Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

The markel family interview

853 replies

IamSuperTired · 30/04/2023 14:39

Anyone know how/where I can watch it? :) I think it's on today ....

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:16

Where has anyone said no other countries are racist?

skullbabe · 01/05/2023 11:18

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 10:52

There are racist elements in this country . We've just had a review of the met police who were found to be institutionally racist and misogynistic. The Sussexes received death threats from far right groups.Jim Davidson is still doing shows and he is racist.

I know people with racist views in my own family. Netflix raised a good point.

But Meghan did not say the whole country is racist, that is a lie and yet you complained that Meghan has a problem with the truth.

I think this is the thing that confuses me - it’s as if people don’t believe that this country has a very real problem with racism. It’s like people ignore all of the reports that come from all sectors which point to it but heaven forbid H&M mention it.

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:18

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:15

Well, democracy is majority rule.

I don't support the current UK government on any number of issues and didn't vote for them.

Unless you are saying that your vote should count more than that of other citizens?

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:20

Yes, racism is a problem in the UK. And in the USA - where they have chosen to live to 'escape' the racism.

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:22

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:18

Unless you are saying that your vote should count more than that of other citizens?

But its a majority because the maouris were slaughtered? The whites are the majity due to genocide.

Whaeanui · 01/05/2023 11:23

Well, democracy is majority rule.

Is colonisation democratic? How easy it is of you to just dismiss the fact indigenous people are outnumbered on their own lands by their colonisers. You’ll never understand what that feels like and quite clearly, you don’t care.

NurseCranesRolodex · 01/05/2023 11:24

This lot are a bunch of tasteless, bottom feeding scumbags. They weren't part of M's upbringing. I've got "step relatives" I've not seen in 20 years, the thought of them commenting on my life on camera would be awful. I've never known them. I'm not huge H & M fans, particularly but nobody deserves this. I suspect this aspect of M's family are the real reason there was so much effort to dissuade the marriage going ahead. The RF knew all about this wing, of course.

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:26

Whaeanui · 01/05/2023 11:14

No-one is 'forced' to belong.

I am, so is my mother and the rest of my whanau, hapu and iwi.

Maori are forced, any vote today would have us outnumbered. We are a minority in our own country due to colonisation, not just the fact that half of our population died due to disease brought on British ships… but actual policy that encouraged assimilation and a ‘breeding out of the native race’ so we would be outnumbered and replaced. Similar thing happened to Hawaiians, our Polynesian motherland, as the indigenous population is a similar percentage there.

I studied civil war with the OU as part of a Masters in Development, and one of the case studies was Northern Ireland. It was fascinating.

But you come to the point where people have lived somewhere for e.g. 300 years and many generations. There comes a point where it becomes their home, the place they have lived for their whole life, and their parents and grandparents and their family history is embedded there.

How long do you need to have family roots before you can 'truly' belong?

What about people whose parents or grandparents have moved to the UK? Do they have fewer rights to vote and be considered UK citizens?

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:28

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:14

Yes, and conflate 'speculation' about Archie's skin tone with security.

She is an expert at insinuation, which allows her to do the 'but I never said XYZ' while having created the suggestion.

I used to work with someone like that - it was a nightmare as she was an expert in making others look bad for innocuous comments by presenting the comment alongside another issue. So the person involved couldn't deny the comment, but trying to explain the context made them look as if they were trying to down play it. It destroyed the team as no-one could trust each other. Eventually the managers got wise to the manipulation, but by then the damage was done, and most people moved on.

Where did Meghan did conflate Archie's skin colour with security.
Meghan did not say the whole of the UK were racist. Dalmation is twisting the words to create a lie.

Whaeanui · 01/05/2023 11:28

Dalmation is twisting the words to create a lie. this happens frequently

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:29

Whaeanui · 01/05/2023 11:23

Well, democracy is majority rule.

Is colonisation democratic? How easy it is of you to just dismiss the fact indigenous people are outnumbered on their own lands by their colonisers. You’ll never understand what that feels like and quite clearly, you don’t care.

What do you suggest going forward? What happened was wrong. How can that be put right? People of indigenous descent have their votes counting double?

What about people whose ancestors were deported from the UK because they stole to support their family? And endured the horrendous conditions of transportation, and have lived for generations as NZ citizens? Do they have any rights?

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:29

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:28

Where did Meghan did conflate Archie's skin colour with security.
Meghan did not say the whole of the UK were racist. Dalmation is twisting the words to create a lie.

In the OW interview

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:30

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:26

I studied civil war with the OU as part of a Masters in Development, and one of the case studies was Northern Ireland. It was fascinating.

But you come to the point where people have lived somewhere for e.g. 300 years and many generations. There comes a point where it becomes their home, the place they have lived for their whole life, and their parents and grandparents and their family history is embedded there.

How long do you need to have family roots before you can 'truly' belong?

What about people whose parents or grandparents have moved to the UK? Do they have fewer rights to vote and be considered UK citizens?

