Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Original poster

Harry loses HRH title

497 replies

cobicat · 09/08/2023 05:36

Harry's 'HRH' has reportedly been removed from his listing on the RF website. Seems about time, really? Odd that Meghan's wasn't removed too, perhaps an oversight? Or are they making the changes gradually in the hope that no-one will notice...

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
jeffgoldblum · 15/08/2023 10:29

I personally think Harry is to blame for almost all of these things , and I don't really care what Meghan wears or goes and if she phoned the paps? , who cares , she was an actress after all , which means she wanted to be famous.
Obviously you can't be famous if people don't see you out and about !

Gilmorehill · 15/08/2023 11:09

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 10:00

There are many credible examples of MM courting publicity. ie; She set up paparazzi to photograph one of her early dates with Harry in London. Also photos of her out grocery shopping.

She also tipped them off to the location of Tyler Perry’s house.

They filmed so many private interactions to use on the Netflix mockumentary. Videos of themselves upset.

There are photos of them from the time of the Queen’s funeral during a period of a media blackout that were obviously set up.

Also, Omid Scobie tweeting their plans to travel to Scotland, then backtracking when they changed plans. Had to come from them, among other things he has shared.

Details about Lilibet’s birthday party “leaked” or whatever you want to call sharing your private family events with the press.

I wouldn’t criticize or question it if I was a supporter. They can do as they wish.
They have a right to generate publicity and craft an image of themselves. It just doesn’t seem genuine and there will be suspicion every time she is photographed now.

Did Omid Scobie really tweet about their travel plans to Balmoral? I wasn't really paying attention to what they were up to on the day HMQ died.

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 11:13

Yes, he said they were on the way there. Then he retracted after it was decided that only Harry would go. It was quite a spectacle.

ILikeDinosaurs · 15/08/2023 11:39

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 10:13

I am stating a simple fact. If you repeatedly get caught doing a thing then people are often going to wonder if you are doing that thing again.

Like the story of the little boy the cried wolf. Only this is the story of the woman that called the paparazzi.

Show quote history

"Suspicion", "get caught" - has she committed a crime? Why so much suspicion of her every single move or motivation? Because she criticised the royal family? Is that IT? Criticising the royal family somehow makes her some unethical, attention seeking criminal who deserves "suspicion" and to "get caught". Because the RF are high and holy and above it all, are they?

This kind of language is disgusting. How about you people put your hours and hours and hours of super sleuthing to real use, like investigating Hollywood child abuse or some such - plenty of stories in the rags about it - rather this cutting down of a woman just living her life.

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 11:43

Interesting use of the term “disgusting”.

No, I don’t think being caught engaging in attention seeking behaving is criminal. But people will indeed suspect once once you’ve done so repeatedly.

Viviennemary · 15/08/2023 11:46

No it she does have grievances against a lot of people. Her Dad, her sister now the royals. Makes you wonder about who is to blame, and only one relative invited to her wedding, not one uncle aunt or cousin.

Samcro · 15/08/2023 11:54

can you blame her for not inviting her family????????

Morestrangerthings1 · 15/08/2023 11:56

polkadotdalmation · 15/08/2023 10:15

Exactly. Nothing wrong with it, she can do whatever she wishes. It's just the hypocrisy of saying the paparazzi were making their lives unbearable, they needed to escape to Canada to find privacy, and the paparazzi following them everywhere meant they needed high level security paid for by the British (or American) taxpayer.

Show quote history

It’s not that they felt they needed security from the paparazzi, it was for security from threatening people. People have gone to prison for threatening the lives of Harry Meghan and Archie.

If it was me fearing attacks from these sorts of people, I’d be wondering who are legitimate ‘paps ’ and who aren’t.

I posted on another thread about Kate being apparently without security for 5 years before marrying William. William finally insisted on security I was told. But for 5 years Kate experienced episodes of paps harassing her dreadfully - calling her slut etc, to get her to turn around. That’s bad enough, but how was Kate to know who were legitimate paps and who were crazy people with cameras.

The idea that somehow, magically Meghan didn’t experience any of this pre marriage does not make any sense. All the married ins before marriage, and many many girlfriends experienced this.

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 11:58

I absolutely do not. Her sister is a train wreck and what her father has done since the wedding would make it important to trust him.

When you can’t trust one of your parents it can color everything. (No idea if it does for her, but it’s very sad that her father chose to go on talk shows and say ugly things.)

ILikeDinosaurs · 15/08/2023 11:59

Viviennemary · 15/08/2023 11:46

No it she does have grievances against a lot of people. Her Dad, her sister now the royals. Makes you wonder about who is to blame, and only one relative invited to her wedding, not one uncle aunt or cousin.

Her dad admitted he was trying to ruin the wedding. He said he would continue to hound her - for money - until she complied and gave him "access" to her kids. Lovely Dad.

Her sister spewed and continues to spew poisonous venom about her as soon as she got engaged - for money - out of pure unhinged jealousy. Who does that. Her own kids hate her, what does that tell you.

Her brother - have you see his youtube channel? I can't even think of bad enough words to describe it. I think he is a deranged monster. And he makes money out of shitting on his sister and making disgusting racist remarks.

All of them for money, for money, for money.

And yet you people all think she's the bad one? Would you stay in touch with relatives who did this to you?

polkadotdalmation · 15/08/2023 12:06

Samcro · 15/08/2023 11:54

can you blame her for not inviting her family????????

