Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

George's exams

918 replies

everetting · 02/10/2023 14:52

Kate is not going with william to Singapore as George has important exams. What exams would a 10 year old be sitting in November?
I know nothing about private school systems so hoping someone here does.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
everetting · 06/10/2023 14:23

Yes true, no one is irrelevant.
But if people were interested in the Royal family, then they would not keep talking about Harry and meghan whenever Kate and William were brought up.

OP posts:
Daisyislazy · 06/10/2023 14:24

They have ALL benefited from their royal connections

oaktreeswing · 06/10/2023 14:25

It's funny. Earlier OP was complaining that she couldn't start a character assasination thread about Kate and William without people talking about Meghan and Harry. Now she's dragged Mike Tindall kicking and screaming into her own thread... to illustrate what exactly?

A reminder: Zara and Mike are private individuals. They don't have titles. They don't badmouth their relatives in exchange for money. They get along with everyone. Their children are visible (sometimes photographed at events like the horse trials) but otherwise left alone. They have both been top of class succesful at their chosen careers, are widely respected and very popular.

Roussette · 06/10/2023 14:26

That's your take on it oaktree

Mine's a little different.

CoughingMajoress · 06/10/2023 14:26

The idea that press attention and public interest correlates or should correlate to "position in some old British formal order" is pretty weird if you think about it.

Most people don't care about shit like that, it's just a small number of older British royal fans who put weight into these things. Yeah of course order of succession is important to the royals, but outside of the monarch the general public mainly don't know or cares anything about this arcane rank and style stuff.

It's like all the posters saying Harry should be stripped off his title and that way the press and public would lose interest. In reality if Harry was stripped of his title no one would notice or care at all and everyone would still call him Prince Harry, the way the world always called his mum Princess Di when she never even held or could legally hold that title.

Because that's just not how the world works. Look at any celeb industry, tons of aspiring actors with impeccable training and on-paper qualifications never get the tiniest bit of attention, whereas people who have never attended an acting class in their life become superstars. Reality contestants who don't do anything become household names, just because they're attractive and charismatic. It really doesn't matter at all what "qualifications" someone has on paper to be famous, the only real qualification to be famous is the general public finding something about you fascinating.

In the real world, the level of media attention a person receives depends mostly on their personal charisma, their level of physical attractiveness, and their ability to generate gossip. H&M are very charismatic and clearly the general public are fascinated by them (if they weren't, the media wouldn't print a billion stories about them). Kate is beautiful and wears lovely clothes but she's not very interesting or charismatic, and both Charles and William are dull as ditchwater and just don't capture the public imagination or create fascination. That's why they trot the kids out all the time, because they're not interesting enough to the wider general public to generate that much positive attention by themselves.

oaktreeswing · 06/10/2023 14:27

But if people were interested in the Royal family, then they would not keep talking about Harry and meghan whenever Kate and William were brought up.

People are likely to bring H&M up if you accuse Kate and William of things which, in fact, only Harry and Meghan are guilty of. It's not rocket science.

everetting · 06/10/2023 14:28

Oaktresswing stop making up things about me. It is a very unpleasant character trait.

OP posts:
Howsimplywonderful · 06/10/2023 14:29

@oaktreeswing

i just bring them up for comparison purposes.
Meghan and Harry have compared themselves and their parenting to William and Kate’s in interviews too.

Roussette · 06/10/2023 14:30

I am not sure what is made up on here about K&W. There are opinions, yes. There are thoughts on them. But what is made up?

It's very easy for a reborn poster to jump in with accusations like this.

Daisyislazy · 06/10/2023 14:31

I know who I would rather go on a night out with and it's not K and W, I think they will really struggle when they take over. I'm sure they are nice enough people but they do appear a tad dull

derxa · 06/10/2023 14:31

Charles and William are dull as ditchwater Personally I'm a fan of dull as ditchwater

everetting · 06/10/2023 14:31

CoughingMajoress · 06/10/2023 14:26

The idea that press attention and public interest correlates or should correlate to "position in some old British formal order" is pretty weird if you think about it.

Most people don't care about shit like that, it's just a small number of older British royal fans who put weight into these things. Yeah of course order of succession is important to the royals, but outside of the monarch the general public mainly don't know or cares anything about this arcane rank and style stuff.

It's like all the posters saying Harry should be stripped off his title and that way the press and public would lose interest. In reality if Harry was stripped of his title no one would notice or care at all and everyone would still call him Prince Harry, the way the world always called his mum Princess Di when she never even held or could legally hold that title.

Because that's just not how the world works. Look at any celeb industry, tons of aspiring actors with impeccable training and on-paper qualifications never get the tiniest bit of attention, whereas people who have never attended an acting class in their life become superstars. Reality contestants who don't do anything become household names, just because they're attractive and charismatic. It really doesn't matter at all what "qualifications" someone has on paper to be famous, the only real qualification to be famous is the general public finding something about you fascinating.

In the real world, the level of media attention a person receives depends mostly on their personal charisma, their level of physical attractiveness, and their ability to generate gossip. H&M are very charismatic and clearly the general public are fascinated by them (if they weren't, the media wouldn't print a billion stories about them). Kate is beautiful and wears lovely clothes but she's not very interesting or charismatic, and both Charles and William are dull as ditchwater and just don't capture the public imagination or create fascination. That's why they trot the kids out all the time, because they're not interesting enough to the wider general public to generate that much positive attention by themselves.

I think this is a good post. You are right that few really care about titles. Process Di was a princess to the public all her life even though her title had been removed.
Charisma is a funny thing. You either have it or you don't, and it does draw people in.