This wasnt a civil war. They were invaded. I dont think you can compare my Turkish neighbours to invaders.

skullbabe · 01/05/2023 11:31

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:20

Yes, racism is a problem in the UK. And in the USA - where they have chosen to live to 'escape' the racism.

No they didn’t go to the US to escape racism.

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:33

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:29

In the OW interview

Ive not seen the interview. What were her exact words?

tatalan · 01/05/2023 11:34

Another day I'm glad that Meghan set herself free from her Father and those half-siblings. She has lost and mourned him, thank God for Doria 😍

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:34

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:30

This wasnt a civil war. They were invaded. I dont think you can compare my Turkish neighbours to invaders.

Well, one of the first things we looked at was the definition of 'war'. And by some definitions the situation on Northern Ireland c. 1970-Good Friday Agreement was a civil war. Also South Africa from the Soweto Uprising to c.1990.

The 'invasion' of Northern Ireland was 300 or so years ago. Yes, a deliberate choice by the English/Scottish governments of the day to settle Ireland with Protestants. But does that mean that it is OK to make their descendants second class citizens?

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:35

skullbabe · 01/05/2023 11:31

No they didn’t go to the US to escape racism.

Yes it was the press.

Whaeanui · 01/05/2023 11:37

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:29

What do you suggest going forward? What happened was wrong. How can that be put right? People of indigenous descent have their votes counting double?

What about people whose ancestors were deported from the UK because they stole to support their family? And endured the horrendous conditions of transportation, and have lived for generations as NZ citizens? Do they have any rights?

You said nobody was forced. I answered you. You are talking about something else to deflect from the simple truth. Colonisation means you forced or invaded us and now we don’t control who is our head of state, despite a treaty agreement that has never been upheld.

What do I suggest going forward? That’s what you have to say? Britain goes to other places and causes decades of trouble and messiness and now I’m to come up with a solution?

let’s see… I’ll start with getting 100% of the value of my grandmothers ( not some relative I didn’t know ) stolen fucking land, seen as we only got 8% of the value so far. How about we start there. Honour the treaty which granted us sovereignty, that’s the first thing actually, and give us the real value of our land. Sadly we can’t do anything to undo the lost genealogy after soldiers mass raped Maori women at Parihaka when they imprisoned the men but let’s start with sovereignty and see how that goes.

I don’t know if I was being asked about Ireland, but fuck knows about that. Britain created a fucking mess there too huh. I’m also Irish.

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:46

Whaeanui · 01/05/2023 11:37

You said nobody was forced. I answered you. You are talking about something else to deflect from the simple truth. Colonisation means you forced or invaded us and now we don’t control who is our head of state, despite a treaty agreement that has never been upheld.

What do I suggest going forward? That’s what you have to say? Britain goes to other places and causes decades of trouble and messiness and now I’m to come up with a solution?

let’s see… I’ll start with getting 100% of the value of my grandmothers ( not some relative I didn’t know ) stolen fucking land, seen as we only got 8% of the value so far. How about we start there. Honour the treaty which granted us sovereignty, that’s the first thing actually, and give us the real value of our land. Sadly we can’t do anything to undo the lost genealogy after soldiers mass raped Maori women at Parihaka when they imprisoned the men but let’s start with sovereignty and see how that goes.

I don’t know if I was being asked about Ireland, but fuck knows about that. Britain created a fucking mess there too huh. I’m also Irish.

Well, I'm all for you getting the 100% value of your grandmothers land. And treaties being adhered to.

But as I am not a citizen of NZ, or an elector, I am not sure what you would like me to do?

Colonisation was wrong.

As a British citizen and voter I can have some (small) influence over the NI situation.

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:48

What could I, personally, do that would remove my historic guilt for what was done? What is in my control that would satisfy you?

Please let me know.

Stemmingthetide · 01/05/2023 11:48

MrsMaxDeWinter · 01/05/2023 11:04

I think this is a confusion between the overseas realms and the Commonwealth.

What Afua Hirsch meant by the Commonwealth being Empire 2.0 is that there is no choice but to have the monarch, who was head of the British Empire, as head of this "voluntary body". It is the only international organisation whose head is not elected by its members, but is chosen based on who sits on the UK throne.

It's silly and anachronistic, but at the end of the day, it is voluntary, so there is no compulsion in the way that there is for the overseas realms.

I suspect there will be changes there too. There were grumbles when Charles took over, and there are moves to see the Commonwealth adopt decision making by voting, which have been resisted by the UK because it would mean the "Western" countries would always be in the minority.

I thought it had all been agreed that after Charles it would be an elected Head.

tatalan · 01/05/2023 11:49

Also Thomas Markle has been 'near death' for damn near five years now, it's getting super 😴

Rockybooboo · 01/05/2023 11:49

mixedrecycling · 01/05/2023 11:42

'There were conversations ...about no security, no title... and how dark his skin might be when he’s born.'

Transcript available here- Meghan Markle Oprah interview: read the full transcript of Duchess and Prince Harry's bombshell confessions | The Sun

Im not reading a whole hpur long interview. What were words that said Archie wasnt given protection because of his skin colour.

You've mentioned it so you must have the exact words.