No most of them are bloody awful although I feel sorry for her dad as they had a close relationship before harry came along. I can't understand how things went so wrong he's never met harry or the grandkids. As for the brother. I saw a few minutes on you tube and he is deranged

Iwantcakeeveryday · 15/08/2023 12:49

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 10:13

I am stating a simple fact. If you repeatedly get caught doing a thing then people are often going to wonder if you are doing that thing again.

Like the story of the little boy the cried wolf. Only this is the story of the woman that called the paparazzi.

Show quote history

You're not stating facts, you're stating what you think the facts are based on reports. You have absolutely zero proof of any of it.

Iwantcakeeveryday · 15/08/2023 12:50

Viviennemary · 15/08/2023 11:46

No it she does have grievances against a lot of people. Her Dad, her sister now the royals. Makes you wonder about who is to blame, and only one relative invited to her wedding, not one uncle aunt or cousin.

So once again people are using her disgusting father who tried to blackmail her and her racist revolting half siblings she barely knows as examples of her being a bad person.

Ninaplant · 15/08/2023 12:50

The bullying, the hateful double standards, wild speculations, blatant lies, denigration and dehumanisation of a single woman with a history of suicidal ideation continues on these threads.

This has been going on for far too long (years) with very little pushback!

There are plenty of mothers on this board who identify with Meghan and can relate to some of her experiences - how some of the more malicious, insensitive and cruel posters fail to recognise the impact of their words is mind boggling.

The unprecedented levels of scrutiny and singling out of Meghan is triggering, especially to vulnerable mothers who have experienced suicidal thoughts whilst pregnant, post natal depression, abusive treatment during postpartum recovery, loneliness, abandonment and difficult relatives.

Mumsnet have allowed the othering of Meghan to thrive on their site and there is a real human cost to the targeted harassment - not just to Meghan.

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 12:53

If a something is triggering to me I step away from it.

ILikeDinosaurs · 15/08/2023 12:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Novella4 · 15/08/2023 13:00

I haven’t RTFT but I do think it is an interesting object lesson if Harry’s ‘HRH’ is removed.

It really illustrates how utterly meaningless these so called ‘titles’ and ‘honours’ are .
Just like the chocolate medals they award themselves - the Americans call it ‘stolen valour’

Harry will continue doing what he does regardless .
And the more he thrives , it more it highlights the shallow facade of this ‘royal’ family, held in place by MSM ( that will change ).

ILikeDinosaurs · 15/08/2023 13:01

Ninaplant · 15/08/2023 12:50

The bullying, the hateful double standards, wild speculations, blatant lies, denigration and dehumanisation of a single woman with a history of suicidal ideation continues on these threads.

This has been going on for far too long (years) with very little pushback!

There are plenty of mothers on this board who identify with Meghan and can relate to some of her experiences - how some of the more malicious, insensitive and cruel posters fail to recognise the impact of their words is mind boggling.

The unprecedented levels of scrutiny and singling out of Meghan is triggering, especially to vulnerable mothers who have experienced suicidal thoughts whilst pregnant, post natal depression, abusive treatment during postpartum recovery, loneliness, abandonment and difficult relatives.

Mumsnet have allowed the othering of Meghan to thrive on their site and there is a real human cost to the targeted harassment - not just to Meghan.

Well said 👏👏

Hard to believe some of these are mothers too.

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 13:02

Iwantcakeeveryday · 15/08/2023 12:49

You're not stating facts, you're stating what you think the facts are based on reports. You have absolutely zero proof of any of it.

Show quote history

It is a fact that Meghan provided a letter to her friends to share with People magazine. Then sued over the same letter.

Also that she and Harry provided information to given to Omid Scobie for Finding Freedom. A fact that she admitted this after previously saying she had not done so.

Also apparently proven that she provided paparazzi with the location of Tyler Perry’s home.

Someone told LaineyGossip that Kate didn’t take her shopping. Do you think it was Kate that shared this?

Many of the other points I posted previously as examples of attention seeking behavior have credible sources.

Iwantcakeeveryday · 15/08/2023 13:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 13:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

.

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 13:08

Novella4 · 15/08/2023 13:00

I haven’t RTFT but I do think it is an interesting object lesson if Harry’s ‘HRH’ is removed.

It really illustrates how utterly meaningless these so called ‘titles’ and ‘honours’ are .
Just like the chocolate medals they award themselves - the Americans call it ‘stolen valour’

Harry will continue doing what he does regardless .
And the more he thrives , it more it highlights the shallow facade of this ‘royal’ family, held in place by MSM ( that will change ).

Legit question: Are Harry and Meghan no longer part of the Royal Family in your eyes?

Novella4 · 15/08/2023 13:17

@AliceOlive
legit answer :

NO-ONE is part of a ‘ royal’ family .

’royalty ‘ is an invention . It’s a lie that some choose to believe .

LadyVictoriaSponge · 15/08/2023 13:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Are we allowed now to call each other disparaging names now if we don’t agree? I thought that all this cap doffers/haterz/Stans/Sugars had stopped?

AliceOlive · 15/08/2023 13:22

Novella4 · 15/08/2023 13:17

@AliceOlive
legit answer :

NO-ONE is part of a ‘ royal’ family .

’royalty ‘ is an invention . It’s a lie that some choose to believe .

Legit not understanding. When you write about the “Royal” family you don’t include them?