakey1 · 12/03/2024 21:52

Absolutely not a 'by chance' article. The quality of the content in The Independent has slumped in the last 3 or 4 years. I used to really like it.

As an aside- that's a very odd photo of Sarah Vine, her neck has completely disappeared and her head is on her chest.

Parsley1234 · 12/03/2024 21:52

@HornMeister looks that way

User14March · 12/03/2024 21:58

@HornMeister No.

User14March · 12/03/2024 22:01

Aristos, Royals, I don’t mean PW, are notoriously louche, look at Mountbatten/‘White Mischief’, etc.

LuluBlakey1 · 12/03/2024 22:03

Clarebelle878 · 11/03/2024 22:24

What do others think of this from a normally sympathetic paper?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13184915/Kate-Mothers-Day-photo-PR-nightmare-Palace.html

This jumped out at me:

’But it is vital, if the public and media are to have confidence in the story the Waleses are publicly telling about their lives, that their images are true and authentic.’

The Mail is not a 'normally sympathetic paper' to the RF. They undermine them constantly, snipe at them, make up ludicrous stories daily that counteract the previous day's 'exclusive', but are, of course, not below producing sycophantic articles with hundreds of photos, particularly of Kate and the children, to sell papers on big occasions.

HornMeister · 12/03/2024 22:05

User14March · 12/03/2024 21:58

@HornMeister No.

Where did it come from so?

OP posts:
WhatAreThey · 12/03/2024 22:20

Rose is trying to say she's happily married in a large house living life. If anything happens she had nothing to do with it. If Willy flies a chopper down ever so often it's on him.

Clarebelle878 · 13/03/2024 06:55

LuluBlakey1 · 12/03/2024 22:03

The Mail is not a 'normally sympathetic paper' to the RF. They undermine them constantly, snipe at them, make up ludicrous stories daily that counteract the previous day's 'exclusive', but are, of course, not below producing sycophantic articles with hundreds of photos, particularly of Kate and the children, to sell papers on big occasions.

perhaps it’s a matter of perspective. I’ve never seen anything in the mail that could be considered republican, or that looks too closely at royal finances in the way the guardian might. I agree they publish quite sycophantic articles.

medianewbie · 13/03/2024 09:48

HornMeister · 11/03/2024 22:28

My word, is that to do with the pegging?

Now THAT would be difficult to 'explain' to the public given PW family image!

HornMeister · 13/03/2024 10:46

medianewbie · 13/03/2024 09:48

Now THAT would be difficult to 'explain' to the public given PW family image!

It honestly was really doing the rounds a couple of years ago! Prince of Pegging! I'm not imagining it 😊

OP posts:
Nono22972 · 13/03/2024 12:52

Stephen Colbert talking about the Rose-William rumour even implying that William is the father of her child. To imply that on National TV, he better have credible sources other than Twitter otherwise he should totally get sued

https://twitter.com/MandieBrowne/status/1767770502431482201?t=5CELywPX_2RKMOhDyLj40g&s=08

https://twitter.com/MandieBrowne/status/1767770502431482201?s=08&t=5CELywPX_2RKMOhDyLj40g

GreenClock · 13/03/2024 13:09

Surely if Rose wanted a third child but couldn’t/wouldn’t be impregnated by old Chumley, she wouldn’t choose PW to be the father. And why would he agree to it?

That rumour seems far fetched, and hurtful to the adults and the child involved. And I’m no defender of the royals or the aristocracy by any means.