OP posts:
Roussette · 06/10/2023 14:33

i just bring them up for comparison purposes.

That is hilarious! It's all for research purposes then! Nothing to do with not liking them!
How can you compare a couple who are working and taxpayer funded members of the RF. And a couple who are not?

oaktreeswing · 06/10/2023 14:33

In the real world, the level of media attention a person receives depends mostly on their personal charisma, their level of physical attractiveness, and their ability to generate gossip. H&M are very charismatic and clearly the general public are fascinated by them (if they weren't, the media wouldn't print a billion stories about them). Kate is beautiful and wears lovely clothes but she's not very interesting or charismatic, and both Charles and William are dull as ditchwater and just don't capture the public imagination or create fascination. That's why they trot the kids out all the time, because they're not interesting enough to the wider general public to generate that much positive attention by themselves.

A fascinating theory! There's just the awkward matter of the popularity polls to explain away...

I'd say Harry and Meghan attract interest in the same way that his Great-uncle Edward and Mrs Simpson attracted interest. Hint: it wasn't becaise they were 'charismatic'.

EdithWeston · 06/10/2023 14:34

Roussette · 06/10/2023 14:10

Yes. They both do not do duties for the RF, two happen to have a title, two happen to not.
But Zara and Mike would not be able to live they life they do without their royal connections.

Not so sure about that

Mike was much capped England captain - and looking at his activities they’re not dissimilar to what other high profile international have done

Zara was World Champion, and again a move into brand ambassador for related outdoorsy stuff and sponsors of equestrian events is a well-trodden path (look at eg Richard Meade or Lucinda Prior-Palmer

everetting · 06/10/2023 14:34

Just to add, I think Harry would have been stripped of his title if it wasn't for Andrew.

OP posts:
CoughingMajoress · 06/10/2023 14:35

oaktreeswing · 06/10/2023 14:25

It's funny. Earlier OP was complaining that she couldn't start a character assasination thread about Kate and William without people talking about Meghan and Harry. Now she's dragged Mike Tindall kicking and screaming into her own thread... to illustrate what exactly?

A reminder: Zara and Mike are private individuals. They don't have titles. They don't badmouth their relatives in exchange for money. They get along with everyone. Their children are visible (sometimes photographed at events like the horse trials) but otherwise left alone. They have both been top of class succesful at their chosen careers, are widely respected and very popular.

Zara and Mike live in a royal residence, so they are directly financially profiting from being royals. Zara certainly wouldn't have all these deals and endorsements if she wasn't a royal.

Zara does royal events and has attended events posing on the Buckingham Palace balcony, which all boost her fame and establish her in the eyes of the general public as a Royal. The fact she doesn't have a title and doesn't hold the official status of Working Royal is irrelevant, since the average person doesn't care or even know about that. She's basically enjoying the same "half in half out" situation the Firm claimed Harry and Meghan couldn't have, in that Zara can use her royal status and regular attendance at royal events to boost her own fame, yet also financially profit from being able to commercialise her royal status.

They both exploit their royal connections like mad to grab more fame and money for themselves, and a lot of Mike's comments about other royals have been very gossipy and trashy and indiscreet, and he's trashed other royals before.

Howsimplywonderful · 06/10/2023 14:35

@Roussette

They like to compare themselves
If you had copied the whole post that would have been super clear.

never mind 😀

everetting · 06/10/2023 14:36

Edithwrston I have never heard of those other horse people you name. Zara is known because she is a royal.
Mike may still have done fine without the Royal connection, but it will certainly help him.

OP posts:
Howsimplywonderful · 06/10/2023 14:36

Donald Trump generates headlines but do you want him in a serious role - most definitely no

Ditto Meghan and Kate

they are not serious people

Roussette · 06/10/2023 14:37

everetting · 06/10/2023 14:31

I think this is a good post. You are right that few really care about titles. Process Di was a princess to the public all her life even though her title had been removed.
Charisma is a funny thing. You either have it or you don't, and it does draw people in.

I agree. It really is the 'X' factor and whether you have it or not. That works in all walks of life. Those that inspire. Those that get to the top of their tree from nothing. Those that give motivational talks that actually mean something to people. Charisma and that extra.

That's why I feel a tad sorry for the likes of Edward and Sophie. Nice looking couple, do a lot for the RF showing up, doing their bit.... but they can go on a royal tour and the media basically ignore them. Really quite unfair if you look at it.

That's another reason I have a problem with the Monarchy. It's like a popularity contest.

themessygarden · 06/10/2023 14:38

everetting · 06/10/2023 13:55

I agree Harry should be irrelevant. And yet people can't stop talking about him and meghan. Look at any article about Kate or William and there will be lots of comments about Harry and meghan.

I think the exact same can be said about articles or threads on here about H&M, there will be lots of comments about Andrew & Fergie, using them as some sort of benchmark.

derxa · 06/10/2023 14:39

That's another reason I have a problem with the Monarchy. It's like a popularity contest. It's not.

oaktreeswing · 06/10/2023 14:40

I agree. It really is the 'X' factor and whether you have it or not. That works in all walks of life. Those that inspire. Those that get to the top of their tree from nothing. Those that give motivational talks that actually mean something to people. Charisma and that extra.

Yes, that's exactly what Kate has. You can see it in the coverage of the rugby event yesterday. She really makes an impact on people.

derxa · 06/10/2023 14:41

I have never heard of those other horse people you name. You must be much younger than me.

Swipe left for the next trending thread